M. Sarkar, P. Desai, Shantaram Pawaskar, S. Sarkar
{"title":"静脉注射右美托咪定与对乙酰氨基酚缓解腹腔镜手术术后疼痛的比较研究","authors":"M. Sarkar, P. Desai, Shantaram Pawaskar, S. Sarkar","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11960d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute pain in the perioperative setting is detrimental to post operative outcome and adequate analgesia leads to better outcome. It increases sympathetic response of the body with subsequent rise in oxygen consumption of body, risk of deep vein thrombosis due to immobility and consequent pulmonary embolism.\nMethods: Sixty ASA I/II patients between 18- 65 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendicectomy were included and randomly divided into 2 groups. ASA III/IV patients, previous opioid and alpha 2 agonist treatment and patients requiring extensive surgical dissection were excluded. Group D received IV Dexmedetomidine 1 \\(\\mu\\)g/kg over 10 min followed by 0.2-0.7 \\(\\mu\\)g /kg/hr and Group P received IV Paracetamol 15 mg/kg prior to extubation. Patients were monitored for hemodynamics and VAS score was assessed after extubation till 24 hours. Rescue analgesia (IV tramadol 1 mg/kg) was given and the time interval till the requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia was recorded.\nResults: In group D, 12 patients required rescue analgesia as compared to 4 Patients in group P (40% vs13.3%; P=0.02). VAS scores were similar in both groups with group P showing trend towards low score. Median time at which the first dose of rescue analgesia was administered in group P was longer (134.42 + 12.67 vs 82.76 + 9.38 min; P=0.001). Incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in group D (20% vs 3.3%; P=0.04).\nConclusion: Paracetamol is a superior to Dexmedetomidine for analgesia in short surgical procedures and should form a part of multimodal analgesia.","PeriodicalId":231604,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Paracetamol for Postoperative Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Sarkar, P. Desai, Shantaram Pawaskar, S. Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11960d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Acute pain in the perioperative setting is detrimental to post operative outcome and adequate analgesia leads to better outcome. It increases sympathetic response of the body with subsequent rise in oxygen consumption of body, risk of deep vein thrombosis due to immobility and consequent pulmonary embolism.\\nMethods: Sixty ASA I/II patients between 18- 65 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendicectomy were included and randomly divided into 2 groups. ASA III/IV patients, previous opioid and alpha 2 agonist treatment and patients requiring extensive surgical dissection were excluded. Group D received IV Dexmedetomidine 1 \\\\(\\\\mu\\\\)g/kg over 10 min followed by 0.2-0.7 \\\\(\\\\mu\\\\)g /kg/hr and Group P received IV Paracetamol 15 mg/kg prior to extubation. Patients were monitored for hemodynamics and VAS score was assessed after extubation till 24 hours. Rescue analgesia (IV tramadol 1 mg/kg) was given and the time interval till the requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia was recorded.\\nResults: In group D, 12 patients required rescue analgesia as compared to 4 Patients in group P (40% vs13.3%; P=0.02). VAS scores were similar in both groups with group P showing trend towards low score. Median time at which the first dose of rescue analgesia was administered in group P was longer (134.42 + 12.67 vs 82.76 + 9.38 min; P=0.001). Incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in group D (20% vs 3.3%; P=0.04).\\nConclusion: Paracetamol is a superior to Dexmedetomidine for analgesia in short surgical procedures and should form a part of multimodal analgesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11960d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11960d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:围手术期急性疼痛不利于术后预后,适当的镇痛可获得较好的预后。它增加了身体的交感神经反应,随后增加了身体的耗氧量,增加了由于不活动而形成深静脉血栓的风险,并导致肺栓塞。方法:选取年龄在18 ~ 65岁之间行腹腔镜胆囊阑尾切除术的ASA I/II级患者60例,随机分为2组。排除ASA III/IV患者、既往阿片类药物和α 2激动剂治疗和需要广泛手术解剖的患者。D组静脉滴注右美托咪定1 \(\mu\) g/kg,持续10 min,随后滴注0.2 ~ 0.7 \(\mu\) g/kg /hr, P组拔管前静脉滴注扑热息痛15 mg/kg。拔管后24小时监测患者血流动力学及VAS评分。给予静脉曲马多1 mg/kg抢救镇痛,记录到需要第一次抢救镇痛的时间间隔。结果:D组12例患者需要抢救性镇痛,P组4例患者需要抢救性镇痛% vs13.3%; P=0.02). VAS scores were similar in both groups with group P showing trend towards low score. Median time at which the first dose of rescue analgesia was administered in group P was longer (134.42 + 12.67 vs 82.76 + 9.38 min; P=0.001). Incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in group D (20% vs 3.3%; P=0.04).Conclusion: Paracetamol is a superior to Dexmedetomidine for analgesia in short surgical procedures and should form a part of multimodal analgesia.
Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Paracetamol for Postoperative Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparative Study
Background: Acute pain in the perioperative setting is detrimental to post operative outcome and adequate analgesia leads to better outcome. It increases sympathetic response of the body with subsequent rise in oxygen consumption of body, risk of deep vein thrombosis due to immobility and consequent pulmonary embolism.
Methods: Sixty ASA I/II patients between 18- 65 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendicectomy were included and randomly divided into 2 groups. ASA III/IV patients, previous opioid and alpha 2 agonist treatment and patients requiring extensive surgical dissection were excluded. Group D received IV Dexmedetomidine 1 \(\mu\)g/kg over 10 min followed by 0.2-0.7 \(\mu\)g /kg/hr and Group P received IV Paracetamol 15 mg/kg prior to extubation. Patients were monitored for hemodynamics and VAS score was assessed after extubation till 24 hours. Rescue analgesia (IV tramadol 1 mg/kg) was given and the time interval till the requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia was recorded.
Results: In group D, 12 patients required rescue analgesia as compared to 4 Patients in group P (40% vs13.3%; P=0.02). VAS scores were similar in both groups with group P showing trend towards low score. Median time at which the first dose of rescue analgesia was administered in group P was longer (134.42 + 12.67 vs 82.76 + 9.38 min; P=0.001). Incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in group D (20% vs 3.3%; P=0.04).
Conclusion: Paracetamol is a superior to Dexmedetomidine for analgesia in short surgical procedures and should form a part of multimodal analgesia.