液体之爱、跨人道主义与优生学:后性别犹太女性主义思想的悖论

E. Ramon
{"title":"液体之爱、跨人道主义与优生学:后性别犹太女性主义思想的悖论","authors":"E. Ramon","doi":"10.31826/mjj-2019-130115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My essay critiques concepts of “family fluidity” in the works of three leading American Jewish feminist thinkers: Judith Plaskow, Rachel Adler and Martha Ackelsberg. Based on “queer theory,” they question the very distinction between “man” and “woman” and the legitimacy of educating for a covenant between them. The term “fluidity” is borrowed from the works Zygmunt Bauman. In his book Liquid Love (2003), he criticizes the fluidity of boundaries in the sexual behavior of post-modern Western inhabitants. I address the serious bio-ethical challenges that follow the disintegration of these identities, ignored by feminist Jewish American thinkers.","PeriodicalId":305040,"journal":{"name":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquid Love, Trans-Humanism and Eugenics: On Paradoxes in Post- Gender Jewish Feminist Thought\",\"authors\":\"E. Ramon\",\"doi\":\"10.31826/mjj-2019-130115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"My essay critiques concepts of “family fluidity” in the works of three leading American Jewish feminist thinkers: Judith Plaskow, Rachel Adler and Martha Ackelsberg. Based on “queer theory,” they question the very distinction between “man” and “woman” and the legitimacy of educating for a covenant between them. The term “fluidity” is borrowed from the works Zygmunt Bauman. In his book Liquid Love (2003), he criticizes the fluidity of boundaries in the sexual behavior of post-modern Western inhabitants. I address the serious bio-ethical challenges that follow the disintegration of these identities, ignored by feminist Jewish American thinkers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31826/mjj-2019-130115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31826/mjj-2019-130115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我的文章批评了三位美国犹太女权主义思想家的作品中的“家庭流动性”概念:朱迪思·普拉斯科、雷切尔·阿德勒和玛莎·阿克斯伯格。基于“酷儿理论”,他们质疑“男人”和“女人”之间的区别,以及为他们之间的契约进行教育的合法性。“流动性”一词借用自齐格蒙特·鲍曼的作品。在他的书《流动的爱》(2003)中,他批评了后现代西方居民性行为中界限的流动性。我谈到了这些身份解体后所带来的严重的生物伦理挑战,这些挑战被女权主义的美国犹太思想家所忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liquid Love, Trans-Humanism and Eugenics: On Paradoxes in Post- Gender Jewish Feminist Thought
My essay critiques concepts of “family fluidity” in the works of three leading American Jewish feminist thinkers: Judith Plaskow, Rachel Adler and Martha Ackelsberg. Based on “queer theory,” they question the very distinction between “man” and “woman” and the legitimacy of educating for a covenant between them. The term “fluidity” is borrowed from the works Zygmunt Bauman. In his book Liquid Love (2003), he criticizes the fluidity of boundaries in the sexual behavior of post-modern Western inhabitants. I address the serious bio-ethical challenges that follow the disintegration of these identities, ignored by feminist Jewish American thinkers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信