固态照明测量保证程序总结与元数据分析

C. C. Miller, M. Nadal, B. Tsai
{"title":"固态照明测量保证程序总结与元数据分析","authors":"C. C. Miller, M. Nadal, B. Tsai","doi":"10.25039/X46.2019.OP29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began to offer proficiency testing for Solid-State Lighting (SSL) products through a Measurement Assurance Program (MAP) in 2010. This article communicates the results of the first version of the MAP in which 118 worldwide laboratories participated. Statistical analysis of how the laboratories’ measurements compared to NIST’s measurements are presented. In general, all the laboratory results are within +/- 4 % for total luminous flux and luminous efficacy measurements. The discussion provides reasons for any discrepancies or large uncertainty intervals found in the data. A major finding was that measurement differences of RMS current had a larger standard deviation and number of outliers than expected. Two possible explanations are (1) the discrepancies are due to issues with using 4-pole sockets, and (2) the large deviation is caused by some solid state lamps being sensitive to impedance and slew rate of AC power supplies.","PeriodicalId":121032,"journal":{"name":"PROCEEDINGS OF the 29th Quadrennial Session of the CIE","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SOLID-STATE LIGHTING MEASUREMENT ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY WITH ANALYSIS OF METADATA\",\"authors\":\"C. C. Miller, M. Nadal, B. Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.25039/X46.2019.OP29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began to offer proficiency testing for Solid-State Lighting (SSL) products through a Measurement Assurance Program (MAP) in 2010. This article communicates the results of the first version of the MAP in which 118 worldwide laboratories participated. Statistical analysis of how the laboratories’ measurements compared to NIST’s measurements are presented. In general, all the laboratory results are within +/- 4 % for total luminous flux and luminous efficacy measurements. The discussion provides reasons for any discrepancies or large uncertainty intervals found in the data. A major finding was that measurement differences of RMS current had a larger standard deviation and number of outliers than expected. Two possible explanations are (1) the discrepancies are due to issues with using 4-pole sockets, and (2) the large deviation is caused by some solid state lamps being sensitive to impedance and slew rate of AC power supplies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PROCEEDINGS OF the 29th Quadrennial Session of the CIE\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PROCEEDINGS OF the 29th Quadrennial Session of the CIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25039/X46.2019.OP29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROCEEDINGS OF the 29th Quadrennial Session of the CIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25039/X46.2019.OP29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2010年,美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)开始通过测量保证计划(MAP)为固态照明(SSL)产品提供能力测试。本文介绍了全球118个实验室参与的第一版MAP的结果。将实验室的测量结果与NIST的测量结果进行了统计分析。总的来说,总光通量和光效测量的所有实验室结果都在+/- 4%以内。讨论提供了在数据中发现的任何差异或大不确定区间的原因。一个重要的发现是均方根电流的测量差异具有比预期更大的标准偏差和异常值数量。两种可能的解释是(1)差异是由于使用4极插座的问题,(2)大偏差是由一些固态灯对交流电源的阻抗和转换率敏感引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SOLID-STATE LIGHTING MEASUREMENT ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY WITH ANALYSIS OF METADATA
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began to offer proficiency testing for Solid-State Lighting (SSL) products through a Measurement Assurance Program (MAP) in 2010. This article communicates the results of the first version of the MAP in which 118 worldwide laboratories participated. Statistical analysis of how the laboratories’ measurements compared to NIST’s measurements are presented. In general, all the laboratory results are within +/- 4 % for total luminous flux and luminous efficacy measurements. The discussion provides reasons for any discrepancies or large uncertainty intervals found in the data. A major finding was that measurement differences of RMS current had a larger standard deviation and number of outliers than expected. Two possible explanations are (1) the discrepancies are due to issues with using 4-pole sockets, and (2) the large deviation is caused by some solid state lamps being sensitive to impedance and slew rate of AC power supplies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信