商事法庭诉讼中的法庭辩论

N. Petrenko
{"title":"商事法庭诉讼中的法庭辩论","authors":"N. Petrenko","doi":"10.15421/391916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article researches the innovations of commercial court proceedings, and namely the Court debates. The participants of a case (Plaintiff, Defendant, their representatives and the third parties) give speeches at the end of a Court session. The Court debates are the final stage of the court proceedings and precede a Court decree of a case.\nThe court debates imply a court speech and the replies of the parties. This innovation incidental to general court proceedings.\nThe court debates are not practiced while summary jurisdiction. A court speech during the debates is a right and not an obligation of the Parties. In addition to that, non-practicing the court debates will not lead to court decree repeal of a case based on infringement of the rules of law.\nBut the research institute should not be underestimated, because only the court debates make it possible for the parties to prove their position based on the factual background of a case, the evidences gained at the prior stage and the legal foundation. Due to the fact that the debates are the innovation of the commercial court proceedings; they are to be scientifically researched in detail, their meaning, content and elements are to be determined. Simultaneously the research procedure reveals some shortcomings.\nThus the Rules of the Economic Procedure of Ukraine do not determine a distinct succession of the participants’ appearance in Court debates of a Court of original jurisdiction, and namely a succession of the participants’ appearance in Court should be determined by a Court. At the same time a lawmaker determines such succession during the court proceedings of a Court of appeal which complies with a sequence of the participants’ and their representatives’ speeches during appeal proceedings.\nThus, it is worth determining an imperative succession of the parties’ speeches in Court of original jurisdiction. It is also worth saying that the court debates provide execution of two main foundations of the commercial court proceedings, that is a principle of competitiveness of the parties and court decree validity.","PeriodicalId":228288,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COURT DEBATES AT COMMERCIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS\",\"authors\":\"N. Petrenko\",\"doi\":\"10.15421/391916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article researches the innovations of commercial court proceedings, and namely the Court debates. The participants of a case (Plaintiff, Defendant, their representatives and the third parties) give speeches at the end of a Court session. The Court debates are the final stage of the court proceedings and precede a Court decree of a case.\\nThe court debates imply a court speech and the replies of the parties. This innovation incidental to general court proceedings.\\nThe court debates are not practiced while summary jurisdiction. A court speech during the debates is a right and not an obligation of the Parties. In addition to that, non-practicing the court debates will not lead to court decree repeal of a case based on infringement of the rules of law.\\nBut the research institute should not be underestimated, because only the court debates make it possible for the parties to prove their position based on the factual background of a case, the evidences gained at the prior stage and the legal foundation. Due to the fact that the debates are the innovation of the commercial court proceedings; they are to be scientifically researched in detail, their meaning, content and elements are to be determined. Simultaneously the research procedure reveals some shortcomings.\\nThus the Rules of the Economic Procedure of Ukraine do not determine a distinct succession of the participants’ appearance in Court debates of a Court of original jurisdiction, and namely a succession of the participants’ appearance in Court should be determined by a Court. At the same time a lawmaker determines such succession during the court proceedings of a Court of appeal which complies with a sequence of the participants’ and their representatives’ speeches during appeal proceedings.\\nThus, it is worth determining an imperative succession of the parties’ speeches in Court of original jurisdiction. It is also worth saying that the court debates provide execution of two main foundations of the commercial court proceedings, that is a principle of competitiveness of the parties and court decree validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actual problems of native jurisprudence\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actual problems of native jurisprudence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15421/391916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of native jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/391916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了商事法庭诉讼程序的创新,即法庭辩论。案件的参与人(原告、被告、他们的代表和第三方)在开庭结束时发表讲话。法院辩论是法院诉讼程序的最后阶段,在法院对案件作出裁决之前。法庭辩论包括法庭发言和当事人的答辩。这是普通法庭程序附带的创新。简易司法不实行法庭辩论。在法庭辩论中发言是当事人的一项权利,而不是义务。除此之外,不进行法庭辩论也不会导致法院以违反法律规则为由下令撤销案件。但研究机构也不应低估,因为只有法庭辩论才能使当事人根据案件的事实背景、前一阶段获得的证据和法律依据证明自己的立场。由于辩论是商事法庭诉讼制度的创新;要科学细致地研究它们,确定它们的意义、内容和构成要素。同时,研究过程也暴露出一些不足。因此,《乌克兰经济程序规则》并没有确定参与人在具有原始管辖权的法院出庭辩论的明显顺序,也就是说,参与人的出庭顺序应由法院决定。同时,立法者在上诉法院的诉讼程序中决定这种继承,这与上诉程序中参与人及其代表的发言顺序相符。因此,有必要确定当事人在原审管辖权法院的发言是否有必要继承。还值得一提的是,法庭辩论为商事法庭诉讼的执行提供了两个主要基础,即当事人的竞争性原则和法院判决的有效性原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COURT DEBATES AT COMMERCIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS
The article researches the innovations of commercial court proceedings, and namely the Court debates. The participants of a case (Plaintiff, Defendant, their representatives and the third parties) give speeches at the end of a Court session. The Court debates are the final stage of the court proceedings and precede a Court decree of a case. The court debates imply a court speech and the replies of the parties. This innovation incidental to general court proceedings. The court debates are not practiced while summary jurisdiction. A court speech during the debates is a right and not an obligation of the Parties. In addition to that, non-practicing the court debates will not lead to court decree repeal of a case based on infringement of the rules of law. But the research institute should not be underestimated, because only the court debates make it possible for the parties to prove their position based on the factual background of a case, the evidences gained at the prior stage and the legal foundation. Due to the fact that the debates are the innovation of the commercial court proceedings; they are to be scientifically researched in detail, their meaning, content and elements are to be determined. Simultaneously the research procedure reveals some shortcomings. Thus the Rules of the Economic Procedure of Ukraine do not determine a distinct succession of the participants’ appearance in Court debates of a Court of original jurisdiction, and namely a succession of the participants’ appearance in Court should be determined by a Court. At the same time a lawmaker determines such succession during the court proceedings of a Court of appeal which complies with a sequence of the participants’ and their representatives’ speeches during appeal proceedings. Thus, it is worth determining an imperative succession of the parties’ speeches in Court of original jurisdiction. It is also worth saying that the court debates provide execution of two main foundations of the commercial court proceedings, that is a principle of competitiveness of the parties and court decree validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信