中央结算所的短名单

N. Arnosti
{"title":"中央结算所的短名单","authors":"N. Arnosti","doi":"10.1145/2764468.2764533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stable matching mechanisms are used to clear many two-sided markets. In most settings, frictions cause participants to submit short preference lists (even if there are many potentially acceptable matches). This paper studies the consequences of this fact, and focuses on two broad questions. First, when lists are short, what is the quantity and quality of matches formed through the clearinghouse? Second, what are the effects of introducing an aftermarket which allows agents left unmatched by the clearinghouse to find one another? The answers to these questions depend crucially on the extent and form of correlations in agent preferences. I consider three canonical preference structures: fully independent (or idiosyncratic) preferences, vertical preferences (agents agree on the attractiveness of those on the opposite side), and aligned preferences (potential partners agree on the attractiveness of their match). I find that when agent preferences are idiosyncratic, more matches form than when agents are vertically differentiated. Perhaps more surprisingly, I show that the case of aligned preferences causes the fewest matches to form. When considering quality of matches, the story reverses itself: aligned preferences produce the most high quality matches, followed by correlated preferences, with independent preferences producing the fewest. These facts have implications for the design of priority structures and tie-breaking procedures in school choice settings, as they point to a fundamental tradeoff between matching many students, and maximizing the number of students who get one of their top choices. Regarding the role of the aftermarket, I find that when preferences are aligned, the aftermarket unambiguously improves the welfare of both sides. In other cases, however, the introduction of an aftermarket has multiple competing effects, and may either raise or lower aggregate welfare. This suggests that when designing an aftermarket, the extent and form of correlations in agent preferences are an important factor to consider.","PeriodicalId":376992,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short Lists in Centralized Clearinghouses\",\"authors\":\"N. Arnosti\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2764468.2764533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stable matching mechanisms are used to clear many two-sided markets. In most settings, frictions cause participants to submit short preference lists (even if there are many potentially acceptable matches). This paper studies the consequences of this fact, and focuses on two broad questions. First, when lists are short, what is the quantity and quality of matches formed through the clearinghouse? Second, what are the effects of introducing an aftermarket which allows agents left unmatched by the clearinghouse to find one another? The answers to these questions depend crucially on the extent and form of correlations in agent preferences. I consider three canonical preference structures: fully independent (or idiosyncratic) preferences, vertical preferences (agents agree on the attractiveness of those on the opposite side), and aligned preferences (potential partners agree on the attractiveness of their match). I find that when agent preferences are idiosyncratic, more matches form than when agents are vertically differentiated. Perhaps more surprisingly, I show that the case of aligned preferences causes the fewest matches to form. When considering quality of matches, the story reverses itself: aligned preferences produce the most high quality matches, followed by correlated preferences, with independent preferences producing the fewest. These facts have implications for the design of priority structures and tie-breaking procedures in school choice settings, as they point to a fundamental tradeoff between matching many students, and maximizing the number of students who get one of their top choices. Regarding the role of the aftermarket, I find that when preferences are aligned, the aftermarket unambiguously improves the welfare of both sides. In other cases, however, the introduction of an aftermarket has multiple competing effects, and may either raise or lower aggregate welfare. This suggests that when designing an aftermarket, the extent and form of correlations in agent preferences are an important factor to consider.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2764468.2764533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2764468.2764533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

稳定的匹配机制用于清算许多双边市场。在大多数情况下,摩擦会导致参与者提交简短的偏好列表(即使有许多潜在的可接受匹配)。本文研究了这一事实的后果,并着重于两个广泛的问题。首先,当名单很短时,通过信息交换中心形成的匹配数量和质量如何?第二,引入一个售后市场,使票据交换所无法匹配的代理人找到彼此,会产生什么影响?这些问题的答案在很大程度上取决于主体偏好相关性的程度和形式。我考虑了三种典型的偏好结构:完全独立的(或特殊的)偏好,垂直偏好(代理人同意对面人的吸引力)和对齐偏好(潜在伴侣同意他们匹配的吸引力)。我发现,当代理人的偏好是特殊的,比当代理人垂直分化时,形成更多的匹配。也许更令人惊讶的是,我展示了一致偏好的情况下,形成的匹配最少。当考虑到匹配的质量时,情况正好相反:一致的偏好产生最高质量的匹配,其次是相关的偏好,独立的偏好产生最少的匹配。这些事实对择校设置中的优先级结构设计和打破僵局程序具有启示意义,因为它们指出了匹配许多学生和最大化获得首选之一的学生人数之间的基本权衡。关于售后市场的作用,我发现当偏好一致时,售后市场无疑提高了双方的福利。然而,在其他情况下,后市场的引入具有多重竞争效应,可能提高或降低总福利。这表明,在设计售后市场时,代理商偏好相关性的程度和形式是需要考虑的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short Lists in Centralized Clearinghouses
Stable matching mechanisms are used to clear many two-sided markets. In most settings, frictions cause participants to submit short preference lists (even if there are many potentially acceptable matches). This paper studies the consequences of this fact, and focuses on two broad questions. First, when lists are short, what is the quantity and quality of matches formed through the clearinghouse? Second, what are the effects of introducing an aftermarket which allows agents left unmatched by the clearinghouse to find one another? The answers to these questions depend crucially on the extent and form of correlations in agent preferences. I consider three canonical preference structures: fully independent (or idiosyncratic) preferences, vertical preferences (agents agree on the attractiveness of those on the opposite side), and aligned preferences (potential partners agree on the attractiveness of their match). I find that when agent preferences are idiosyncratic, more matches form than when agents are vertically differentiated. Perhaps more surprisingly, I show that the case of aligned preferences causes the fewest matches to form. When considering quality of matches, the story reverses itself: aligned preferences produce the most high quality matches, followed by correlated preferences, with independent preferences producing the fewest. These facts have implications for the design of priority structures and tie-breaking procedures in school choice settings, as they point to a fundamental tradeoff between matching many students, and maximizing the number of students who get one of their top choices. Regarding the role of the aftermarket, I find that when preferences are aligned, the aftermarket unambiguously improves the welfare of both sides. In other cases, however, the introduction of an aftermarket has multiple competing effects, and may either raise or lower aggregate welfare. This suggests that when designing an aftermarket, the extent and form of correlations in agent preferences are an important factor to consider.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信