BGP AS路径环路(BAPL)行为度量研究

Shenglin Zhang, Y. Liu, Dan Pei
{"title":"BGP AS路径环路(BAPL)行为度量研究","authors":"Shenglin Zhang, Y. Liu, Dan Pei","doi":"10.1109/ICCCN.2014.6911734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a path vector protocol, Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) messages contain the entire Autonomous System (AS) path to each destination for breaking arbitrary long AS path loops. However, after observing the global routing data from RouteViews, we find that BGP AS path looping (BAPL) behavior does occur and in fact can lead to multi-AS forwarding loops in both IPv4 and IPv6. The number and ratio of BAPLs in IPv4 and IPv6 for 1456 days on a daily basis are analyzed. Moreover, the distribution of BAPL duration and loop length in IPv4 and IPv6 are also studied. Some possible explanations for BAPLs are discussed in this paper. Private AS number leaking has contributed to 1.76% of BAPLs in IPv4 and 0.00027% in IPv6, and at least 2.85% of BAPLs in IPv4 were attributed to faulty configurations and malicious attacks. Valid explanations, including multinational companies, preventing particular AS from accepting routes, can also lead to BAPLs.","PeriodicalId":404048,"journal":{"name":"2014 23rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A measurement study on BGP AS path looping (BAPL) behavior\",\"authors\":\"Shenglin Zhang, Y. Liu, Dan Pei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCCN.2014.6911734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a path vector protocol, Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) messages contain the entire Autonomous System (AS) path to each destination for breaking arbitrary long AS path loops. However, after observing the global routing data from RouteViews, we find that BGP AS path looping (BAPL) behavior does occur and in fact can lead to multi-AS forwarding loops in both IPv4 and IPv6. The number and ratio of BAPLs in IPv4 and IPv6 for 1456 days on a daily basis are analyzed. Moreover, the distribution of BAPL duration and loop length in IPv4 and IPv6 are also studied. Some possible explanations for BAPLs are discussed in this paper. Private AS number leaking has contributed to 1.76% of BAPLs in IPv4 and 0.00027% in IPv6, and at least 2.85% of BAPLs in IPv4 were attributed to faulty configurations and malicious attacks. Valid explanations, including multinational companies, preventing particular AS from accepting routes, can also lead to BAPLs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 23rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 23rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2014.6911734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 23rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2014.6911734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

BGP (Border Gateway protocol)消息是一种路径矢量协议,它包含到每个目的地的As (Autonomous System)的完整路径,以防止任意长的As路径循环。然而,通过观察RouteViews的全局路由数据,我们发现BGP AS路径环路(BAPL)行为确实存在,并且实际上在IPv4和IPv6中都可能导致多自治系统转发环路。分析了1456天内,IPv4和IPv6的bal数量和比例。此外,还研究了BAPL持续时间和环路长度在IPv4和IPv6中的分布。本文讨论了bal的一些可能的解释。私有AS号泄漏在IPv4中占1.76%,在IPv6中占0.00027%,在IPv4中至少有2.85%的bal是由于配置错误和恶意攻击造成的。有效的解释,包括跨国公司,阻止特定AS接受路由,也可能导致bal。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A measurement study on BGP AS path looping (BAPL) behavior
As a path vector protocol, Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) messages contain the entire Autonomous System (AS) path to each destination for breaking arbitrary long AS path loops. However, after observing the global routing data from RouteViews, we find that BGP AS path looping (BAPL) behavior does occur and in fact can lead to multi-AS forwarding loops in both IPv4 and IPv6. The number and ratio of BAPLs in IPv4 and IPv6 for 1456 days on a daily basis are analyzed. Moreover, the distribution of BAPL duration and loop length in IPv4 and IPv6 are also studied. Some possible explanations for BAPLs are discussed in this paper. Private AS number leaking has contributed to 1.76% of BAPLs in IPv4 and 0.00027% in IPv6, and at least 2.85% of BAPLs in IPv4 were attributed to faulty configurations and malicious attacks. Valid explanations, including multinational companies, preventing particular AS from accepting routes, can also lead to BAPLs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信