HTLV-I/II血清学阳性且不确定的献血者中没有HTLV-I/II感染。

Microbiologica Pub Date : 1992-10-01
M C Re, G Furlini, E Ramazzotti, M Vignoli, G Zauli, S Lolli, P Monari, D Belletti, A Nanetti, M La Placa
{"title":"HTLV-I/II血清学阳性且不确定的献血者中没有HTLV-I/II感染。","authors":"M C Re,&nbsp;G Furlini,&nbsp;E Ramazzotti,&nbsp;M Vignoli,&nbsp;G Zauli,&nbsp;S Lolli,&nbsp;P Monari,&nbsp;D Belletti,&nbsp;A Nanetti,&nbsp;M La Placa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pathogenetic potential and the true extent of human T leukemia/lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) and type II (HTLV-II) infection are unknown. To find out more about HTLV-I/II seroepidemiology and the risks of iatrogenic transmission, we performed a serological study, screening 4086 healthy blood donors. A surprisingly high percentage of serum reactivity to HTLV-I/II antigens was observed by commercial ELISA (2.08%) and immunoblotting (IB) (0.85%) analysis, although none of the samples satisfied the (IB) criteria for positivity based on detection of gag protein p24 and at least one env gene product, either gp46 or gp61/68. To clarify these inconclusive results, we performed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for HTLV-I and HTLV-II provirus detection in peripheral blood lymphocytes, obtained from individuals with an apparent pattern of seropositivity. The data obtained by PCR failed to reveal evidence of HTLV-I/II provirus integration in peripheral blood cells, ruling out the possibility of a viral infection in these cases, and pinpointing the limitations of both serological methods used. Our observations suggest that serological assays alone are not a reliable tool for blood donor screening of HTLV-I/II infection and raise the important question of interpreting inconclusive results.</p>","PeriodicalId":77264,"journal":{"name":"Microbiologica","volume":"15 4","pages":"329-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absence of HTLV-I/II infection in blood donors with positive and inconclusive HTLV-I/II serology.\",\"authors\":\"M C Re,&nbsp;G Furlini,&nbsp;E Ramazzotti,&nbsp;M Vignoli,&nbsp;G Zauli,&nbsp;S Lolli,&nbsp;P Monari,&nbsp;D Belletti,&nbsp;A Nanetti,&nbsp;M La Placa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The pathogenetic potential and the true extent of human T leukemia/lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) and type II (HTLV-II) infection are unknown. To find out more about HTLV-I/II seroepidemiology and the risks of iatrogenic transmission, we performed a serological study, screening 4086 healthy blood donors. A surprisingly high percentage of serum reactivity to HTLV-I/II antigens was observed by commercial ELISA (2.08%) and immunoblotting (IB) (0.85%) analysis, although none of the samples satisfied the (IB) criteria for positivity based on detection of gag protein p24 and at least one env gene product, either gp46 or gp61/68. To clarify these inconclusive results, we performed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for HTLV-I and HTLV-II provirus detection in peripheral blood lymphocytes, obtained from individuals with an apparent pattern of seropositivity. The data obtained by PCR failed to reveal evidence of HTLV-I/II provirus integration in peripheral blood cells, ruling out the possibility of a viral infection in these cases, and pinpointing the limitations of both serological methods used. Our observations suggest that serological assays alone are not a reliable tool for blood donor screening of HTLV-I/II infection and raise the important question of interpreting inconclusive results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiologica\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"329-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类T白血病/嗜淋巴病毒I型(HTLV-I)和II型(HTLV-II)感染的致病潜力和真正程度尚不清楚。为了进一步了解HTLV-I/II的血清流行病学和医源性传播的风险,我们对4086名健康献血者进行了血清学研究。通过商业ELISA(2.08%)和免疫印迹(0.85%)分析,观察到HTLV-I/II抗原的血清反应性出奇地高,尽管基于gag蛋白p24和至少一种env基因产物gp46或gp61/68的检测,所有样品都不符合(IB)阳性标准。为了澄清这些不确定的结果,我们对HTLV-I和HTLV-II前病毒在外周血淋巴细胞中的检测进行了聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析,这些淋巴细胞来自具有明显血清阳性模式的个体。PCR获得的数据未能揭示HTLV-I/II病毒在外周血整合的证据,排除了这些病例中病毒感染的可能性,并指出了两种血清学方法的局限性。我们的观察结果表明,单独的血清学检测并不是筛查献血者HTLV-I/II感染的可靠工具,并提出了解释不确定结果的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Absence of HTLV-I/II infection in blood donors with positive and inconclusive HTLV-I/II serology.

The pathogenetic potential and the true extent of human T leukemia/lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) and type II (HTLV-II) infection are unknown. To find out more about HTLV-I/II seroepidemiology and the risks of iatrogenic transmission, we performed a serological study, screening 4086 healthy blood donors. A surprisingly high percentage of serum reactivity to HTLV-I/II antigens was observed by commercial ELISA (2.08%) and immunoblotting (IB) (0.85%) analysis, although none of the samples satisfied the (IB) criteria for positivity based on detection of gag protein p24 and at least one env gene product, either gp46 or gp61/68. To clarify these inconclusive results, we performed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis for HTLV-I and HTLV-II provirus detection in peripheral blood lymphocytes, obtained from individuals with an apparent pattern of seropositivity. The data obtained by PCR failed to reveal evidence of HTLV-I/II provirus integration in peripheral blood cells, ruling out the possibility of a viral infection in these cases, and pinpointing the limitations of both serological methods used. Our observations suggest that serological assays alone are not a reliable tool for blood donor screening of HTLV-I/II infection and raise the important question of interpreting inconclusive results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信