低功率整数乘法器的最佳布斯基数

H. Saleh, B. Mohammad, E. Swartzlander
{"title":"低功率整数乘法器的最佳布斯基数","authors":"H. Saleh, B. Mohammad, E. Swartzlander","doi":"10.1109/IDT.2013.6727119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the optimum Booth integer multiplier for low power applications. Booth radix-4, radix-8 and radix-16 were compared for area, speed and power using standard-cell ASIC design flow and 28nm CMOS technology. All of the investigated designs were implemented in RTL, fully verified and then synthesized using 28nm standard-cell libraries which have low leakage slow cells, regular leakage average-speed cells and high-leakage fast-speed cells. The area, speed and power were compared to determine the best choice for low power designs. Among the three investigated designs, the Booth radix-4 was the best choice, it had the lowest area, power and fastest execution speed among the 3-choices. It is worthy of note that radix-8 had lower leakage power and overall power among the three designs when implemented using LVT cells. So for power sensitive and high-speed applications radix-8 could be a better choice with overhead of about 18% area and 3% slower.","PeriodicalId":446826,"journal":{"name":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The optimum Booth radix for low power integer multipliers\",\"authors\":\"H. Saleh, B. Mohammad, E. Swartzlander\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IDT.2013.6727119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the optimum Booth integer multiplier for low power applications. Booth radix-4, radix-8 and radix-16 were compared for area, speed and power using standard-cell ASIC design flow and 28nm CMOS technology. All of the investigated designs were implemented in RTL, fully verified and then synthesized using 28nm standard-cell libraries which have low leakage slow cells, regular leakage average-speed cells and high-leakage fast-speed cells. The area, speed and power were compared to determine the best choice for low power designs. Among the three investigated designs, the Booth radix-4 was the best choice, it had the lowest area, power and fastest execution speed among the 3-choices. It is worthy of note that radix-8 had lower leakage power and overall power among the three designs when implemented using LVT cells. So for power sensitive and high-speed applications radix-8 could be a better choice with overhead of about 18% area and 3% slower.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2013.6727119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 8th IEEE Design and Test Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDT.2013.6727119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文研究了低功耗应用的最佳布斯整数乘法器。采用标准单元ASIC设计流程和28nm CMOS技术,对基数4、基数8和基数16的面积、速度和功耗进行了比较。所有设计都在RTL中实现,充分验证并使用28nm标准细胞库进行合成,该标准细胞库包括低泄漏慢速细胞,常规泄漏平均速度细胞和高泄漏快速细胞。对面积、速度和功率进行比较,以确定低功耗设计的最佳选择。在三个被调查的设计中,Booth基数-4是最佳选择,它在三个选择中具有最小的面积,功耗和最快的执行速度。值得注意的是,当使用LVT单元实现时,radix-8在三种设计中具有较低的泄漏功率和总功率。因此,对于功率敏感和高速应用程序,基数-8可能是更好的选择,开销约为18%的面积,速度慢3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The optimum Booth radix for low power integer multipliers
This paper investigates the optimum Booth integer multiplier for low power applications. Booth radix-4, radix-8 and radix-16 were compared for area, speed and power using standard-cell ASIC design flow and 28nm CMOS technology. All of the investigated designs were implemented in RTL, fully verified and then synthesized using 28nm standard-cell libraries which have low leakage slow cells, regular leakage average-speed cells and high-leakage fast-speed cells. The area, speed and power were compared to determine the best choice for low power designs. Among the three investigated designs, the Booth radix-4 was the best choice, it had the lowest area, power and fastest execution speed among the 3-choices. It is worthy of note that radix-8 had lower leakage power and overall power among the three designs when implemented using LVT cells. So for power sensitive and high-speed applications radix-8 could be a better choice with overhead of about 18% area and 3% slower.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信