评估开放式生物质燃烧对英国空气质量的影响

D. Tan, M. Vieno, E. Nemitz, M. Heal, S. Reis
{"title":"评估开放式生物质燃烧对英国空气质量的影响","authors":"D. Tan, M. Vieno, E. Nemitz, M. Heal, S. Reis","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.tan177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Wildfires are a fundamental part of the Earth’s ecosystem. However, climate change and other factors such as population and land-use changes are affecting propensities for fire around the globe, posing an increasing risk to humans and the environment. Some regions may become less vulnerable to wildfires, while others are likely to see an increase in wildfire frequency, magnitude and intensity. The latter includes many European regions, where changes have become apparent over the last decades. The UK, categorised as increasingly vulnerable to wildfire, is also likely to see increases in fire danger and duration (Arnell et al. 2021, Perry et al. 2022). A better understanding of the impact of wildfires, and more generally open biomass burning 1 , is therefore crucial to pre-empting and mitigating the impact of wildfires in different environments. The aim here is to gain an overview of the contribution of open biomass burning to UK air quality. While its absolute contribution is small compared to current conventional anthropogenic emissions, its relative contribution will become more important if increasingly stringent air quality targets are to be met in the future. Fine particulate matter (PM 2 . 5 ) is the pollutant considered here, due to its impact on human health and the ambitious new Air Quality Guideline values recently published by the WHO (2021), which include an annual PM 2 . 5 guideline level of 5 µ g m − 3 . The EMEP4UK chemistry transport model (Vieno et al. 2016) is used, over a European domain and a nested UK domain with 3 km x 3 km horizontal resolution. Emissions from open biomass burning are included using the Fire INventory from National Center for Atmospheric Research (FINN) v1.5. We quantify the magnitude of modelled surface concentrations and identify sources contributing to this, distinguishing between contributions from burning within and outwith the UK, and between primary and secondary PM 2 . 5 . We also aim to distinguish between contributions from wildfires and prescribed burning. UK-wide averages and individual episodic events are considered, with comparison to other emission sources and future air quality targets. Comparison of modelled vs observed concentrations of PM 2 . 5 , including detailed speciated particulate matter data, will be undertaken with data from UK air quality supersites","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of open biomass burning on UK air quality\",\"authors\":\"D. Tan, M. Vieno, E. Nemitz, M. Heal, S. Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.36334/modsim.2023.tan177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Wildfires are a fundamental part of the Earth’s ecosystem. However, climate change and other factors such as population and land-use changes are affecting propensities for fire around the globe, posing an increasing risk to humans and the environment. Some regions may become less vulnerable to wildfires, while others are likely to see an increase in wildfire frequency, magnitude and intensity. The latter includes many European regions, where changes have become apparent over the last decades. The UK, categorised as increasingly vulnerable to wildfire, is also likely to see increases in fire danger and duration (Arnell et al. 2021, Perry et al. 2022). A better understanding of the impact of wildfires, and more generally open biomass burning 1 , is therefore crucial to pre-empting and mitigating the impact of wildfires in different environments. The aim here is to gain an overview of the contribution of open biomass burning to UK air quality. While its absolute contribution is small compared to current conventional anthropogenic emissions, its relative contribution will become more important if increasingly stringent air quality targets are to be met in the future. Fine particulate matter (PM 2 . 5 ) is the pollutant considered here, due to its impact on human health and the ambitious new Air Quality Guideline values recently published by the WHO (2021), which include an annual PM 2 . 5 guideline level of 5 µ g m − 3 . The EMEP4UK chemistry transport model (Vieno et al. 2016) is used, over a European domain and a nested UK domain with 3 km x 3 km horizontal resolution. Emissions from open biomass burning are included using the Fire INventory from National Center for Atmospheric Research (FINN) v1.5. We quantify the magnitude of modelled surface concentrations and identify sources contributing to this, distinguishing between contributions from burning within and outwith the UK, and between primary and secondary PM 2 . 5 . We also aim to distinguish between contributions from wildfires and prescribed burning. UK-wide averages and individual episodic events are considered, with comparison to other emission sources and future air quality targets. Comparison of modelled vs observed concentrations of PM 2 . 5 , including detailed speciated particulate matter data, will be undertaken with data from UK air quality supersites\",\"PeriodicalId\":390064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.tan177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.tan177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野火是地球生态系统的基本组成部分。然而,气候变化以及人口和土地利用变化等其他因素正在影响全球的火灾倾向,对人类和环境构成越来越大的风险。一些地区可能会变得不那么容易受到野火的影响,而另一些地区可能会看到野火的频率、规模和强度增加。后者包括许多欧洲地区,在过去几十年里,这些地区的变化已经变得很明显。被归类为越来越容易受到野火影响的英国,也可能会看到火灾危险和持续时间的增加(Arnell et al. 2021, Perry et al. 2022)。因此,更好地了解野火的影响,以及更普遍的开放式生物质燃烧,对于预防和减轻不同环境下野火的影响至关重要。这里的目的是获得开放生物质燃烧对英国空气质量贡献的概述。虽然与目前传统的人为排放相比,其绝对贡献很小,但如果将来要达到日益严格的空气质量目标,其相对贡献将变得更加重要。细颗粒物(PM 2)。5)是这里考虑的污染物,因为它对人类健康的影响以及世卫组织最近发布的雄心勃勃的新空气质量指南值(2021年),其中包括每年的PM 2。5 .指导水平为5µg m−3。使用EMEP4UK化学输运模型(Vieno et al. 2016),覆盖欧洲区域和嵌套的英国区域,水平分辨率为3公里x 3公里。使用国家大气研究中心(FINN) v1.5版本的火灾清单,包括开放式生物质燃烧产生的排放。我们量化了模拟表面浓度的大小,并确定了造成这种情况的来源,区分了英国内外燃烧的贡献,以及一次和二次PM 2之间的贡献。5 . 我们还旨在区分野火和规定燃烧的贡献。考虑了英国的平均水平和个别偶发事件,并与其他排放源和未来空气质量目标进行了比较。模拟与观测的PM 2浓度的比较。5,包括详细的特定颗粒物数据,将与英国空气质量监测站的数据一起进行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the impact of open biomass burning on UK air quality
: Wildfires are a fundamental part of the Earth’s ecosystem. However, climate change and other factors such as population and land-use changes are affecting propensities for fire around the globe, posing an increasing risk to humans and the environment. Some regions may become less vulnerable to wildfires, while others are likely to see an increase in wildfire frequency, magnitude and intensity. The latter includes many European regions, where changes have become apparent over the last decades. The UK, categorised as increasingly vulnerable to wildfire, is also likely to see increases in fire danger and duration (Arnell et al. 2021, Perry et al. 2022). A better understanding of the impact of wildfires, and more generally open biomass burning 1 , is therefore crucial to pre-empting and mitigating the impact of wildfires in different environments. The aim here is to gain an overview of the contribution of open biomass burning to UK air quality. While its absolute contribution is small compared to current conventional anthropogenic emissions, its relative contribution will become more important if increasingly stringent air quality targets are to be met in the future. Fine particulate matter (PM 2 . 5 ) is the pollutant considered here, due to its impact on human health and the ambitious new Air Quality Guideline values recently published by the WHO (2021), which include an annual PM 2 . 5 guideline level of 5 µ g m − 3 . The EMEP4UK chemistry transport model (Vieno et al. 2016) is used, over a European domain and a nested UK domain with 3 km x 3 km horizontal resolution. Emissions from open biomass burning are included using the Fire INventory from National Center for Atmospheric Research (FINN) v1.5. We quantify the magnitude of modelled surface concentrations and identify sources contributing to this, distinguishing between contributions from burning within and outwith the UK, and between primary and secondary PM 2 . 5 . We also aim to distinguish between contributions from wildfires and prescribed burning. UK-wide averages and individual episodic events are considered, with comparison to other emission sources and future air quality targets. Comparison of modelled vs observed concentrations of PM 2 . 5 , including detailed speciated particulate matter data, will be undertaken with data from UK air quality supersites
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信