绘制地形:东盟经济共同体的印尼商业视角

Marko S. Hermawan, Lena Choong
{"title":"绘制地形:东盟经济共同体的印尼商业视角","authors":"Marko S. Hermawan, Lena Choong","doi":"10.21002/SEAM.V12I2.9730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research aims: This paper focuses on the institutions that the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) project will affect. By employing institutional logics theory, this study scrutinizes academics and business practitioners as institutions and the cultural context embedded within them. Methodology: A mixed method of newspaper data analysis and semi-structured interviews was used to obtain comprehensive data from both sources. Research findings: The findings suggest a definite orientation gap between business practitioners, associations, and academics-the three groups have less information and contributions compared with the government and association influences. This study concludes that more participation is needed from these institutions, which are currently feeling \"victimized\" and excluded by the project. Originality: The originality of this paper lies in its application of institutional logics to business perspectives within an Indonesian context. The framework offers a holistic approach to how people are institutionalized based on their macro-, meso-, and micro-environments. Managerial implications in the Southeast Asian context: There has been a lack of communication and coordination amongst these institutions. Therefore, this study guides the related institutions and helps them to map their roles in enhancing the AEC project. Research limitations and recommendations: This research has two limitations: 1) the lack of literature in this field, and 2) and the difficulty in accessing information from the government institutions. The paper offers avenues for further research: additional variables regarding Indonesian norms and values as well as a method for extending the research to other ASEAN members.","PeriodicalId":402277,"journal":{"name":"The South East Asian Journal of Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the Terrain: An Indonesian Business Perspective of the ASEAN Economic Community\",\"authors\":\"Marko S. Hermawan, Lena Choong\",\"doi\":\"10.21002/SEAM.V12I2.9730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research aims: This paper focuses on the institutions that the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) project will affect. By employing institutional logics theory, this study scrutinizes academics and business practitioners as institutions and the cultural context embedded within them. Methodology: A mixed method of newspaper data analysis and semi-structured interviews was used to obtain comprehensive data from both sources. Research findings: The findings suggest a definite orientation gap between business practitioners, associations, and academics-the three groups have less information and contributions compared with the government and association influences. This study concludes that more participation is needed from these institutions, which are currently feeling \\\"victimized\\\" and excluded by the project. Originality: The originality of this paper lies in its application of institutional logics to business perspectives within an Indonesian context. The framework offers a holistic approach to how people are institutionalized based on their macro-, meso-, and micro-environments. Managerial implications in the Southeast Asian context: There has been a lack of communication and coordination amongst these institutions. Therefore, this study guides the related institutions and helps them to map their roles in enhancing the AEC project. Research limitations and recommendations: This research has two limitations: 1) the lack of literature in this field, and 2) and the difficulty in accessing information from the government institutions. The paper offers avenues for further research: additional variables regarding Indonesian norms and values as well as a method for extending the research to other ASEAN members.\",\"PeriodicalId\":402277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The South East Asian Journal of Management\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The South East Asian Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21002/SEAM.V12I2.9730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The South East Asian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/SEAM.V12I2.9730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究目的:本文的研究重点是东盟经济共同体(AEC)项目将影响的机构。本研究运用制度逻辑理论,将学者与商业实践者视为制度,并检视其文化脉络。方法:采用报纸数据分析和半结构化访谈的混合方法,从两个来源获得综合数据。研究发现:研究结果表明,商业从业者、协会和学者之间存在明确的取向差距——与政府和协会的影响力相比,这三个群体的信息和贡献更少。这项研究的结论是,这些机构需要更多的参与,它们目前感到“受害”,被项目排斥在外。原创性:本文的原创性在于将制度逻辑应用于印度尼西亚背景下的商业视角。该框架提供了一种基于宏观、中观和微观环境的人如何制度化的整体方法。东南亚背景下的管理影响:这些机构之间缺乏沟通和协调。因此,本研究可以指导相关机构,并协助他们定位在推进AEC计划中的角色。研究的局限性和建议:本研究存在两个局限性:1)该领域文献的缺乏;2)从政府机构获取信息的困难。本文为进一步研究提供了途径:关于印度尼西亚规范和价值观的额外变量以及将研究扩展到其他东盟成员国的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mapping the Terrain: An Indonesian Business Perspective of the ASEAN Economic Community
Research aims: This paper focuses on the institutions that the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) project will affect. By employing institutional logics theory, this study scrutinizes academics and business practitioners as institutions and the cultural context embedded within them. Methodology: A mixed method of newspaper data analysis and semi-structured interviews was used to obtain comprehensive data from both sources. Research findings: The findings suggest a definite orientation gap between business practitioners, associations, and academics-the three groups have less information and contributions compared with the government and association influences. This study concludes that more participation is needed from these institutions, which are currently feeling "victimized" and excluded by the project. Originality: The originality of this paper lies in its application of institutional logics to business perspectives within an Indonesian context. The framework offers a holistic approach to how people are institutionalized based on their macro-, meso-, and micro-environments. Managerial implications in the Southeast Asian context: There has been a lack of communication and coordination amongst these institutions. Therefore, this study guides the related institutions and helps them to map their roles in enhancing the AEC project. Research limitations and recommendations: This research has two limitations: 1) the lack of literature in this field, and 2) and the difficulty in accessing information from the government institutions. The paper offers avenues for further research: additional variables regarding Indonesian norms and values as well as a method for extending the research to other ASEAN members.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信