用等效对角支撑模型分析约束砌体墙的推覆

Nemanja Krtinić, M. Gams, M. Marinković
{"title":"用等效对角支撑模型分析约束砌体墙的推覆","authors":"Nemanja Krtinić, M. Gams, M. Marinković","doi":"10.5592/co/2crocee.2023.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Masonry structures are commonly used for building residential buildings throughout the Balkans and worldwide, in urban and rural areas and areas with seismic risk. For masonry construction in regions with seismic risk, confined masonry (CM) construction offers an appealing alternative to unreinforced masonry (URM) due to its better seismic performance. The numerical simulation of CM is often based on the Equivalent Strut Model (ESM). Such a model provides a very reasonable compromise between accuracy and efficiency and is simple enough for use in design. The purpose of this paper is to compare the results of an experimental shear compression test on a modern CM wall with different ESM models. Five ESM models proposed by various authors are compared. The numerical pushover analyses were performed in the SAP2000 software, and the reference points of the model that gave the best alignment with experimental results were estimated using regression analyses. The results show that the simple modelling of CM walls with an equivalent diagonal strut, which carries load only in compression, can accurately simulate the global seismic response and is suitable for practical applications.","PeriodicalId":427395,"journal":{"name":"2nd Croatian Conference on Earthquake Engineering ‒ 2CroCEE","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF CONFINED MASONRY WALLS USING EQUIVALENT DIAGONAL STRUT MODELS\",\"authors\":\"Nemanja Krtinić, M. Gams, M. Marinković\",\"doi\":\"10.5592/co/2crocee.2023.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Masonry structures are commonly used for building residential buildings throughout the Balkans and worldwide, in urban and rural areas and areas with seismic risk. For masonry construction in regions with seismic risk, confined masonry (CM) construction offers an appealing alternative to unreinforced masonry (URM) due to its better seismic performance. The numerical simulation of CM is often based on the Equivalent Strut Model (ESM). Such a model provides a very reasonable compromise between accuracy and efficiency and is simple enough for use in design. The purpose of this paper is to compare the results of an experimental shear compression test on a modern CM wall with different ESM models. Five ESM models proposed by various authors are compared. The numerical pushover analyses were performed in the SAP2000 software, and the reference points of the model that gave the best alignment with experimental results were estimated using regression analyses. The results show that the simple modelling of CM walls with an equivalent diagonal strut, which carries load only in compression, can accurately simulate the global seismic response and is suitable for practical applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":427395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2nd Croatian Conference on Earthquake Engineering ‒ 2CroCEE\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2nd Croatian Conference on Earthquake Engineering ‒ 2CroCEE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5592/co/2crocee.2023.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2nd Croatian Conference on Earthquake Engineering ‒ 2CroCEE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5592/co/2crocee.2023.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在整个巴尔干半岛和世界范围内,无论是在城市还是农村地区,以及有地震风险的地区,砖石结构通常用于建造住宅建筑。对于地震危险地区的砌体建筑,约束砌体(CM)结构由于其更好的抗震性能而成为非增强砌体(URM)的一种有吸引力的替代方案。CM的数值模拟通常基于等效支撑模型(ESM)。这样的模型在精度和效率之间提供了一个非常合理的折衷,并且在设计中使用足够简单。本文的目的是比较不同ESM模型在现代CM壁上的实验剪切压缩试验结果。比较了不同作者提出的五种ESM模型。在SAP2000软件中进行了数值推覆分析,并使用回归分析估计了与实验结果最一致的模型参考点。结果表明,采用等效对角杆结构的CM墙的简单建模方法能够准确地模拟整体地震反应,具有较好的实际应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF CONFINED MASONRY WALLS USING EQUIVALENT DIAGONAL STRUT MODELS
Masonry structures are commonly used for building residential buildings throughout the Balkans and worldwide, in urban and rural areas and areas with seismic risk. For masonry construction in regions with seismic risk, confined masonry (CM) construction offers an appealing alternative to unreinforced masonry (URM) due to its better seismic performance. The numerical simulation of CM is often based on the Equivalent Strut Model (ESM). Such a model provides a very reasonable compromise between accuracy and efficiency and is simple enough for use in design. The purpose of this paper is to compare the results of an experimental shear compression test on a modern CM wall with different ESM models. Five ESM models proposed by various authors are compared. The numerical pushover analyses were performed in the SAP2000 software, and the reference points of the model that gave the best alignment with experimental results were estimated using regression analyses. The results show that the simple modelling of CM walls with an equivalent diagonal strut, which carries load only in compression, can accurately simulate the global seismic response and is suitable for practical applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信