体育仲裁的管辖权、可仲裁性和法律地位:若干问题

D. Mavromati
{"title":"体育仲裁的管辖权、可仲裁性和法律地位:若干问题","authors":"D. Mavromati","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2573622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The distinction between what constitutes a jurisdictional issue and what relates to the merits of the case is not always an easy task for CAS Panels, where a lot of ‘hybrid’ situations arise and there is no categorical answer to these questions, not least because of the particularities of the appeal arbitration procedure. The paper describes the different terms related to jurisdiction, arbitrability and legal standing and examines in particular some issues arising out of the jurisdiction ratione materiae.","PeriodicalId":313622,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jurisdiction, Arbitrability and Legal Standing in Sports Arbitration: Selected Issues\",\"authors\":\"D. Mavromati\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2573622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The distinction between what constitutes a jurisdictional issue and what relates to the merits of the case is not always an easy task for CAS Panels, where a lot of ‘hybrid’ situations arise and there is no categorical answer to these questions, not least because of the particularities of the appeal arbitration procedure. The paper describes the different terms related to jurisdiction, arbitrability and legal standing and examines in particular some issues arising out of the jurisdiction ratione materiae.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2573622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2573622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于仲裁院专家组来说,区分什么构成管辖权问题,什么与案件的案情有关,并不总是一件容易的事,因为出现了许多“混合”情况,而且这些问题没有明确的答案,尤其是由于上诉仲裁程序的特殊性。本文描述了与管辖权、可仲裁性和法律地位有关的不同术语,并特别审查了因属事管辖权而产生的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jurisdiction, Arbitrability and Legal Standing in Sports Arbitration: Selected Issues
The distinction between what constitutes a jurisdictional issue and what relates to the merits of the case is not always an easy task for CAS Panels, where a lot of ‘hybrid’ situations arise and there is no categorical answer to these questions, not least because of the particularities of the appeal arbitration procedure. The paper describes the different terms related to jurisdiction, arbitrability and legal standing and examines in particular some issues arising out of the jurisdiction ratione materiae.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信