雷达截面(RCS)估计高频技术的比较研究

H. Singh
{"title":"雷达截面(RCS)估计高频技术的比较研究","authors":"H. Singh","doi":"10.1109/DIPED.2004.242461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper studies and analyzes scattering by some of the shapes that are most used to model targets. From simple shapes, like cylinder and cone, to the conically capped cylinder, different techniques are used to analyze the scattering phenomena. Results obtained are compared over a wide range of frequencies and aspect angles. These techniques include geometrical theory of diffraction, individual scattering center method, and caustic correction method. Results are found to be in good agreement for most aspect angles. One can conclude that the RCS values obtained by the caustic correction and individual scattering center methods are closer as compared to GTD.","PeriodicalId":126782,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar/Workshop on Direct and Inverse Problems of Electromagnetic and Acoustic Wave Theory, 2004. DIPED 2004.","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of high frequency techniques in radar cross-section (RCS) estimation\",\"authors\":\"H. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DIPED.2004.242461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper studies and analyzes scattering by some of the shapes that are most used to model targets. From simple shapes, like cylinder and cone, to the conically capped cylinder, different techniques are used to analyze the scattering phenomena. Results obtained are compared over a wide range of frequencies and aspect angles. These techniques include geometrical theory of diffraction, individual scattering center method, and caustic correction method. Results are found to be in good agreement for most aspect angles. One can conclude that the RCS values obtained by the caustic correction and individual scattering center methods are closer as compared to GTD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar/Workshop on Direct and Inverse Problems of Electromagnetic and Acoustic Wave Theory, 2004. DIPED 2004.\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar/Workshop on Direct and Inverse Problems of Electromagnetic and Acoustic Wave Theory, 2004. DIPED 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DIPED.2004.242461\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar/Workshop on Direct and Inverse Problems of Electromagnetic and Acoustic Wave Theory, 2004. DIPED 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DIPED.2004.242461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究和分析了几种最常用的目标模型的散射形状。从简单的圆柱体和圆锥形到锥形圆柱,采用了不同的技术来分析散射现象。所得到的结果在很宽的频率和角度范围内进行比较。这些技术包括几何衍射理论、单个散射中心法和焦散校正法。结果发现在大多数方面的角度是很好的协议。可以得出结论,通过焦散校正和单个散射中心方法获得的RCS值比GTD更接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of high frequency techniques in radar cross-section (RCS) estimation
The paper studies and analyzes scattering by some of the shapes that are most used to model targets. From simple shapes, like cylinder and cone, to the conically capped cylinder, different techniques are used to analyze the scattering phenomena. Results obtained are compared over a wide range of frequencies and aspect angles. These techniques include geometrical theory of diffraction, individual scattering center method, and caustic correction method. Results are found to be in good agreement for most aspect angles. One can conclude that the RCS values obtained by the caustic correction and individual scattering center methods are closer as compared to GTD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信