COVID-19大流行期间投资者的内心:来自StockTwits数据的证据

Hasan Fallahgoul
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间投资者的内心:来自StockTwits数据的证据","authors":"Hasan Fallahgoul","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3583462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors study investor beliefs—sentiment and disagreement—about stock market returns during the COVID-19 pandemic using a large number of investor messages, about 3.7 million, on a social media investing platform, StockTwits. The rich and multimodal features of StockTwits data allow the authors to explore the evolution of sentiment and disagreement within and across investors, sectors, and even industries. The authors find that sentiment (disagreement) has a sharp decrease (increase) across all investors with any investment philosophy, horizon, and experience between February 19, 2020, and March 23, 2020, when a historical market high was followed by a record drop. Surprisingly, these measures have a sharp reversal toward the end of March. However, the performance of these measures across various sectors is heterogeneous. Financial and healthcare sectors are the most pessimistic and optimistic divisions, respectively. TOPICS: Security analysis and valuation, quantitative methods, big data/machine learning, financial crises and financial market history, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ Daily time series of the sentiment and disagreement is not a stationary process. ▪ Sentiment (disagreement) has a sharp decrease (increase) across all investors with any investment philosophy, horizon, and experience between February 19, 2020, and March 23, 2020, when a historical market high was followed by a record drop. ▪ The financial and healthcare sectors are the most pessimistic and optimistic divisions, respectively.","PeriodicalId":199045,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inside the Mind of Investors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the StockTwits Data\",\"authors\":\"Hasan Fallahgoul\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3583462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors study investor beliefs—sentiment and disagreement—about stock market returns during the COVID-19 pandemic using a large number of investor messages, about 3.7 million, on a social media investing platform, StockTwits. The rich and multimodal features of StockTwits data allow the authors to explore the evolution of sentiment and disagreement within and across investors, sectors, and even industries. The authors find that sentiment (disagreement) has a sharp decrease (increase) across all investors with any investment philosophy, horizon, and experience between February 19, 2020, and March 23, 2020, when a historical market high was followed by a record drop. Surprisingly, these measures have a sharp reversal toward the end of March. However, the performance of these measures across various sectors is heterogeneous. Financial and healthcare sectors are the most pessimistic and optimistic divisions, respectively. TOPICS: Security analysis and valuation, quantitative methods, big data/machine learning, financial crises and financial market history, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ Daily time series of the sentiment and disagreement is not a stationary process. ▪ Sentiment (disagreement) has a sharp decrease (increase) across all investors with any investment philosophy, horizon, and experience between February 19, 2020, and March 23, 2020, when a historical market high was followed by a record drop. ▪ The financial and healthcare sectors are the most pessimistic and optimistic divisions, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3583462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3583462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

作者利用社交媒体投资平台StockTwits上的大量投资者信息(约370万条),研究了投资者在COVID-19大流行期间对股市回报的看法——情绪和分歧。StockTwits数据的丰富和多模式特征使作者能够探索投资者、部门甚至行业内部和行业之间的情绪和分歧的演变。作者发现,在2020年2月19日至2020年3月23日期间,所有具有任何投资理念、视野和经验的投资者的情绪(分歧)都急剧下降(上升),当时市场达到历史高点,随后出现创纪录的下跌。令人惊讶的是,这些指标在接近3月底时出现了急剧逆转。然而,这些措施在不同部门的表现是不同的。金融和医疗行业分别是最悲观和最乐观的行业。主题:证券分析和估值,定量方法,大数据/机器学习,金融危机和金融市场历史,绩效衡量。主要发现▪情绪和分歧的每日时间序列不是一个平稳的过程。•在2020年2月19日至2020年3月23日期间,所有具有任何投资理念、视野和经验的投资者的情绪(分歧)急剧下降(上升),当时市场达到历史高点,随后出现创纪录的下跌。▪金融和保健部门分别是最悲观和最乐观的部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inside the Mind of Investors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the StockTwits Data
The authors study investor beliefs—sentiment and disagreement—about stock market returns during the COVID-19 pandemic using a large number of investor messages, about 3.7 million, on a social media investing platform, StockTwits. The rich and multimodal features of StockTwits data allow the authors to explore the evolution of sentiment and disagreement within and across investors, sectors, and even industries. The authors find that sentiment (disagreement) has a sharp decrease (increase) across all investors with any investment philosophy, horizon, and experience between February 19, 2020, and March 23, 2020, when a historical market high was followed by a record drop. Surprisingly, these measures have a sharp reversal toward the end of March. However, the performance of these measures across various sectors is heterogeneous. Financial and healthcare sectors are the most pessimistic and optimistic divisions, respectively. TOPICS: Security analysis and valuation, quantitative methods, big data/machine learning, financial crises and financial market history, performance measurement Key Findings ▪ Daily time series of the sentiment and disagreement is not a stationary process. ▪ Sentiment (disagreement) has a sharp decrease (increase) across all investors with any investment philosophy, horizon, and experience between February 19, 2020, and March 23, 2020, when a historical market high was followed by a record drop. ▪ The financial and healthcare sectors are the most pessimistic and optimistic divisions, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信