Rachel A. Ranson, T. Peabody, Christopher Saker, A. Lucido, Jiateng Lin, Arianna L. Gianakos, M. Stamm, M. Mulcahey
{"title":"在美国,大多数骨科住院医师都是对抗疗法男性","authors":"Rachel A. Ranson, T. Peabody, Christopher Saker, A. Lucido, Jiateng Lin, Arianna L. Gianakos, M. Stamm, M. Mulcahey","doi":"10.60118/001c.57673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a paucity of information regarding the demographic characteristics of faculty at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) orthopaedic surgery residency programs. The purpose of this study was to determine the demographics and education training of all current orthopaedic surgery residency program faculty members. We hypothesized that there would be a sex discrepancy among orthopaedic surgery faculty, and that there would be fewer DO (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine) than MD (Medical Doctor) orthopaedic surgeons in academic medicine. The Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used to identify all orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States. The following information was collected from each program website: faculty sex, degree, academic role, administrative title, and subspecialty. Faculty roles, titles, and subspecialties were compared across type of institution, degree earned, and sex using Chi squared and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Of the 4,325 faculty members identified, 3,893 were male (90%) and 4,033 were MDs (93%). The most common subspecialty was sports medicine (789, 18%). While traditional ACGME programs still had more MD faculty (3,728, 97.5%) (p<0.001), the majority of faculty at traditional American Osteopathic Association (AOA) programs were also MDs (305, 61%). There were more male DOs than male MDs (95.6% vs. 89.3%, p<0.001). More DOs practiced general orthopaedics (14.8% vs. 4.1%), whereas more MDs practiced upper extremity and orthopaedic oncology (p<0.001). More male faculty practiced adult reconstruction (616, 15.8%), trauma (489, 12.6%), spine (471, 12.1%), and sports medicine (719, 18.5%), whereas more female faculty practiced pediatrics (135, 31.3%), upper extremity (100, 23.1%), and oncology (33, 7.6%). More male faculty held titles as chair of orthopaedic surgery (145, 3.7%) and fellowship director (111, 2.9%) than females (5, 1.2% and 5, 1.2%). Males were also listed as assistant professor (1057, 27.2% vs 188, 43.5%), associate professor (636, 16.3% vs 86, 19.9%), and professor (618, 15.9% vs 41, 9.5%) more commonly than females. The current faculty of orthopaedic surgery residency programs is heavily male dominated, holding higher academic roles and administrative titles than women. There is also a high prevalence of MDs with higher academic roles and administrative titles than DOs.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Majority of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Faculty in the United States are Allopathic Males\",\"authors\":\"Rachel A. Ranson, T. Peabody, Christopher Saker, A. Lucido, Jiateng Lin, Arianna L. Gianakos, M. Stamm, M. Mulcahey\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.57673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a paucity of information regarding the demographic characteristics of faculty at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) orthopaedic surgery residency programs. The purpose of this study was to determine the demographics and education training of all current orthopaedic surgery residency program faculty members. We hypothesized that there would be a sex discrepancy among orthopaedic surgery faculty, and that there would be fewer DO (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine) than MD (Medical Doctor) orthopaedic surgeons in academic medicine. The Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used to identify all orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States. The following information was collected from each program website: faculty sex, degree, academic role, administrative title, and subspecialty. Faculty roles, titles, and subspecialties were compared across type of institution, degree earned, and sex using Chi squared and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Of the 4,325 faculty members identified, 3,893 were male (90%) and 4,033 were MDs (93%). The most common subspecialty was sports medicine (789, 18%). While traditional ACGME programs still had more MD faculty (3,728, 97.5%) (p<0.001), the majority of faculty at traditional American Osteopathic Association (AOA) programs were also MDs (305, 61%). There were more male DOs than male MDs (95.6% vs. 89.3%, p<0.001). More DOs practiced general orthopaedics (14.8% vs. 4.1%), whereas more MDs practiced upper extremity and orthopaedic oncology (p<0.001). More male faculty practiced adult reconstruction (616, 15.8%), trauma (489, 12.6%), spine (471, 12.1%), and sports medicine (719, 18.5%), whereas more female faculty practiced pediatrics (135, 31.3%), upper extremity (100, 23.1%), and oncology (33, 7.6%). More male faculty held titles as chair of orthopaedic surgery (145, 3.7%) and fellowship director (111, 2.9%) than females (5, 1.2% and 5, 1.2%). Males were also listed as assistant professor (1057, 27.2% vs 188, 43.5%), associate professor (636, 16.3% vs 86, 19.9%), and professor (618, 15.9% vs 41, 9.5%) more commonly than females. The current faculty of orthopaedic surgery residency programs is heavily male dominated, holding higher academic roles and administrative titles than women. There is also a high prevalence of MDs with higher academic roles and administrative titles than DOs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.57673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.57673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
关于研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)骨科住院医师项目教师的人口统计学特征的信息缺乏。本研究的目的是确定目前所有骨科住院医师计划教员的人口统计学和教育培训情况。我们假设在骨科教员中存在性别差异,并且在学术医学中骨科医生DO (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine)少于MD (Medical Doctor)。奖学金和住院医师电子互动数据库被用来识别美国所有的骨科外科住院医师项目。以下信息从每个项目网站收集:教师性别,学位,学术角色,行政职称和亚专业。使用卡方和方差分析(ANOVA)对不同类型的机构、获得的学位和性别的教师角色、职称和亚专业进行比较。在确定的4325名教员中,3893名是男性(90%),4033名是医学博士(93%)。最常见的亚专科是运动医学(789,18%)。虽然传统的ACGME项目仍然有更多的医学博士教师(3728,97.5%)(p<0.001),但传统的美国骨科协会(AOA)项目的大多数教师也是医学博士(305,61%)。男性DOs多于男性MDs(95.6%比89.3%,p<0.001)。更多的DOs从事普通骨科(14.8%比4.1%),而更多的md从事上肢和骨科肿瘤学(p<0.001)。男性教师从事成人重建(616人,15.8%)、创伤(489人,12.6%)、脊柱(471人,12.1%)和运动医学(719人,18.5%),而女性教师从事儿科(135人,31.3%)、上肢(100人,23.1%)和肿瘤学(33人,7.6%)。担任骨科主席(145人,3.7%)和研究员主任(111人,2.9%)的男性教师多于女性(5人,1.2%和5人,1.2%)。男性被列为助理教授(1057人,27.2%比188人,43.5%)、副教授(636人,16.3%比86人,19.9%)、教授(618人,15.9%比41人,9.5%)的比例也高于女性。目前骨科住院医师项目的教师主要由男性主导,他们比女性拥有更高的学术角色和行政头衔。拥有更高学术角色和行政头衔的医学博士也比医学博士多。
The Majority of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Faculty in the United States are Allopathic Males
There is a paucity of information regarding the demographic characteristics of faculty at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) orthopaedic surgery residency programs. The purpose of this study was to determine the demographics and education training of all current orthopaedic surgery residency program faculty members. We hypothesized that there would be a sex discrepancy among orthopaedic surgery faculty, and that there would be fewer DO (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine) than MD (Medical Doctor) orthopaedic surgeons in academic medicine. The Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database was used to identify all orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the United States. The following information was collected from each program website: faculty sex, degree, academic role, administrative title, and subspecialty. Faculty roles, titles, and subspecialties were compared across type of institution, degree earned, and sex using Chi squared and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Of the 4,325 faculty members identified, 3,893 were male (90%) and 4,033 were MDs (93%). The most common subspecialty was sports medicine (789, 18%). While traditional ACGME programs still had more MD faculty (3,728, 97.5%) (p<0.001), the majority of faculty at traditional American Osteopathic Association (AOA) programs were also MDs (305, 61%). There were more male DOs than male MDs (95.6% vs. 89.3%, p<0.001). More DOs practiced general orthopaedics (14.8% vs. 4.1%), whereas more MDs practiced upper extremity and orthopaedic oncology (p<0.001). More male faculty practiced adult reconstruction (616, 15.8%), trauma (489, 12.6%), spine (471, 12.1%), and sports medicine (719, 18.5%), whereas more female faculty practiced pediatrics (135, 31.3%), upper extremity (100, 23.1%), and oncology (33, 7.6%). More male faculty held titles as chair of orthopaedic surgery (145, 3.7%) and fellowship director (111, 2.9%) than females (5, 1.2% and 5, 1.2%). Males were also listed as assistant professor (1057, 27.2% vs 188, 43.5%), associate professor (636, 16.3% vs 86, 19.9%), and professor (618, 15.9% vs 41, 9.5%) more commonly than females. The current faculty of orthopaedic surgery residency programs is heavily male dominated, holding higher academic roles and administrative titles than women. There is also a high prevalence of MDs with higher academic roles and administrative titles than DOs.