在化学工程导论课程中积极合作学习

D. Dibiasio, J. Groccia
{"title":"在化学工程导论课程中积极合作学习","authors":"D. Dibiasio, J. Groccia","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1995.483141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A sophomore level chemical engineering course was redesigned to emphasize active and cooperative learning. The structure used was a peer-assisted cooperative learning model developed at WPI. The experimental course was compared to a control course taught by the passive lecture method. The control and test courses were compared using student performance, attitudes, evaluations of the course and instructor and faculty time. We found that student performance was better and content coverage was increased in the test class. Faculty time was reduced by 24% using the peer assisted cooperative learning model. Composite student evaluations of the course and instructor increased slightly from the control to the test course. Student attitudes about the profession increased during the test course, but were mixed regarding working in teams.","PeriodicalId":137465,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active and cooperative learning in an introductory chemical engineering course\",\"authors\":\"D. Dibiasio, J. Groccia\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.1995.483141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A sophomore level chemical engineering course was redesigned to emphasize active and cooperative learning. The structure used was a peer-assisted cooperative learning model developed at WPI. The experimental course was compared to a control course taught by the passive lecture method. The control and test courses were compared using student performance, attitudes, evaluations of the course and instructor and faculty time. We found that student performance was better and content coverage was increased in the test class. Faculty time was reduced by 24% using the peer assisted cooperative learning model. Composite student evaluations of the course and instructor increased slightly from the control to the test course. Student attitudes about the profession increased during the test course, but were mixed regarding working in teams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1995.483141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1995.483141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

对二年级的化学工程课程进行了重新设计,强调主动合作学习。使用的结构是WPI开发的同伴辅助合作学习模式。将实验课与被动授课法的对照课进行比较。对照和测试课程采用学生成绩、态度、课程评价、教师和教师时间进行比较。我们发现,学生的表现更好了,在测试班的内容覆盖率增加了。使用同伴辅助合作学习模式,教师时间减少了24%。从对照课程到测试课程,学生对课程和讲师的综合评价略有增加。在测试课程中,学生对这一职业的态度有所提高,但在团队合作方面,他们的态度不一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Active and cooperative learning in an introductory chemical engineering course
A sophomore level chemical engineering course was redesigned to emphasize active and cooperative learning. The structure used was a peer-assisted cooperative learning model developed at WPI. The experimental course was compared to a control course taught by the passive lecture method. The control and test courses were compared using student performance, attitudes, evaluations of the course and instructor and faculty time. We found that student performance was better and content coverage was increased in the test class. Faculty time was reduced by 24% using the peer assisted cooperative learning model. Composite student evaluations of the course and instructor increased slightly from the control to the test course. Student attitudes about the profession increased during the test course, but were mixed regarding working in teams.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信