现代的、不合时宜的和行星的:拉纳吉特·古哈的100年

P. Banerjee
{"title":"现代的、不合时宜的和行星的:拉纳吉特·古哈的100年","authors":"P. Banerjee","doi":"10.1215/26410478-10800321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This essay is a critical homage to Ranajit Guha, who passed away recently in his hundredth year. Through a rereading of Guha's bilingual oeuvre—including his later writings in Bengali—the essay explores Guha’s rethinking of time as he moved from Marxism to a critique of historicism to a disavowal of history to postcolonial criticism and ultimately to a cosmopolitical stance. It suggests that Guha’s most important contribution to global critical theory is not his historiographical achievements but his unique phenomenology of time. Mobilizing both modern and non-modern semiotic, grammatological, and aesthetic traditions, Guha reconceived time as a function of the limits and possibilities of human language and argued that common lives and subaltern subjects could not be accessed without admitting to the heterogenous temporal constitution—\"time-knots” as he would call them—of the contemporary. Thinking with Guha helps us make the general argument that emancipatory politics demands a radical reopening of the question of time and a stepping aside of the framework of modernity—an argument that other erstwhile Subaltern Studies authors such as Dipesh Chakrabarty and Partha Chatterjee have recently made. The essay understands Guha's century-long political and intellectual journey as a metonym for our times, marked by an agonistic and unpredictable interplay of multiple pasts, losses, emergences, and futures.","PeriodicalId":432097,"journal":{"name":"Critical Times","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Modern, the Untimely, and the Planetary: 100 Years of Ranajit Guha\",\"authors\":\"P. Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/26410478-10800321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This essay is a critical homage to Ranajit Guha, who passed away recently in his hundredth year. Through a rereading of Guha's bilingual oeuvre—including his later writings in Bengali—the essay explores Guha’s rethinking of time as he moved from Marxism to a critique of historicism to a disavowal of history to postcolonial criticism and ultimately to a cosmopolitical stance. It suggests that Guha’s most important contribution to global critical theory is not his historiographical achievements but his unique phenomenology of time. Mobilizing both modern and non-modern semiotic, grammatological, and aesthetic traditions, Guha reconceived time as a function of the limits and possibilities of human language and argued that common lives and subaltern subjects could not be accessed without admitting to the heterogenous temporal constitution—\\\"time-knots” as he would call them—of the contemporary. Thinking with Guha helps us make the general argument that emancipatory politics demands a radical reopening of the question of time and a stepping aside of the framework of modernity—an argument that other erstwhile Subaltern Studies authors such as Dipesh Chakrabarty and Partha Chatterjee have recently made. The essay understands Guha's century-long political and intellectual journey as a metonym for our times, marked by an agonistic and unpredictable interplay of multiple pasts, losses, emergences, and futures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Times\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Times\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-10800321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Times","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-10800321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对拉纳吉特·古哈(Ranajit Guha)的重要致敬,他最近去世,享年100岁。通过重读古哈的双语作品——包括他后来用孟加拉语写的作品——本文探讨了古哈从马克思主义到对历史主义的批判,再到对历史的否定,再到后殖民主义批评,最终到世界政治立场,他对时间的重新思考。这表明古哈对全球批判理论最重要的贡献不是他的史学成就,而是他独特的时间现象学。调动现代和非现代的符号学、语法学和美学传统,古哈将时间重新视为人类语言的局限性和可能性的功能,并认为,如果不承认当代的异质时间结构——他称之为“时间结”——就无法访问普通生活和次要主体。与古哈一起思考有助于我们得出这样一个普遍的论点:解放政治需要彻底地重新审视时间问题,并把现代性的框架放在一边——这是其他前《下层研究》作者(如迪佩什·查克拉巴蒂和帕塔·查特吉)最近提出的一个论点。这篇文章将古哈长达一个世纪的政治和思想之旅理解为我们这个时代的转喻,这个时代的标志是多种过去、损失、出现和未来之间激烈而不可预测的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Modern, the Untimely, and the Planetary: 100 Years of Ranajit Guha
This essay is a critical homage to Ranajit Guha, who passed away recently in his hundredth year. Through a rereading of Guha's bilingual oeuvre—including his later writings in Bengali—the essay explores Guha’s rethinking of time as he moved from Marxism to a critique of historicism to a disavowal of history to postcolonial criticism and ultimately to a cosmopolitical stance. It suggests that Guha’s most important contribution to global critical theory is not his historiographical achievements but his unique phenomenology of time. Mobilizing both modern and non-modern semiotic, grammatological, and aesthetic traditions, Guha reconceived time as a function of the limits and possibilities of human language and argued that common lives and subaltern subjects could not be accessed without admitting to the heterogenous temporal constitution—"time-knots” as he would call them—of the contemporary. Thinking with Guha helps us make the general argument that emancipatory politics demands a radical reopening of the question of time and a stepping aside of the framework of modernity—an argument that other erstwhile Subaltern Studies authors such as Dipesh Chakrabarty and Partha Chatterjee have recently made. The essay understands Guha's century-long political and intellectual journey as a metonym for our times, marked by an agonistic and unpredictable interplay of multiple pasts, losses, emergences, and futures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信