对自动化行政活动的司法控制

R. A. Muñoz
{"title":"对自动化行政活动的司法控制","authors":"R. A. Muñoz","doi":"10.18316/redes.v10i2.10279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a context of health crisis -still in forcewhere organizations had to exponentially accelerate their digital transformation processes and public administrations, in particular, had to move towards paths traced in the opening of data as consequence of government designs and processes focused on information -which even led to the use of Artifi cial Intelligence techniques for the public sector-, this paper seeks to answer the basic question regarding what should be judicially controlled in the case of automated administrative decision-making activity? Or, with other words, what principles must the Public Administration respect, verifi ed by the Judiciary, when it uses intelligent tools to carry out its functions? Th us, the work off ers -in general termsa series of evaluative tools that the magistrate must have in view to validate, or in his case, invalidate a decision-making action of this type.","PeriodicalId":375649,"journal":{"name":"Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El control judicial de la actividad administrativa automatizada\",\"authors\":\"R. A. Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.18316/redes.v10i2.10279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a context of health crisis -still in forcewhere organizations had to exponentially accelerate their digital transformation processes and public administrations, in particular, had to move towards paths traced in the opening of data as consequence of government designs and processes focused on information -which even led to the use of Artifi cial Intelligence techniques for the public sector-, this paper seeks to answer the basic question regarding what should be judicially controlled in the case of automated administrative decision-making activity? Or, with other words, what principles must the Public Administration respect, verifi ed by the Judiciary, when it uses intelligent tools to carry out its functions? Th us, the work off ers -in general termsa series of evaluative tools that the magistrate must have in view to validate, or in his case, invalidate a decision-making action of this type.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18316/redes.v10i2.10279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Eletrônica Direito e Sociedade - REDES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18316/redes.v10i2.10279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在健康危机的背景下————仍然存在————各组织不得不以指数方式加速其数字化转型进程,特别是公共行政部门,由于政府的设计和以信息为重点的流程,不得不朝着开放数据的道路前进————这甚至导致公共部门使用人工智能技术————本文试图回答一个基本问题,即在自动行政决策活动的情况下,司法应该控制什么?或者,换句话说,公共行政部门在使用智能工具执行其职能时,必须遵守哪些经司法机构核实的原则?因此,一般来说,这项工作是指一系列的评估工具,裁判官必须考虑到这些工具来验证,或者在他的情况下,使这种类型的决策行动无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El control judicial de la actividad administrativa automatizada
In a context of health crisis -still in forcewhere organizations had to exponentially accelerate their digital transformation processes and public administrations, in particular, had to move towards paths traced in the opening of data as consequence of government designs and processes focused on information -which even led to the use of Artifi cial Intelligence techniques for the public sector-, this paper seeks to answer the basic question regarding what should be judicially controlled in the case of automated administrative decision-making activity? Or, with other words, what principles must the Public Administration respect, verifi ed by the Judiciary, when it uses intelligent tools to carry out its functions? Th us, the work off ers -in general termsa series of evaluative tools that the magistrate must have in view to validate, or in his case, invalidate a decision-making action of this type.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信