{"title":"我们都很伤心:收养，堕胎，和多布斯的冷漠","authors":"Susan Bordo","doi":"10.1353/ado.0.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My experience as an adoptive mother who got to know my daughter’s birthmother during her pregnancy demonstrates the inhumanity of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which turns pregnancy into a fetal delivery system rather than a profoundly transformative experience. This de-humanization undergirds both the Alito/Barrett attitude toward abortion and adoption and the babies who are imagined as refilling diminished stock for the market in babies.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"We Both Grieved: Adoption, Abortion, and the Callous Indifference of Dobbs\",\"authors\":\"Susan Bordo\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ado.0.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"My experience as an adoptive mother who got to know my daughter’s birthmother during her pregnancy demonstrates the inhumanity of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which turns pregnancy into a fetal delivery system rather than a profoundly transformative experience. This de-humanization undergirds both the Alito/Barrett attitude toward abortion and adoption and the babies who are imagined as refilling diminished stock for the market in babies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adoption & Culture\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adoption & Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.0.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作为一名养母，我在女儿怀孕期间认识了她的生母，我的经历证明了多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织(Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization)一案的裁决是不人道的，它把怀孕变成了一种胎儿分娩系统，而不是一种深刻的变革经历。这种非人性化强化了阿利托/巴雷特对堕胎和收养的态度，也强化了婴儿被想象为填补婴儿市场上减少的库存。
We Both Grieved: Adoption, Abortion, and the Callous Indifference of Dobbs
My experience as an adoptive mother who got to know my daughter’s birthmother during her pregnancy demonstrates the inhumanity of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which turns pregnancy into a fetal delivery system rather than a profoundly transformative experience. This de-humanization undergirds both the Alito/Barrett attitude toward abortion and adoption and the babies who are imagined as refilling diminished stock for the market in babies.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
