联合物理治疗和足部血友病诊所的结果:患者感知和对踝关节出血和关节健康的影响

C. Dodd, Alis Trivelli, D. Stephensen, G. Evans, Miranda Foord
{"title":"联合物理治疗和足部血友病诊所的结果:患者感知和对踝关节出血和关节健康的影响","authors":"C. Dodd, Alis Trivelli, D. Stephensen, G. Evans, Miranda Foord","doi":"10.17225/jhp00153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The ankle joint is the most common site of bleeding for people with haemophilia (PWH) in the developed world. Recent surveys suggest that PWH do not always have access to non-surgical musculoskeletal interventions and that when provided; there is considerable heterogeneity in clinical practice. Aims To determine patient perceptions and the potential benefits of a new combined multidisciplinary physiotherapy-podiatry haemophilia clinic, and to observe the effect on frequency of bleeds and ankle joint Haemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS). Materials and methods PWH with a history of ankle bleeds, pain, foot and/or ankle deformities from a single UK haemophilia centre were referred to the clinic from December 2017 to December 2018. Pre- and post-intervention ankle joint HJHS data and ankle annualised joint bleed rate (AJBR) were collected together with a satisfaction questionnaire asking patients their views on the clinic's value, usefulness and their satisfaction after the initial appointment. Results Twenty-seven PWH (16 children and 11 adults) attended the clinic. All patients agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the new clinic. The combined multidisciplinary nature of the clinic meant that patients only needed to attend one appointment with the expertise of two professionals, rather than attending two separate appointments. All patients reported it “more useful to see the physiotherapist and podiatrist together”. There were no statistically significant differences in ankle AJBR or HJHS scores post-intervention compared to pre-intervention. Conclusion Establishing a multidisciplinary physiotherapy-podiatry clinic for PWH with a history of ankle bleeds, pain, foot and/or ankle deformities appears to increase patient satisfaction. We did not observe a significant change in ankle AJBR or ankle HJHS scores, suggesting they might not be sufficient to evaluate potential benefits to patients. A larger study incorporating validated tools, focusing on patient-reported foot function, pain, activity and quality of life is needed to confirm if there is any effect of a combined physiotherapy-podiatry intervention on ankle joint AJBR and function.","PeriodicalId":372940,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of a combined physiotherapy and podiatry haemophilia clinic: patient perceptions and the effect on ankle bleeds and joint health\",\"authors\":\"C. Dodd, Alis Trivelli, D. Stephensen, G. Evans, Miranda Foord\",\"doi\":\"10.17225/jhp00153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background The ankle joint is the most common site of bleeding for people with haemophilia (PWH) in the developed world. Recent surveys suggest that PWH do not always have access to non-surgical musculoskeletal interventions and that when provided; there is considerable heterogeneity in clinical practice. Aims To determine patient perceptions and the potential benefits of a new combined multidisciplinary physiotherapy-podiatry haemophilia clinic, and to observe the effect on frequency of bleeds and ankle joint Haemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS). Materials and methods PWH with a history of ankle bleeds, pain, foot and/or ankle deformities from a single UK haemophilia centre were referred to the clinic from December 2017 to December 2018. Pre- and post-intervention ankle joint HJHS data and ankle annualised joint bleed rate (AJBR) were collected together with a satisfaction questionnaire asking patients their views on the clinic's value, usefulness and their satisfaction after the initial appointment. Results Twenty-seven PWH (16 children and 11 adults) attended the clinic. All patients agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the new clinic. The combined multidisciplinary nature of the clinic meant that patients only needed to attend one appointment with the expertise of two professionals, rather than attending two separate appointments. All patients reported it “more useful to see the physiotherapist and podiatrist together”. There were no statistically significant differences in ankle AJBR or HJHS scores post-intervention compared to pre-intervention. Conclusion Establishing a multidisciplinary physiotherapy-podiatry clinic for PWH with a history of ankle bleeds, pain, foot and/or ankle deformities appears to increase patient satisfaction. We did not observe a significant change in ankle AJBR or ankle HJHS scores, suggesting they might not be sufficient to evaluate potential benefits to patients. A larger study incorporating validated tools, focusing on patient-reported foot function, pain, activity and quality of life is needed to confirm if there is any effect of a combined physiotherapy-podiatry intervention on ankle joint AJBR and function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17225/jhp00153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17225/jhp00153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要背景在发达国家,踝关节是血友病(PWH)患者最常见的出血部位。最近的调查表明,PWH并不总是能够获得非手术肌肉骨骼干预措施,当提供时;在临床实践中存在相当大的异质性。目的了解一个新的多学科联合物理治疗-足部血友病诊所的患者认知和潜在益处,并观察其对出血频率和踝关节血友病关节健康评分(HJHS)的影响。材料和方法2017年12月至2018年12月,来自英国血友病中心的有踝关节出血、疼痛、足部和/或踝关节畸形史的PWH患者被转介到诊所。收集干预前后的踝关节HJHS数据和踝关节年化出血率(AJBR),并填写满意度问卷,询问患者对诊所的价值、有用性和初次预约后的满意度。结果27例PWH患者(儿童16例,成人11例)就诊。所有病人都同意或强烈同意他们对新诊所感到满意。综合多学科性质的诊所意味着,病人只需要参加一次预约与两名专业人士的专业知识,而不是参加两个单独的预约。所有患者都报告说,“同时看物理治疗师和足病医生更有用”。干预后踝关节AJBR和HJHS评分与干预前比较无统计学差异。结论为有踝关节出血、疼痛、足部和/或踝关节畸形病史的PWH患者建立多学科物理治疗-足部诊所可提高患者满意度。我们没有观察到踝关节AJBR或踝关节HJHS评分的显著变化,这表明它们可能不足以评估对患者的潜在益处。需要一项更大的研究,结合有效的工具,关注患者报告的足部功能、疼痛、活动和生活质量,以确认物理治疗-足部联合干预是否对踝关节AJBR和功能有任何影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of a combined physiotherapy and podiatry haemophilia clinic: patient perceptions and the effect on ankle bleeds and joint health
Abstract Background The ankle joint is the most common site of bleeding for people with haemophilia (PWH) in the developed world. Recent surveys suggest that PWH do not always have access to non-surgical musculoskeletal interventions and that when provided; there is considerable heterogeneity in clinical practice. Aims To determine patient perceptions and the potential benefits of a new combined multidisciplinary physiotherapy-podiatry haemophilia clinic, and to observe the effect on frequency of bleeds and ankle joint Haemophilia Joint Health Scores (HJHS). Materials and methods PWH with a history of ankle bleeds, pain, foot and/or ankle deformities from a single UK haemophilia centre were referred to the clinic from December 2017 to December 2018. Pre- and post-intervention ankle joint HJHS data and ankle annualised joint bleed rate (AJBR) were collected together with a satisfaction questionnaire asking patients their views on the clinic's value, usefulness and their satisfaction after the initial appointment. Results Twenty-seven PWH (16 children and 11 adults) attended the clinic. All patients agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the new clinic. The combined multidisciplinary nature of the clinic meant that patients only needed to attend one appointment with the expertise of two professionals, rather than attending two separate appointments. All patients reported it “more useful to see the physiotherapist and podiatrist together”. There were no statistically significant differences in ankle AJBR or HJHS scores post-intervention compared to pre-intervention. Conclusion Establishing a multidisciplinary physiotherapy-podiatry clinic for PWH with a history of ankle bleeds, pain, foot and/or ankle deformities appears to increase patient satisfaction. We did not observe a significant change in ankle AJBR or ankle HJHS scores, suggesting they might not be sufficient to evaluate potential benefits to patients. A larger study incorporating validated tools, focusing on patient-reported foot function, pain, activity and quality of life is needed to confirm if there is any effect of a combined physiotherapy-podiatry intervention on ankle joint AJBR and function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信