静脉注射右美托咪定与对乙酰氨基酚缓解腹腔镜手术术后疼痛的比较研究

M. Sarkar, P. Desai, Shantaram Pawaskar, S. Sarkar
{"title":"静脉注射右美托咪定与对乙酰氨基酚缓解腹腔镜手术术后疼痛的比较研究","authors":"M. Sarkar, P. Desai, Shantaram Pawaskar, S. Sarkar","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11960d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Acute pain in the perioperative setting is detrimental to post operative outcome and adequate analgesia leads to better outcome. It increases sympathetic response of the body with subsequent rise in oxygen consumption of body, risk of deep vein thrombosis due to immobility and consequent pulmonary embolism.\nMethods: Sixty ASA I/II patients between 18- 65 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendicectomy were included and randomly divided into 2 groups. ASA III/IV patients, previous opioid and alpha 2 agonist treatment and patients requiring extensive surgical dissection were excluded. Group D received IV Dexmedetomidine 1 \\(\\mu\\)g/kg over 10 min followed by 0.2-0.7 \\(\\mu\\)g /kg/hr and Group P received IV Paracetamol 15 mg/kg prior to extubation. Patients were monitored for hemodynamics and VAS score was assessed after extubation till 24 hours. Rescue analgesia (IV tramadol 1 mg/kg) was given and the time interval till the requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia was recorded.\nResults: In group D, 12 patients required rescue analgesia as compared to 4 Patients in group P (40% vs13.3%; P=0.02). VAS scores were similar in both groups with group P showing trend towards low score. Median time at which the first dose of rescue analgesia was administered in group P was longer (134.42 + 12.67 vs 82.76 + 9.38 min; P=0.001). Incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in group D (20% vs 3.3%; P=0.04).\nConclusion: Paracetamol is a superior to Dexmedetomidine for analgesia in short surgical procedures and should form a part of multimodal analgesia.","PeriodicalId":231604,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Paracetamol for Postoperative Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Sarkar, P. Desai, Shantaram Pawaskar, S. Sarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11960d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Acute pain in the perioperative setting is detrimental to post operative outcome and adequate analgesia leads to better outcome. It increases sympathetic response of the body with subsequent rise in oxygen consumption of body, risk of deep vein thrombosis due to immobility and consequent pulmonary embolism.\\nMethods: Sixty ASA I/II patients between 18- 65 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendicectomy were included and randomly divided into 2 groups. ASA III/IV patients, previous opioid and alpha 2 agonist treatment and patients requiring extensive surgical dissection were excluded. Group D received IV Dexmedetomidine 1 \\\\(\\\\mu\\\\)g/kg over 10 min followed by 0.2-0.7 \\\\(\\\\mu\\\\)g /kg/hr and Group P received IV Paracetamol 15 mg/kg prior to extubation. Patients were monitored for hemodynamics and VAS score was assessed after extubation till 24 hours. Rescue analgesia (IV tramadol 1 mg/kg) was given and the time interval till the requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia was recorded.\\nResults: In group D, 12 patients required rescue analgesia as compared to 4 Patients in group P (40% vs13.3%; P=0.02). VAS scores were similar in both groups with group P showing trend towards low score. Median time at which the first dose of rescue analgesia was administered in group P was longer (134.42 + 12.67 vs 82.76 + 9.38 min; P=0.001). Incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in group D (20% vs 3.3%; P=0.04).\\nConclusion: Paracetamol is a superior to Dexmedetomidine for analgesia in short surgical procedures and should form a part of multimodal analgesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11960d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/11960d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围手术期急性疼痛不利于术后预后,适当的镇痛可获得较好的预后。它增加了身体的交感神经反应,随后增加了身体的耗氧量,增加了由于不活动而形成深静脉血栓的风险,并导致肺栓塞。方法:选取年龄在18 ~ 65岁之间行腹腔镜胆囊阑尾切除术的ASA I/II级患者60例,随机分为2组。排除ASA III/IV患者、既往阿片类药物和α 2激动剂治疗和需要广泛手术解剖的患者。D组静脉滴注右美托咪定1 \(\mu\) g/kg,持续10 min,随后滴注0.2 ~ 0.7 \(\mu\) g/kg /hr, P组拔管前静脉滴注扑热息痛15 mg/kg。拔管后24小时监测患者血流动力学及VAS评分。给予静脉曲马多1 mg/kg抢救镇痛,记录到需要第一次抢救镇痛的时间间隔。结果:D组12例患者需要抢救性镇痛,P组4例患者需要抢救性镇痛% vs13.3%; P=0.02). VAS scores were similar in both groups with group P showing trend towards low score. Median time at which the first dose of rescue analgesia was administered in group P was longer (134.42 + 12.67 vs 82.76 + 9.38 min; P=0.001). Incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in group D (20% vs 3.3%; P=0.04).Conclusion: Paracetamol is a superior to Dexmedetomidine for analgesia in short surgical procedures and should form a part of multimodal analgesia.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Paracetamol for Postoperative Pain Relief in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Comparative Study
Background: Acute pain in the perioperative setting is detrimental to post operative outcome and adequate analgesia leads to better outcome. It increases sympathetic response of the body with subsequent rise in oxygen consumption of body, risk of deep vein thrombosis due to immobility and consequent pulmonary embolism. Methods: Sixty ASA I/II patients between 18- 65 years undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendicectomy were included and randomly divided into 2 groups. ASA III/IV patients, previous opioid and alpha 2 agonist treatment and patients requiring extensive surgical dissection were excluded. Group D received IV Dexmedetomidine 1 \(\mu\)g/kg over 10 min followed by 0.2-0.7 \(\mu\)g /kg/hr and Group P received IV Paracetamol 15 mg/kg prior to extubation. Patients were monitored for hemodynamics and VAS score was assessed after extubation till 24 hours. Rescue analgesia (IV tramadol 1 mg/kg) was given and the time interval till the requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia was recorded. Results: In group D, 12 patients required rescue analgesia as compared to 4 Patients in group P (40% vs13.3%; P=0.02). VAS scores were similar in both groups with group P showing trend towards low score. Median time at which the first dose of rescue analgesia was administered in group P was longer (134.42 + 12.67 vs 82.76 + 9.38 min; P=0.001). Incidence of bradycardia and hypotension was higher in group D (20% vs 3.3%; P=0.04). Conclusion: Paracetamol is a superior to Dexmedetomidine for analgesia in short surgical procedures and should form a part of multimodal analgesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信