{"title":"夹板和近端接触紧密度对种植体修复负荷转移的影响。","authors":"D. Guichet, Diane Yoshinobu, A. Caputo","doi":"10.1067/MPR.2002.124589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\nTo circumvent the difficulty of achieving a passive framework fit, some authors have suggested that multiple adjacent implants be restored individually. This protocol requires that each unit be able to withstand mastication forces. Non-splinted restorations have numerous interproximal contacts that require adjustments prior to placement, with an unknown outcome relative to load transfer.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nThis in vitro simulation study examined the effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on passivity of fit and the load transfer characteristics of implant restorations.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nA photoelastic model of a human partially edentulous left mandible with 3 screw-type implants (3.75 x 10 mm) was fabricated. For non-splinted restorations, individual crowns were fabricated on 3 custom-milled titanium abutments. After the units were cemented, 5 levels of interproximal contact tightness were evaluated: open, ideal (8 microm shim stock drags without tearing), light (ideal +10 microm), medium (ideal + 50 microm), and heavy (ideal + 90 microm). For splinted restorations, five 3-unit fixed partial dentures were fabricated, internally adjusted with silicone disclosing material, and cemented to the model. Changes in stress distribution under simulated non-loaded and loaded conditions (6.8 kg) were analyzed with a polariscope.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn the simulated alveolar structures, non-splinted restorations with heavier interproximal contacts were associated with increased tensile stresses between implants; occlusal loads tended to concentrate around the specific loaded implant. Splinted restorations shared the occlusal loads and distributed the stresses more evenly between the implants when force was applied. The load-sharing effect was most evident on the center implant but also was seen on the terminal abutments of the splinted restorations.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe results of this in vitro study suggest that excessive contact tightness between individual crowns can lead to a non-passive situation. In this experiment, splinted restorations exhibited better load sharing than non-splinted restorations.","PeriodicalId":185384,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"159","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations.\",\"authors\":\"D. Guichet, Diane Yoshinobu, A. Caputo\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/MPR.2002.124589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\\nTo circumvent the difficulty of achieving a passive framework fit, some authors have suggested that multiple adjacent implants be restored individually. This protocol requires that each unit be able to withstand mastication forces. Non-splinted restorations have numerous interproximal contacts that require adjustments prior to placement, with an unknown outcome relative to load transfer.\\n\\n\\nPURPOSE\\nThis in vitro simulation study examined the effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on passivity of fit and the load transfer characteristics of implant restorations.\\n\\n\\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\\nA photoelastic model of a human partially edentulous left mandible with 3 screw-type implants (3.75 x 10 mm) was fabricated. For non-splinted restorations, individual crowns were fabricated on 3 custom-milled titanium abutments. After the units were cemented, 5 levels of interproximal contact tightness were evaluated: open, ideal (8 microm shim stock drags without tearing), light (ideal +10 microm), medium (ideal + 50 microm), and heavy (ideal + 90 microm). For splinted restorations, five 3-unit fixed partial dentures were fabricated, internally adjusted with silicone disclosing material, and cemented to the model. Changes in stress distribution under simulated non-loaded and loaded conditions (6.8 kg) were analyzed with a polariscope.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nIn the simulated alveolar structures, non-splinted restorations with heavier interproximal contacts were associated with increased tensile stresses between implants; occlusal loads tended to concentrate around the specific loaded implant. Splinted restorations shared the occlusal loads and distributed the stresses more evenly between the implants when force was applied. The load-sharing effect was most evident on the center implant but also was seen on the terminal abutments of the splinted restorations.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe results of this in vitro study suggest that excessive contact tightness between individual crowns can lead to a non-passive situation. In this experiment, splinted restorations exhibited better load sharing than non-splinted restorations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"159\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1067/MPR.2002.124589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/MPR.2002.124589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 159
摘要
为了避免实现被动框架配合的困难,一些作者建议多个相邻种植体单独修复。该协议要求每个单元都能承受咀嚼力。非夹板修复体有许多近端接触,在放置前需要调整,相对于负荷转移的结果未知。目的:研究夹板和近端接触紧密度对种植体修复体配合被动性和负荷转移特性的影响。材料与方法制备3颗螺钉型种植体(3.75 x 10 mm)的人左下颌骨部分无牙光弹模型。对于非夹板修复体,在3个定制磨钛基台上制作单个冠。单元粘合后,评估5个级别的近端接触紧密度:开放,理想(8微米垫片未撕裂),轻(理想+10微米),中(理想+ 50微米)和重(理想+ 90微米)。对于夹板修复,制作5个3单元固定局部义齿,用硅酮揭露材料内部调整,并粘合到模型上。用偏光镜分析了模拟无载荷和加载(6.8 kg)条件下应力分布的变化。结果在模拟牙槽结构中,近端接触较重的非夹板修复体与种植体之间的拉伸应力增加有关;咬合负荷倾向于集中在特定负载种植体周围。当施加力时,夹板修复体分担了咬合负荷,并且在种植体之间更均匀地分布应力。负荷分担效应在中心种植体上最为明显,但在夹板修复体的末端基台上也可以看到。结论牙冠间接触过紧可导致非被动情况。在本实验中,固定修复体比非固定修复体表现出更好的负荷分担。
Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
To circumvent the difficulty of achieving a passive framework fit, some authors have suggested that multiple adjacent implants be restored individually. This protocol requires that each unit be able to withstand mastication forces. Non-splinted restorations have numerous interproximal contacts that require adjustments prior to placement, with an unknown outcome relative to load transfer.
PURPOSE
This in vitro simulation study examined the effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on passivity of fit and the load transfer characteristics of implant restorations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A photoelastic model of a human partially edentulous left mandible with 3 screw-type implants (3.75 x 10 mm) was fabricated. For non-splinted restorations, individual crowns were fabricated on 3 custom-milled titanium abutments. After the units were cemented, 5 levels of interproximal contact tightness were evaluated: open, ideal (8 microm shim stock drags without tearing), light (ideal +10 microm), medium (ideal + 50 microm), and heavy (ideal + 90 microm). For splinted restorations, five 3-unit fixed partial dentures were fabricated, internally adjusted with silicone disclosing material, and cemented to the model. Changes in stress distribution under simulated non-loaded and loaded conditions (6.8 kg) were analyzed with a polariscope.
RESULTS
In the simulated alveolar structures, non-splinted restorations with heavier interproximal contacts were associated with increased tensile stresses between implants; occlusal loads tended to concentrate around the specific loaded implant. Splinted restorations shared the occlusal loads and distributed the stresses more evenly between the implants when force was applied. The load-sharing effect was most evident on the center implant but also was seen on the terminal abutments of the splinted restorations.
CONCLUSION
The results of this in vitro study suggest that excessive contact tightness between individual crowns can lead to a non-passive situation. In this experiment, splinted restorations exhibited better load sharing than non-splinted restorations.