书评:冉冉升起的太阳之翼:日本航空的跨国历史,作者:j rgen P. Melzer

Kaori Takada
{"title":"书评:冉冉升起的太阳之翼:日本航空的跨国历史,作者:j<s:1> rgen P. Melzer","authors":"Kaori Takada","doi":"10.1177/00225266221074763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"absence of unpacking whiteness and a lack of reference to differentiation (including where poor white women stood in the hierarchy) within white societies is rather a surprise. At a related level, one of the arguments running through the chapters is the suggestion of going back to or recovering “Indigenous modes of relationship”. Conceptually, this argument too, is difficult to accept without considerable historicisation and scrutiny. Once again, this is not to suggest war-finance nexus and corporate capitalism was/is the key to socio-economic salvation of humanity. But, as historians (anthropologists and sociologists) of pre-colonial societies have shown, pre-colonial does not necessarily translate as more equitable or redistributive. At best, this is a romantic view of precolonial/Indigenous societies; at worst, it is a-historic. Claiming Indigenous selfdetermination as the only path forward ignores the complex realties such as how ex-colonies like India and China played a pivotal role in watering down the climate pledge of recently held COP26. Equally problematic will be the idea that if were to pursue Indigenous self-determination then who would be considered truly “indigenous” – will it include Uighurs in China or Muslims or low caste Hindus in India? This book underlines well the historical interrelation between capital and imperialism. But lack of conceptual clarity in key discussions and jargonistic language affects the overall tenor.","PeriodicalId":336494,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Transport History","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Wings for the Rising Sun: A Transnational History of Japanese Aviation by Jürgen P. Melzer\",\"authors\":\"Kaori Takada\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00225266221074763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"absence of unpacking whiteness and a lack of reference to differentiation (including where poor white women stood in the hierarchy) within white societies is rather a surprise. At a related level, one of the arguments running through the chapters is the suggestion of going back to or recovering “Indigenous modes of relationship”. Conceptually, this argument too, is difficult to accept without considerable historicisation and scrutiny. Once again, this is not to suggest war-finance nexus and corporate capitalism was/is the key to socio-economic salvation of humanity. But, as historians (anthropologists and sociologists) of pre-colonial societies have shown, pre-colonial does not necessarily translate as more equitable or redistributive. At best, this is a romantic view of precolonial/Indigenous societies; at worst, it is a-historic. Claiming Indigenous selfdetermination as the only path forward ignores the complex realties such as how ex-colonies like India and China played a pivotal role in watering down the climate pledge of recently held COP26. Equally problematic will be the idea that if were to pursue Indigenous self-determination then who would be considered truly “indigenous” – will it include Uighurs in China or Muslims or low caste Hindus in India? This book underlines well the historical interrelation between capital and imperialism. But lack of conceptual clarity in key discussions and jargonistic language affects the overall tenor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Transport History\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Transport History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266221074763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Transport History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266221074763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在白人社会中,没有对白人身份进行拆解,也没有提及差异(包括贫穷的白人女性在等级制度中的地位),这相当令人惊讶。在一个相关的层面上,贯穿各章的论点之一是建议回到或恢复“土著关系模式”。从概念上讲,如果不进行相当程度的历史化和审视,这种观点也很难被接受。再一次,这并不是说战争金融联系和公司资本主义是拯救人类社会经济的关键。但是,正如研究前殖民社会的历史学家(人类学家和社会学家)所表明的那样,前殖民并不一定意味着更加公平或再分配。充其量,这是一种对前殖民/土著社会的浪漫看法;最坏的情况是,这是历史性的。声称土著自决是唯一的前进道路,忽视了复杂的现实,比如印度和中国等前殖民地如何在削弱最近举行的COP26气候承诺方面发挥了关键作用。同样有问题的是,如果我们追求土著自决,那么谁将被视为真正的“土著”——是包括中国的维吾尔人、穆斯林还是印度的低种姓印度教徒?这本书很好地强调了资本主义和帝国主义之间的历史相互关系。但在关键的讨论和术语的语言缺乏概念的清晰度影响了整体的基调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Wings for the Rising Sun: A Transnational History of Japanese Aviation by Jürgen P. Melzer
absence of unpacking whiteness and a lack of reference to differentiation (including where poor white women stood in the hierarchy) within white societies is rather a surprise. At a related level, one of the arguments running through the chapters is the suggestion of going back to or recovering “Indigenous modes of relationship”. Conceptually, this argument too, is difficult to accept without considerable historicisation and scrutiny. Once again, this is not to suggest war-finance nexus and corporate capitalism was/is the key to socio-economic salvation of humanity. But, as historians (anthropologists and sociologists) of pre-colonial societies have shown, pre-colonial does not necessarily translate as more equitable or redistributive. At best, this is a romantic view of precolonial/Indigenous societies; at worst, it is a-historic. Claiming Indigenous selfdetermination as the only path forward ignores the complex realties such as how ex-colonies like India and China played a pivotal role in watering down the climate pledge of recently held COP26. Equally problematic will be the idea that if were to pursue Indigenous self-determination then who would be considered truly “indigenous” – will it include Uighurs in China or Muslims or low caste Hindus in India? This book underlines well the historical interrelation between capital and imperialism. But lack of conceptual clarity in key discussions and jargonistic language affects the overall tenor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信