利用数字工具设计综合混合学习体验

M. van Rooyen, D. C. Blaine, K. Wolff
{"title":"利用数字工具设计综合混合学习体验","authors":"M. van Rooyen, D. C. Blaine, K. Wolff","doi":"10.1109/WEEF-GEDC54384.2022.9996253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past decade has seen a redesign of engineering education to accommodate the supercomplexities of the modern world. In preparation for this world, integrative teaching and learning approaches that highlight connections between different concepts, and between theory and practice, develop the critical thinking attributes of engineering graduates. One means of facilitating integrative learning experiences that was further impelled by the COVID19 disruption is the adoption of digital tools within a hybrid module design. This paper presents and evaluates various digital interventions within an integrative, hybrid-learning mode applied to a content-dense materials science module in the second year of a Bachelor of Engineering degree programme. The evaluation focuses on analysing students' perceptions on the effectiveness of the different digital tools that were used to support integrated learning in a theory-rich module. Quantitative and qualitative feedback drawn from questionnaires revealed that, overall, students valued the well-structured, logical online format of the module and recommended this as a standard for other modules. Students also expressed appreciation for the explicit theory-practice links in the case studies and virtual practical sessions. Challenges with time management were also highlighted with students associating this with the wide range of activities that are employed in a hybrid, integrated approach to module design. Additionally, it was clear that there is a wide range of digital fluency across the student cohort. Students' level of competence relating to basic computer and data analysis skills directly influences their ability to engage and perform well in activities that required these skills, such as the projects and virtual practical sessions. It was concluded that the success of the current approach in preparing students for supercomplexity relies on restructuring other curricular items in a similar digitally aided integrative manner whilst providing support for time management and digital skills.","PeriodicalId":206250,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging digital tools to design an integrative hybrid learning experience\",\"authors\":\"M. van Rooyen, D. C. Blaine, K. Wolff\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WEEF-GEDC54384.2022.9996253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The past decade has seen a redesign of engineering education to accommodate the supercomplexities of the modern world. In preparation for this world, integrative teaching and learning approaches that highlight connections between different concepts, and between theory and practice, develop the critical thinking attributes of engineering graduates. One means of facilitating integrative learning experiences that was further impelled by the COVID19 disruption is the adoption of digital tools within a hybrid module design. This paper presents and evaluates various digital interventions within an integrative, hybrid-learning mode applied to a content-dense materials science module in the second year of a Bachelor of Engineering degree programme. The evaluation focuses on analysing students' perceptions on the effectiveness of the different digital tools that were used to support integrated learning in a theory-rich module. Quantitative and qualitative feedback drawn from questionnaires revealed that, overall, students valued the well-structured, logical online format of the module and recommended this as a standard for other modules. Students also expressed appreciation for the explicit theory-practice links in the case studies and virtual practical sessions. Challenges with time management were also highlighted with students associating this with the wide range of activities that are employed in a hybrid, integrated approach to module design. Additionally, it was clear that there is a wide range of digital fluency across the student cohort. Students' level of competence relating to basic computer and data analysis skills directly influences their ability to engage and perform well in activities that required these skills, such as the projects and virtual practical sessions. It was concluded that the success of the current approach in preparing students for supercomplexity relies on restructuring other curricular items in a similar digitally aided integrative manner whilst providing support for time management and digital skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC54384.2022.9996253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE IFEES World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC54384.2022.9996253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去十年见证了工程教育的重新设计,以适应现代世界的超级复杂性。在为这个世界做准备时,综合教学方法强调不同概念之间的联系,以及理论与实践之间的联系,培养工程毕业生的批判性思维属性。新冠肺炎疫情进一步推动了促进综合学习体验的一种手段是在混合模块设计中采用数字工具。本文介绍并评估了应用于工程学士学位课程第二年内容密集的材料科学模块的综合混合学习模式中的各种数字干预措施。评估的重点是分析学生对不同数字工具的有效性的看法,这些工具用于支持理论丰富的模块中的综合学习。从问卷中得出的定量和定性反馈显示,总体而言,学生们很重视该模块结构良好、逻辑合理的在线格式,并建议将其作为其他模块的标准。学生们还对案例研究和虚拟实践环节中明确的理论与实践联系表示赞赏。时间管理方面的挑战也被强调,学生们将其与广泛的活动联系起来,这些活动采用混合、综合的方法来进行模块设计。此外,很明显,整个学生群体的数字流利程度参差不齐。学生在基本计算机和数据分析技能方面的能力水平直接影响他们参与并在需要这些技能的活动中表现良好的能力,例如项目和虚拟实践课程。结论是,当前方法在帮助学生应对超级复杂性方面的成功依赖于以类似的数字辅助综合方式重组其他课程项目,同时为时间管理和数字技能提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leveraging digital tools to design an integrative hybrid learning experience
The past decade has seen a redesign of engineering education to accommodate the supercomplexities of the modern world. In preparation for this world, integrative teaching and learning approaches that highlight connections between different concepts, and between theory and practice, develop the critical thinking attributes of engineering graduates. One means of facilitating integrative learning experiences that was further impelled by the COVID19 disruption is the adoption of digital tools within a hybrid module design. This paper presents and evaluates various digital interventions within an integrative, hybrid-learning mode applied to a content-dense materials science module in the second year of a Bachelor of Engineering degree programme. The evaluation focuses on analysing students' perceptions on the effectiveness of the different digital tools that were used to support integrated learning in a theory-rich module. Quantitative and qualitative feedback drawn from questionnaires revealed that, overall, students valued the well-structured, logical online format of the module and recommended this as a standard for other modules. Students also expressed appreciation for the explicit theory-practice links in the case studies and virtual practical sessions. Challenges with time management were also highlighted with students associating this with the wide range of activities that are employed in a hybrid, integrated approach to module design. Additionally, it was clear that there is a wide range of digital fluency across the student cohort. Students' level of competence relating to basic computer and data analysis skills directly influences their ability to engage and perform well in activities that required these skills, such as the projects and virtual practical sessions. It was concluded that the success of the current approach in preparing students for supercomplexity relies on restructuring other curricular items in a similar digitally aided integrative manner whilst providing support for time management and digital skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信