{"title":"自我意识是自我的意识吗?","authors":"Jean-Philippe Narboux","doi":"10.4324/9781315626307-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The title of this essay calls into question an equivalence that has been generally taken for granted ever since its terms became available with the advent of modern philosophy. The assumed equivalence holds between self-consciousness, on the one hand, and consciousness of one’s self, on the other hand, where one’s self is by definition that in virtue of which one enjoys self-consciousness. It is built in modern philosophy of mind. I shall call it the Canonical Equivalence (hereafter CE). Let us have it before our eyes:","PeriodicalId":286095,"journal":{"name":"Wittgenstein and Phenomenology","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Self-Consciousness Consciousness of One’s Self?\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Philippe Narboux\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315626307-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The title of this essay calls into question an equivalence that has been generally taken for granted ever since its terms became available with the advent of modern philosophy. The assumed equivalence holds between self-consciousness, on the one hand, and consciousness of one’s self, on the other hand, where one’s self is by definition that in virtue of which one enjoys self-consciousness. It is built in modern philosophy of mind. I shall call it the Canonical Equivalence (hereafter CE). Let us have it before our eyes:\",\"PeriodicalId\":286095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wittgenstein and Phenomenology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wittgenstein and Phenomenology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315626307-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wittgenstein and Phenomenology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315626307-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is Self-Consciousness Consciousness of One’s Self?
The title of this essay calls into question an equivalence that has been generally taken for granted ever since its terms became available with the advent of modern philosophy. The assumed equivalence holds between self-consciousness, on the one hand, and consciousness of one’s self, on the other hand, where one’s self is by definition that in virtue of which one enjoys self-consciousness. It is built in modern philosophy of mind. I shall call it the Canonical Equivalence (hereafter CE). Let us have it before our eyes:
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
