{"title":"互操作信任协商策略研究","authors":"Sabrina Baselice, P. Bonatti, M. Faella","doi":"10.1109/POLICY.2007.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the many works on trust negotiation, only a few deal with negotiation strategies. These works are tailored to specific frameworks-so their results cannot be extended to competing approaches - and introduce assumptions that cannot be always guaranteed. In this paper we identify some guidelines for designing \"good\" (interoperable) trust negotiation strategies under a different set of assumptions, namely, a peer's interest in making transactions succeed. Moreover, since our analysis is based on an abstract framework, the guidelines apply to a wide range of policy languages and negotiation frameworks.","PeriodicalId":240693,"journal":{"name":"Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'07)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Interoperable Trust Negotiation Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Baselice, P. Bonatti, M. Faella\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/POLICY.2007.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the many works on trust negotiation, only a few deal with negotiation strategies. These works are tailored to specific frameworks-so their results cannot be extended to competing approaches - and introduce assumptions that cannot be always guaranteed. In this paper we identify some guidelines for designing \\\"good\\\" (interoperable) trust negotiation strategies under a different set of assumptions, namely, a peer's interest in making transactions succeed. Moreover, since our analysis is based on an abstract framework, the guidelines apply to a wide range of policy languages and negotiation frameworks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'07)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'07)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/POLICY.2007.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/POLICY.2007.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Among the many works on trust negotiation, only a few deal with negotiation strategies. These works are tailored to specific frameworks-so their results cannot be extended to competing approaches - and introduce assumptions that cannot be always guaranteed. In this paper we identify some guidelines for designing "good" (interoperable) trust negotiation strategies under a different set of assumptions, namely, a peer's interest in making transactions succeed. Moreover, since our analysis is based on an abstract framework, the guidelines apply to a wide range of policy languages and negotiation frameworks.