{"title":"合成硬件系统的生存策略","authors":"M. Rinard","doi":"10.1109/MEMCOD.2009.5185387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Survival is a key concern of many complex systems. A standard approach to maximizing the likelihood of survival is to attempt to produce a system that is as free of errors as possible. We instead propose a methodology that changes the semantics of the underlying development and execution environments to cleanly and simply obtain survival guarantees that are difficult if not impossible to obtain with standard techniques. Examples of survival properties include continued execution in the face of addressing errors and guaranteed bounds on the amount of memory required during any execution of the system (even in the face of dynamic memory allocation).We summarize results for software implementations of these techniques and discuss issues and advantages that arise in the context of hardware implementations.","PeriodicalId":163970,"journal":{"name":"2009 7th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival strategies for synthesized hardware systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Rinard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MEMCOD.2009.5185387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Survival is a key concern of many complex systems. A standard approach to maximizing the likelihood of survival is to attempt to produce a system that is as free of errors as possible. We instead propose a methodology that changes the semantics of the underlying development and execution environments to cleanly and simply obtain survival guarantees that are difficult if not impossible to obtain with standard techniques. Examples of survival properties include continued execution in the face of addressing errors and guaranteed bounds on the amount of memory required during any execution of the system (even in the face of dynamic memory allocation).We summarize results for software implementations of these techniques and discuss issues and advantages that arise in the context of hardware implementations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":163970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 7th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 7th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMCOD.2009.5185387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 7th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for Co-Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMCOD.2009.5185387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survival strategies for synthesized hardware systems
Survival is a key concern of many complex systems. A standard approach to maximizing the likelihood of survival is to attempt to produce a system that is as free of errors as possible. We instead propose a methodology that changes the semantics of the underlying development and execution environments to cleanly and simply obtain survival guarantees that are difficult if not impossible to obtain with standard techniques. Examples of survival properties include continued execution in the face of addressing errors and guaranteed bounds on the amount of memory required during any execution of the system (even in the face of dynamic memory allocation).We summarize results for software implementations of these techniques and discuss issues and advantages that arise in the context of hardware implementations.