《示拉书》中定义圣训意义的方法:早期的研究

Ahmad Izzuddin Abu Bakar
{"title":"《示拉书》中定义圣训意义的方法:早期的研究","authors":"Ahmad Izzuddin Abu Bakar","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Syarah book or commentaries was embraced not only in the exposition of individual hadith of the Prophets SAW and hadith collections, but also in other sub disciplines such as the science of hadith transmission. The debate is so subtle and deep that it covers various types of knowledge. Therefore, there are difficulties in reviewing and filtering opinions on the meaning of hadith based on evidence (dalil). This article aims to identify and highlight the methods used by these books in establishing a meaning or description that coincides with the correct evidence and argumentations (pendalilan) or vice versa. The methodology used is the Library Method where relevant documents are collected and their contents are analyzed. A review of the practice of syarah books was conducted on selected sections of the following books; Fatḥ al-Bārī Šarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Buḫārī, Iršād al-Sārī Šarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Buḫārī, al-Mufhim Limā Uškila Min Talḫīs Saḥīḥ Muslim son of al-Tauḍīḥ Lišarḥ al-Jāmi ’al-Saḥīḥ. At least five (5) methods have been identified. First: List the Opinions and its Evidence (dalil), second: Discuss the Argumentations Used, third: State a View as Accurate (Rājiḥ), fourth: State the View is Not Based on Evidence or Argumentations That Are Not Strong and fifth: Indicate the Existence of Objection to a View. The findings of this study will ease the extraction of the meaning of the hadith that are aligned with the evidence of the syara’ (Islamic law).","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metode Kitab Syarah Dalam Menetapkan Makna Hadis Berpandukan Dalil: Suatu Penelitian Awal\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Izzuddin Abu Bakar\",\"doi\":\"10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Syarah book or commentaries was embraced not only in the exposition of individual hadith of the Prophets SAW and hadith collections, but also in other sub disciplines such as the science of hadith transmission. The debate is so subtle and deep that it covers various types of knowledge. Therefore, there are difficulties in reviewing and filtering opinions on the meaning of hadith based on evidence (dalil). This article aims to identify and highlight the methods used by these books in establishing a meaning or description that coincides with the correct evidence and argumentations (pendalilan) or vice versa. The methodology used is the Library Method where relevant documents are collected and their contents are analyzed. A review of the practice of syarah books was conducted on selected sections of the following books; Fatḥ al-Bārī Šarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Buḫārī, Iršād al-Sārī Šarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Buḫārī, al-Mufhim Limā Uškila Min Talḫīs Saḥīḥ Muslim son of al-Tauḍīḥ Lišarḥ al-Jāmi ’al-Saḥīḥ. At least five (5) methods have been identified. First: List the Opinions and its Evidence (dalil), second: Discuss the Argumentations Used, third: State a View as Accurate (Rājiḥ), fourth: State the View is Not Based on Evidence or Argumentations That Are Not Strong and fifth: Indicate the Existence of Objection to a View. The findings of this study will ease the extraction of the meaning of the hadith that are aligned with the evidence of the syara’ (Islamic law).\",\"PeriodicalId\":276672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伊斯兰书或注释不仅在先知的圣训和圣训集合中被接受,而且在其他分支学科中也被接受,比如圣训传播科学。这场争论是如此微妙和深刻,以至于它涵盖了各种各样的知识。因此,在审查和过滤基于证据(dalil)的圣训意义的意见时存在困难。本文旨在识别和强调这些书在建立与正确证据和论证(pendalilan)一致的意义或描述(反之亦然)时使用的方法。使用的方法是图书馆法,收集相关文献并分析其内容。对伊斯兰教书籍的实践进行了审查,审查了以下书籍的选定部分;脂肪ḥal-BārīŠarḥṢ一ḥīḥal-Buḫārī,红外šād地基ārīŠarḥṢ一ḥīḥal-Buḫārīal-Mufhim LimāUškila分钟Talḫī年代Saḥīḥ穆斯林的儿子al-Tauḍīḥ李šarḥal-Jāmi的al-Saḥīḥ。已确定至少五(5)种方法。第一:列出观点及其证据(dalil),第二:讨论所使用的论证,第三:陈述观点是准确的(Rājiḥ),第四:陈述观点不是基于不有力的证据或论证,第五:表明对观点存在反对意见。这项研究的发现将有助于提取与伊斯兰教法证据一致的圣训的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metode Kitab Syarah Dalam Menetapkan Makna Hadis Berpandukan Dalil: Suatu Penelitian Awal
Syarah book or commentaries was embraced not only in the exposition of individual hadith of the Prophets SAW and hadith collections, but also in other sub disciplines such as the science of hadith transmission. The debate is so subtle and deep that it covers various types of knowledge. Therefore, there are difficulties in reviewing and filtering opinions on the meaning of hadith based on evidence (dalil). This article aims to identify and highlight the methods used by these books in establishing a meaning or description that coincides with the correct evidence and argumentations (pendalilan) or vice versa. The methodology used is the Library Method where relevant documents are collected and their contents are analyzed. A review of the practice of syarah books was conducted on selected sections of the following books; Fatḥ al-Bārī Šarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Buḫārī, Iršād al-Sārī Šarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ al-Buḫārī, al-Mufhim Limā Uškila Min Talḫīs Saḥīḥ Muslim son of al-Tauḍīḥ Lišarḥ al-Jāmi ’al-Saḥīḥ. At least five (5) methods have been identified. First: List the Opinions and its Evidence (dalil), second: Discuss the Argumentations Used, third: State a View as Accurate (Rājiḥ), fourth: State the View is Not Based on Evidence or Argumentations That Are Not Strong and fifth: Indicate the Existence of Objection to a View. The findings of this study will ease the extraction of the meaning of the hadith that are aligned with the evidence of the syara’ (Islamic law).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信