关键词:乌克兰政治话语:语言文化学方面

Y. Yaremko
{"title":"关键词:乌克兰政治话语:语言文化学方面","authors":"Y. Yaremko","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-136-0/250-268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION National features of conceptosphere is considered by means history of words called key words. “When a learner masters a language and particularly meaning of the words they accept the world conceptualization typical of certain culture. Thus, the words that contain linguospecific concepts both “reflect” and “establish” the natives’ way of thinking 1 . The headline of monography by A. Vezhbytska “Culture Comprehension through the Key Words” renders the cumulative potency of these words 2 . According to the researcher, “the culture analysis cannot ignore the importance of the semantic consideration of culture. The relevance of semantics is never restricted by the lexical semantics but it is unlikely to reveal with the same intensity in any other sphere 3 ”. State as one of the key words in a political culture. The internal (implicit) structure of the word state defined as “the territory characterized as integrity from the point of view of history, people and political order 4 ” etymologically related to Protoslavic *drћati “to hold; to own” 5 . The idea of state in this meaning is widened by the synonyms krayina (country), zemlia (land), tsarstvo (kingdom), papstvo (popedom), krai (land), storona (land). Syntagmatically the last two components can combine with the words nash (our), ridnyi (native). In this case it is necessary to find out when these associative attributes could have combined with the word state. The relation nasha derzhava (our state), ridna derzhava (native state)","PeriodicalId":355299,"journal":{"name":"DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF MODERN LINGUISTICS IN THE EPOCH OF GLOBALIZATION","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KEY WORDS OF THE UKRAINIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE: LINGUOCULTUROLOGICAL ASPECT\",\"authors\":\"Y. Yaremko\",\"doi\":\"10.36059/978-966-397-136-0/250-268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION National features of conceptosphere is considered by means history of words called key words. “When a learner masters a language and particularly meaning of the words they accept the world conceptualization typical of certain culture. Thus, the words that contain linguospecific concepts both “reflect” and “establish” the natives’ way of thinking 1 . The headline of monography by A. Vezhbytska “Culture Comprehension through the Key Words” renders the cumulative potency of these words 2 . According to the researcher, “the culture analysis cannot ignore the importance of the semantic consideration of culture. The relevance of semantics is never restricted by the lexical semantics but it is unlikely to reveal with the same intensity in any other sphere 3 ”. State as one of the key words in a political culture. The internal (implicit) structure of the word state defined as “the territory characterized as integrity from the point of view of history, people and political order 4 ” etymologically related to Protoslavic *drћati “to hold; to own” 5 . The idea of state in this meaning is widened by the synonyms krayina (country), zemlia (land), tsarstvo (kingdom), papstvo (popedom), krai (land), storona (land). Syntagmatically the last two components can combine with the words nash (our), ridnyi (native). In this case it is necessary to find out when these associative attributes could have combined with the word state. The relation nasha derzhava (our state), ridna derzhava (native state)\",\"PeriodicalId\":355299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF MODERN LINGUISTICS IN THE EPOCH OF GLOBALIZATION\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF MODERN LINGUISTICS IN THE EPOCH OF GLOBALIZATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-136-0/250-268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF MODERN LINGUISTICS IN THE EPOCH OF GLOBALIZATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-136-0/250-268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

概念圈的民族特征是通过关键词的词汇史来考虑的。“当学习者掌握了一门语言,特别是单词的意思时,他们接受了某种文化典型的世界概念化。因此,包含特定语言概念的单词既“反映”又“确立”了当地人的思维方式。A. Vezhbytska的专著《通过关键词理解文化》的标题呈现了这些词的累积效力。研究者认为,“文化分析不能忽视文化语义考虑的重要性。语义学的相关性从未受到词汇语义学的限制,但它不太可能在任何其他领域以同样的强度显示出来。国家是政治文化中的关键词之一。国家这个词的内部(隐含)结构被定义为“从历史、人民和政治秩序的角度来看,具有完整特征的领土”,词源上与原斯拉夫语*drћati有关;“拥有”5。在这个意义上,国家的概念被同义词krayina(国家)、zemlia(土地)、tsarstvo(王国)、papstvo(教皇)、krai(土地)、storona(土地)所扩大。从句法上讲,后两个成分可以与nash(我们的),ridnyi(本地的)这两个词组合在一起。在这种情况下,有必要找出这些关联属性何时可以与单词state结合在一起。关系nasha derzhava(我们的国家),ridna derzhava(原生国家)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KEY WORDS OF THE UKRAINIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE: LINGUOCULTUROLOGICAL ASPECT
INTRODUCTION National features of conceptosphere is considered by means history of words called key words. “When a learner masters a language and particularly meaning of the words they accept the world conceptualization typical of certain culture. Thus, the words that contain linguospecific concepts both “reflect” and “establish” the natives’ way of thinking 1 . The headline of monography by A. Vezhbytska “Culture Comprehension through the Key Words” renders the cumulative potency of these words 2 . According to the researcher, “the culture analysis cannot ignore the importance of the semantic consideration of culture. The relevance of semantics is never restricted by the lexical semantics but it is unlikely to reveal with the same intensity in any other sphere 3 ”. State as one of the key words in a political culture. The internal (implicit) structure of the word state defined as “the territory characterized as integrity from the point of view of history, people and political order 4 ” etymologically related to Protoslavic *drћati “to hold; to own” 5 . The idea of state in this meaning is widened by the synonyms krayina (country), zemlia (land), tsarstvo (kingdom), papstvo (popedom), krai (land), storona (land). Syntagmatically the last two components can combine with the words nash (our), ridnyi (native). In this case it is necessary to find out when these associative attributes could have combined with the word state. The relation nasha derzhava (our state), ridna derzhava (native state)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信