将软件过程评估的经验教训应用于ABET认证

J. Collofello
{"title":"将软件过程评估的经验教训应用于ABET认证","authors":"J. Collofello","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2004.1408548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Software Engineering Institute capability maturity model (CMM) has been widely utilized in the software development community as a means of assessing the maturity of a software development organization and providing a framework for improvement ABET 2000 is also now being utilizing as a means for assessing engineering education programs and providing a framework for improvement. In addition to sharing the same general objectives of assessment and process improvement there are other similarities in both approaches and their application within organizations and universities respectively. Due to these similarities academic organizations embarking on ABET accreditation activities can learn from the numerous lessons from organizations which have undergone CMM activities. This approach was followed at Arizona State University. Since several ASU faculty have been heavily involved in CMM activities over the last decade, it was easy for them to recognize the similarities between accreditation and CMM assessment They utilized their knowledge of lessons learned from CMM assessments and integrated them into the ASU accreditation effort. The results of this activity are described in this paper. The paper begins with a discussion of the similarities of CMM and ABET. Both technical and nontechnical similarities such as the impact of employee / faculty buy-in and management / administrative support was addressed. A review of lessons learned from organizations engaging in CMM activities was presented in the context of how they might help academic organizations in their ABET activities and how ASU applied each lesson.","PeriodicalId":339926,"journal":{"name":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying lessons learned from software process assessments to ABET accreditation\",\"authors\":\"J. Collofello\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2004.1408548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Software Engineering Institute capability maturity model (CMM) has been widely utilized in the software development community as a means of assessing the maturity of a software development organization and providing a framework for improvement ABET 2000 is also now being utilizing as a means for assessing engineering education programs and providing a framework for improvement. In addition to sharing the same general objectives of assessment and process improvement there are other similarities in both approaches and their application within organizations and universities respectively. Due to these similarities academic organizations embarking on ABET accreditation activities can learn from the numerous lessons from organizations which have undergone CMM activities. This approach was followed at Arizona State University. Since several ASU faculty have been heavily involved in CMM activities over the last decade, it was easy for them to recognize the similarities between accreditation and CMM assessment They utilized their knowledge of lessons learned from CMM assessments and integrated them into the ASU accreditation effort. The results of this activity are described in this paper. The paper begins with a discussion of the similarities of CMM and ABET. Both technical and nontechnical similarities such as the impact of employee / faculty buy-in and management / administrative support was addressed. A review of lessons learned from organizations engaging in CMM activities was presented in the context of how they might help academic organizations in their ABET activities and how ASU applied each lesson.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

软件工程协会的能力成熟度模型(CMM)已经在软件开发社区中被广泛使用,作为评估软件开发组织成熟度的一种手段,并为改进提供框架。ABET 2000现在也被用作评估工程教育计划的一种手段,并为改进提供框架。除了共享相同的评估和过程改进的一般目标之外,这两种方法及其在组织和大学中的应用也有其他相似之处。由于这些相似之处,从事ABET认证活动的学术组织可以从经历过CMM活动的组织那里吸取许多经验教训。亚利桑那州立大学采用了这种方法。由于几位亚利桑那州立大学的教师在过去的十年中一直积极参与CMM活动,他们很容易认识到认证和CMM评估之间的相似之处。他们利用从CMM评估中吸取的经验教训,并将其整合到亚利桑那州立大学的认证工作中。本文描述了这一活动的结果。本文首先讨论了CMM和ABET的相似之处。讨论了技术和非技术方面的相似之处,例如员工/教师的支持和管理/行政支持的影响。从参与CMM活动的组织中吸取的经验教训在如何帮助学术组织进行ABET活动以及亚利桑那州立大学如何应用这些经验教训的背景下进行了回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying lessons learned from software process assessments to ABET accreditation
The Software Engineering Institute capability maturity model (CMM) has been widely utilized in the software development community as a means of assessing the maturity of a software development organization and providing a framework for improvement ABET 2000 is also now being utilizing as a means for assessing engineering education programs and providing a framework for improvement. In addition to sharing the same general objectives of assessment and process improvement there are other similarities in both approaches and their application within organizations and universities respectively. Due to these similarities academic organizations embarking on ABET accreditation activities can learn from the numerous lessons from organizations which have undergone CMM activities. This approach was followed at Arizona State University. Since several ASU faculty have been heavily involved in CMM activities over the last decade, it was easy for them to recognize the similarities between accreditation and CMM assessment They utilized their knowledge of lessons learned from CMM assessments and integrated them into the ASU accreditation effort. The results of this activity are described in this paper. The paper begins with a discussion of the similarities of CMM and ABET. Both technical and nontechnical similarities such as the impact of employee / faculty buy-in and management / administrative support was addressed. A review of lessons learned from organizations engaging in CMM activities was presented in the context of how they might help academic organizations in their ABET activities and how ASU applied each lesson.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信