“未知当事人”

M. Hasian, Nicholas S. Paliewicz
{"title":"“未知当事人”","authors":"M. Hasian, Nicholas S. Paliewicz","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1fkgc9s.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explains the myriad reasons why so many members of the NAACP\nand other anti-lynching communities failed to muster enough support to pass U.S. federal anti-lynching legislation before World War II. During this period, all sorts of “states’ rights” arguments were used to critique the efforts of organizations like the NAACP and the International Labor Defense (ILD) during the Jim Crow years.","PeriodicalId":259968,"journal":{"name":"Racial Terrorism","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“By Parties Unknown”\",\"authors\":\"M. Hasian, Nicholas S. Paliewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1fkgc9s.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explains the myriad reasons why so many members of the NAACP\\nand other anti-lynching communities failed to muster enough support to pass U.S. federal anti-lynching legislation before World War II. During this period, all sorts of “states’ rights” arguments were used to critique the efforts of organizations like the NAACP and the International Labor Defense (ILD) during the Jim Crow years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Racial Terrorism\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Racial Terrorism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1fkgc9s.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Racial Terrorism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1fkgc9s.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章解释了为什么许多naacp和其他反私刑团体的成员在第二次世界大战之前未能获得足够的支持来通过美国联邦反私刑立法的无数原因。在此期间,各种各样的“国家权利”的论点被用来批评组织,如全国有色人种协进会和国际劳工保护组织(ILD)在吉姆克劳年代的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“By Parties Unknown”
This chapter explains the myriad reasons why so many members of the NAACP and other anti-lynching communities failed to muster enough support to pass U.S. federal anti-lynching legislation before World War II. During this period, all sorts of “states’ rights” arguments were used to critique the efforts of organizations like the NAACP and the International Labor Defense (ILD) during the Jim Crow years.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信