先例的必然性

A. Pin
{"title":"先例的必然性","authors":"A. Pin","doi":"10.1163/27725650-02020002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDrawing mainly from the common law tradition, the article identifies the notion and the normative value of precedent, summarizes its historical development, and distinguishes between its application in the fields of case law, constitutional law, and statutory legislation. It then ponders the pros and cons of precedent-based adjudication and the institutional and ethical requisites for its application. It finally considers the recent phenomena of arbitration courts and para-judicial institutions that patrol the web, which seem to resist the logic and ramifications of precedent-bound adjudication.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The (In)evitability of Precedent\",\"authors\":\"A. Pin\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/27725650-02020002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nDrawing mainly from the common law tradition, the article identifies the notion and the normative value of precedent, summarizes its historical development, and distinguishes between its application in the fields of case law, constitutional law, and statutory legislation. It then ponders the pros and cons of precedent-based adjudication and the institutional and ethical requisites for its application. It finally considers the recent phenomena of arbitration courts and para-judicial institutions that patrol the web, which seem to resist the logic and ramifications of precedent-bound adjudication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-02020002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-02020002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要从英美法系的传统出发,对判例的概念和规范价值进行了界定,总结了判例的历史发展,并对判例在判例法、宪法法和成文法领域的应用进行了区分。然后,它思考了基于先例的裁决的利弊,以及其应用的制度和道德要求。最后,它考虑了最近的仲裁法院和在网络上巡逻的准司法机构的现象,这些现象似乎抵制了先例约束裁决的逻辑和后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The (In)evitability of Precedent
Drawing mainly from the common law tradition, the article identifies the notion and the normative value of precedent, summarizes its historical development, and distinguishes between its application in the fields of case law, constitutional law, and statutory legislation. It then ponders the pros and cons of precedent-based adjudication and the institutional and ethical requisites for its application. It finally considers the recent phenomena of arbitration courts and para-judicial institutions that patrol the web, which seem to resist the logic and ramifications of precedent-bound adjudication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信