{"title":"光学表面测量中的非线性效应","authors":"E. Church, S. Feng, P. Takacs","doi":"10.1364/oft.1988.tha7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines non-linear effects which appear in the measurement of surface topography by phase-shifting interference microscopy due to the non-linear relationship between the measured profile, Zm(x), and the true profile, Zt(x). To lowest order this is where P(x) is the point-spread function of the measurement. In an ideal system P(x) = δ(x), the non-linear functions Arg and Exp cancel, and Zm(x) = Zt(x). In real systems, however, P(x) has a finite width which upsets this proportionality. In earlier studies we developed comprehensive models for P(x) by comparing optical and mechanical measurements of smooth surfaces [1,2]. Here we use these models to explore the nature and magnitudes of the non-linear effects which arise in the measurement of rough deterministic and random surfaces for which the linearization of Eq. 1 is not possible. This is done both analytically and via Monte-Carlo simulations.","PeriodicalId":354934,"journal":{"name":"Optical Fabrication and Testing","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Linear Effects in Optical Surface Metrology\",\"authors\":\"E. Church, S. Feng, P. Takacs\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/oft.1988.tha7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines non-linear effects which appear in the measurement of surface topography by phase-shifting interference microscopy due to the non-linear relationship between the measured profile, Zm(x), and the true profile, Zt(x). To lowest order this is where P(x) is the point-spread function of the measurement. In an ideal system P(x) = δ(x), the non-linear functions Arg and Exp cancel, and Zm(x) = Zt(x). In real systems, however, P(x) has a finite width which upsets this proportionality. In earlier studies we developed comprehensive models for P(x) by comparing optical and mechanical measurements of smooth surfaces [1,2]. Here we use these models to explore the nature and magnitudes of the non-linear effects which arise in the measurement of rough deterministic and random surfaces for which the linearization of Eq. 1 is not possible. This is done both analytically and via Monte-Carlo simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optical Fabrication and Testing\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optical Fabrication and Testing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1364/oft.1988.tha7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optical Fabrication and Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/oft.1988.tha7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper examines non-linear effects which appear in the measurement of surface topography by phase-shifting interference microscopy due to the non-linear relationship between the measured profile, Zm(x), and the true profile, Zt(x). To lowest order this is where P(x) is the point-spread function of the measurement. In an ideal system P(x) = δ(x), the non-linear functions Arg and Exp cancel, and Zm(x) = Zt(x). In real systems, however, P(x) has a finite width which upsets this proportionality. In earlier studies we developed comprehensive models for P(x) by comparing optical and mechanical measurements of smooth surfaces [1,2]. Here we use these models to explore the nature and magnitudes of the non-linear effects which arise in the measurement of rough deterministic and random surfaces for which the linearization of Eq. 1 is not possible. This is done both analytically and via Monte-Carlo simulations.