{"title":"硅PiN与SiC肖特基二极管开关能量损耗的比较研究","authors":"N. Yahaya, K. C. Chew","doi":"10.1109/PECON.2004.1461646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"paper is to compare the switching energy losses of the silicon carbide Schottky diode with the silicon PiN diode. The comparison is done using an inductive load chopper circuit simulated with Pspice, a type of circuit analysis software. Both diode models used for the simulation are from Infineon; the silicon carbide Schottky (SDP04S60, 4 A/600 V) and silicon PiN (IDP06E60, 6 A/600 V).","PeriodicalId":375856,"journal":{"name":"PECon 2004. Proceedings. National Power and Energy Conference, 2004.","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of the switching energy losses between Si PiN and SiC Schottky diode\",\"authors\":\"N. Yahaya, K. C. Chew\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PECON.2004.1461646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"paper is to compare the switching energy losses of the silicon carbide Schottky diode with the silicon PiN diode. The comparison is done using an inductive load chopper circuit simulated with Pspice, a type of circuit analysis software. Both diode models used for the simulation are from Infineon; the silicon carbide Schottky (SDP04S60, 4 A/600 V) and silicon PiN (IDP06E60, 6 A/600 V).\",\"PeriodicalId\":375856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PECon 2004. Proceedings. National Power and Energy Conference, 2004.\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PECon 2004. Proceedings. National Power and Energy Conference, 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PECON.2004.1461646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PECon 2004. Proceedings. National Power and Energy Conference, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PECON.2004.1461646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative study of the switching energy losses between Si PiN and SiC Schottky diode
paper is to compare the switching energy losses of the silicon carbide Schottky diode with the silicon PiN diode. The comparison is done using an inductive load chopper circuit simulated with Pspice, a type of circuit analysis software. Both diode models used for the simulation are from Infineon; the silicon carbide Schottky (SDP04S60, 4 A/600 V) and silicon PiN (IDP06E60, 6 A/600 V).