想象印度贸易和投资协定中的空间

J. Nedumpara
{"title":"想象印度贸易和投资协定中的空间","authors":"J. Nedumpara","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2532582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indian economy has opened up significantly in the last two decades, especially since the initiation of the economic reforms in 1991. Domestic opposition within India to its joining international economies treaties such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) resulted in India aggressively pushing for various flexibilities in areas such as public health and access to drugs, local content measures, environmental standards and trade remedies. In recent times, India has signed comprehensive economic partnership agreements with developed economies such as Japan, South Korea and Singapore and is negotiating a trade and investment agreement with the EU and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).This paper provides an analysis of the focus and coverage of issues under various trade and investment agreements and areas where India has negotiated development space or policy autonomy. In addition, the paper discusses the recent claims made against India under various Bilateral Investment Promotion Agreements (BIPA) and the safeguards adopted by India while negotiating such new agreements or renegotiating or reviewing existing agreements. Based on this approach this paper seeks to contribute to the project that attempts to compare and contrast the multiple strategies adopted by Southern countries in regulating trade and investment.","PeriodicalId":331576,"journal":{"name":"FGV DIREITO SP Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imagining Space in India's Trade and Investment Agreements\",\"authors\":\"J. Nedumpara\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2532582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Indian economy has opened up significantly in the last two decades, especially since the initiation of the economic reforms in 1991. Domestic opposition within India to its joining international economies treaties such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) resulted in India aggressively pushing for various flexibilities in areas such as public health and access to drugs, local content measures, environmental standards and trade remedies. In recent times, India has signed comprehensive economic partnership agreements with developed economies such as Japan, South Korea and Singapore and is negotiating a trade and investment agreement with the EU and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).This paper provides an analysis of the focus and coverage of issues under various trade and investment agreements and areas where India has negotiated development space or policy autonomy. In addition, the paper discusses the recent claims made against India under various Bilateral Investment Promotion Agreements (BIPA) and the safeguards adopted by India while negotiating such new agreements or renegotiating or reviewing existing agreements. Based on this approach this paper seeks to contribute to the project that attempts to compare and contrast the multiple strategies adopted by Southern countries in regulating trade and investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FGV DIREITO SP Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FGV DIREITO SP Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2532582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FGV DIREITO SP Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2532582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的二十年里,特别是自1991年开始经济改革以来,印度经济已经显著开放。由于印度国内反对加入世界贸易组织(WTO)等国际经济条约,印度积极推动在公共卫生和药品获取、当地含量措施、环境标准和贸易救济等领域采取各种灵活性。近年来,印度与日本、韩国和新加坡等发达经济体签署了全面经济伙伴关系协定,并正在与欧盟和区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(RCEP)谈判贸易和投资协定。本文分析了各种贸易和投资协定以及印度谈判发展空间或政策自主的领域下问题的焦点和覆盖范围。此外,本文还讨论了最近根据各种双边投资促进协定(BIPA)对印度提出的索赔,以及印度在谈判此类新协定或重新谈判或审查现有协定时采取的保障措施。基于这一方法,本文试图为一个项目作出贡献,该项目试图比较和对比南方国家在管理贸易和投资方面采取的多种战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imagining Space in India's Trade and Investment Agreements
Indian economy has opened up significantly in the last two decades, especially since the initiation of the economic reforms in 1991. Domestic opposition within India to its joining international economies treaties such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) resulted in India aggressively pushing for various flexibilities in areas such as public health and access to drugs, local content measures, environmental standards and trade remedies. In recent times, India has signed comprehensive economic partnership agreements with developed economies such as Japan, South Korea and Singapore and is negotiating a trade and investment agreement with the EU and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).This paper provides an analysis of the focus and coverage of issues under various trade and investment agreements and areas where India has negotiated development space or policy autonomy. In addition, the paper discusses the recent claims made against India under various Bilateral Investment Promotion Agreements (BIPA) and the safeguards adopted by India while negotiating such new agreements or renegotiating or reviewing existing agreements. Based on this approach this paper seeks to contribute to the project that attempts to compare and contrast the multiple strategies adopted by Southern countries in regulating trade and investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信