Parbeen Bano, Anjum Saiyed, A. Joshi, Gouda Sunil, Nikhilesh Ladha, R. Meena, Arish Husain, M. Hashim
{"title":"双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞对心脏手术患者术中芬太尼需求的影响:一项随机对照介入研究","authors":"Parbeen Bano, Anjum Saiyed, A. Joshi, Gouda Sunil, Nikhilesh Ladha, R. Meena, Arish Husain, M. Hashim","doi":"10.4103/ejca.ejca_4_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newly defined and effective interfacial plane block. Cardiac surgeries are performed mainly via a median sternotomy leads to significant postoperative pain. Multiple studies have confirmed that ESPB is effective in cardiothoracic and abdominal surgeries. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ESPB in two groups (group A and group B) for the intraoperative requirement of fentanyl (entropy index guided), hemodynamic variables, need of first rescue analgesia in the postoperative period, and side effects. Settings and design The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, control, hospital-based interventional study. Patients and methods A total of 60 patients, 18–65 years old of either sex who underwent cardiothoracic surgery by midline sternotomy under general anesthesia, were divided into either group A (n=30), which received ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB by 25 ml 0.5% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg with general anesthesia), or group B (n=30), which received general anesthesia without block. Statistical analysis used To observe the difference in quantitative variables between both groups Student’s t test/analysis of variance test was performed. The Fisher’s exact or χ2 test was used to establish the association between qualitative variables. Results The median requirement of fentanyl (μg/kg/h) in group A and group B was 1.97 (1.43–2.83) and 2.55 (1.55–3.19). This difference was statistically nonsignificant (P=0.348). The mean time of first rescue analgesia in group A and group B was 10.9±8.6 and 7.1±4.4 h, respectively (P<0.05). Demographically both groups were comparable. Conclusions ESPB produced safe and effective analgesia in the postoperative period following cardiac surgery.","PeriodicalId":289218,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block on intraoperative requirement of fentanyl in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled interventional study\",\"authors\":\"Parbeen Bano, Anjum Saiyed, A. Joshi, Gouda Sunil, Nikhilesh Ladha, R. Meena, Arish Husain, M. Hashim\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ejca.ejca_4_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objectives Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newly defined and effective interfacial plane block. Cardiac surgeries are performed mainly via a median sternotomy leads to significant postoperative pain. Multiple studies have confirmed that ESPB is effective in cardiothoracic and abdominal surgeries. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ESPB in two groups (group A and group B) for the intraoperative requirement of fentanyl (entropy index guided), hemodynamic variables, need of first rescue analgesia in the postoperative period, and side effects. Settings and design The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, control, hospital-based interventional study. Patients and methods A total of 60 patients, 18–65 years old of either sex who underwent cardiothoracic surgery by midline sternotomy under general anesthesia, were divided into either group A (n=30), which received ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB by 25 ml 0.5% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg with general anesthesia), or group B (n=30), which received general anesthesia without block. Statistical analysis used To observe the difference in quantitative variables between both groups Student’s t test/analysis of variance test was performed. The Fisher’s exact or χ2 test was used to establish the association between qualitative variables. Results The median requirement of fentanyl (μg/kg/h) in group A and group B was 1.97 (1.43–2.83) and 2.55 (1.55–3.19). This difference was statistically nonsignificant (P=0.348). The mean time of first rescue analgesia in group A and group B was 10.9±8.6 and 7.1±4.4 h, respectively (P<0.05). Demographically both groups were comparable. Conclusions ESPB produced safe and effective analgesia in the postoperative period following cardiac surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejca.ejca_4_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejca.ejca_4_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景与目的竖脊平面块(Erector spinae plane block, ESPB)是一种新定义的有效的界面平面块。心脏手术主要通过胸骨正中切开术进行,导致术后明显疼痛。多项研究证实,ESPB在心胸和腹部手术中是有效的。本研究旨在比较两组(A组和B组)ESPB在术中芬太尼需要量(熵指数引导)、血流动力学指标、术后首次抢救镇痛需求、不良反应等方面的疗效。本研究设计为前瞻性、随机、对照、以医院为基础的干预性研究。患者与方法选择全麻下行胸骨正中线切开心胸外科手术的患者60例,年龄18-65岁,男女均可,分为超声引导双侧ESPB组(n=30)和B组(n=30), A组为25 ml 0.5%罗哌卡因加右美托咪定0.5 μg/kg全麻,B组为无阻滞全麻。采用统计学方法观察两组间数量变量的差异,采用学生t检验/方差分析检验。采用Fisher精确检验或χ2检验来确定定性变量之间的相关性。结果A组和B组芬太尼需要量中位数分别为1.97(1.43 ~ 2.83)和2.55 (1.55 ~ 3.19);差异无统计学意义(P=0.348)。A组、B组患者首次抢救镇痛平均时间分别为10.9±8.6、7.1±4.4 h (P<0.05)。人口统计学上,两组具有可比性。结论ESPB在心脏手术后镇痛安全有效。
Effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block on intraoperative requirement of fentanyl in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled interventional study
Background and objectives Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newly defined and effective interfacial plane block. Cardiac surgeries are performed mainly via a median sternotomy leads to significant postoperative pain. Multiple studies have confirmed that ESPB is effective in cardiothoracic and abdominal surgeries. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ESPB in two groups (group A and group B) for the intraoperative requirement of fentanyl (entropy index guided), hemodynamic variables, need of first rescue analgesia in the postoperative period, and side effects. Settings and design The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, control, hospital-based interventional study. Patients and methods A total of 60 patients, 18–65 years old of either sex who underwent cardiothoracic surgery by midline sternotomy under general anesthesia, were divided into either group A (n=30), which received ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB by 25 ml 0.5% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg with general anesthesia), or group B (n=30), which received general anesthesia without block. Statistical analysis used To observe the difference in quantitative variables between both groups Student’s t test/analysis of variance test was performed. The Fisher’s exact or χ2 test was used to establish the association between qualitative variables. Results The median requirement of fentanyl (μg/kg/h) in group A and group B was 1.97 (1.43–2.83) and 2.55 (1.55–3.19). This difference was statistically nonsignificant (P=0.348). The mean time of first rescue analgesia in group A and group B was 10.9±8.6 and 7.1±4.4 h, respectively (P<0.05). Demographically both groups were comparable. Conclusions ESPB produced safe and effective analgesia in the postoperative period following cardiac surgery.