收集影响者:在线网络爬虫的比较研究

Mikhail Drobyshevskiy, Denis Aivazov, D. Turdakov, A. Yatskov, M. Varlamov, Danil Shayhelislamov
{"title":"收集影响者:在线网络爬虫的比较研究","authors":"Mikhail Drobyshevskiy, Denis Aivazov, D. Turdakov, A. Yatskov, M. Varlamov, Danil Shayhelislamov","doi":"10.1109/ISPRAS47671.2019.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online network crawling tasks require a lot of efforts for the researchers to collect the data. One of them is identification of important nodes, which has many applications starting from viral marketing to the prevention of disease spread. Various crawling algorithms has been suggested but their efficiency is not studied well. In this paper we compared six known crawlers on the task of collecting the fraction of the most influential nodes of graph. We analyzed crawlers behavior for four measures of node influence: node degree, k-coreness, betweenness centrality, and eccentricity. The experiments confirmed that greedy methods perform the best in many settings, but the cases exist when they are very inefficient.","PeriodicalId":154688,"journal":{"name":"2019 Ivannikov Ispras Open Conference (ISPRAS)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collecting Influencers: A Comparative Study of Online Network Crawlers\",\"authors\":\"Mikhail Drobyshevskiy, Denis Aivazov, D. Turdakov, A. Yatskov, M. Varlamov, Danil Shayhelislamov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPRAS47671.2019.00012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online network crawling tasks require a lot of efforts for the researchers to collect the data. One of them is identification of important nodes, which has many applications starting from viral marketing to the prevention of disease spread. Various crawling algorithms has been suggested but their efficiency is not studied well. In this paper we compared six known crawlers on the task of collecting the fraction of the most influential nodes of graph. We analyzed crawlers behavior for four measures of node influence: node degree, k-coreness, betweenness centrality, and eccentricity. The experiments confirmed that greedy methods perform the best in many settings, but the cases exist when they are very inefficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Ivannikov Ispras Open Conference (ISPRAS)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Ivannikov Ispras Open Conference (ISPRAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPRAS47671.2019.00012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Ivannikov Ispras Open Conference (ISPRAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPRAS47671.2019.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在线网络爬行任务需要研究人员花费大量精力来收集数据。其中之一是重要节点的识别,它有许多应用,从病毒营销到预防疾病传播。人们提出了各种各样的爬行算法,但对它们的效率并没有很好的研究。在本文中,我们比较了六种已知的爬虫在收集图中最具影响力节点的分数的任务上。我们分析了爬虫行为的节点影响的四个措施:节点度,k-核心,中间中心性和偏心。实验证实,贪心方法在许多情况下都表现最好,但也存在效率很低的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collecting Influencers: A Comparative Study of Online Network Crawlers
Online network crawling tasks require a lot of efforts for the researchers to collect the data. One of them is identification of important nodes, which has many applications starting from viral marketing to the prevention of disease spread. Various crawling algorithms has been suggested but their efficiency is not studied well. In this paper we compared six known crawlers on the task of collecting the fraction of the most influential nodes of graph. We analyzed crawlers behavior for four measures of node influence: node degree, k-coreness, betweenness centrality, and eccentricity. The experiments confirmed that greedy methods perform the best in many settings, but the cases exist when they are very inefficient.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信