利用卫星测高数据对降雨径流模型进行基于水位的校准

J. Jian, D. Ryu, Q. J. Wang, H. Lee
{"title":"利用卫星测高数据对降雨径流模型进行基于水位的校准","authors":"J. Jian, D. Ryu, Q. J. Wang, H. Lee","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.jian531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of calibrating rainfall-runoff models using continuous measurements of water level in rivers. The water-level based calibration, that implements an inversed rating curve function in conventional rainfall-runoff models and incorporates a small number of regionalized discharge indices in the calibration (hereafter referred to as IRC_reg method), has important implications for extending rainfall-runoff modelling to basins with no discharge observations. However, the method is applicable only to basins equipped with water level sensors if we rely on ground-based observations. In this work, we demonstrate the efficacy of using remotely sensed water level data collected by an altimetry satellite, Jason 2, to calibrate a rainfall-runoff model. The altimeter-based calibration is applied to five study catchments in Australia, resulting in Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values of 0.31-0.66 (excluding one outlier), which are comparable with NSE values of 0.66-0.87 (daily observations) and 0.22-0.62 (10-day observations) for ground-based calibration. The altimetry-satellite-based calibration performance is highly correlated with river width. Previous studies recommended that the cross-sections of rivers along the satellite tracks should be wider than 350 meters to enable Jason 2 to estimate accurate water levels (Dumont et al., 2009; Markert et al., 2019). However, all rivers in this study are narrow rivers with widths ranging from 7 meters to 85 meters, which influence the accuracy of altimetry-based water level measurements and the subsequent calibration performances. Also, the 10-day temporal frequency of the Jason 2 is expected to affect the calibration performance.","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A water-level based calibration of rainfall-runoff models using satellite altimetry data\",\"authors\":\"J. Jian, D. Ryu, Q. J. Wang, H. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.36334/modsim.2023.jian531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of calibrating rainfall-runoff models using continuous measurements of water level in rivers. The water-level based calibration, that implements an inversed rating curve function in conventional rainfall-runoff models and incorporates a small number of regionalized discharge indices in the calibration (hereafter referred to as IRC_reg method), has important implications for extending rainfall-runoff modelling to basins with no discharge observations. However, the method is applicable only to basins equipped with water level sensors if we rely on ground-based observations. In this work, we demonstrate the efficacy of using remotely sensed water level data collected by an altimetry satellite, Jason 2, to calibrate a rainfall-runoff model. The altimeter-based calibration is applied to five study catchments in Australia, resulting in Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values of 0.31-0.66 (excluding one outlier), which are comparable with NSE values of 0.66-0.87 (daily observations) and 0.22-0.62 (10-day observations) for ground-based calibration. The altimetry-satellite-based calibration performance is highly correlated with river width. Previous studies recommended that the cross-sections of rivers along the satellite tracks should be wider than 350 meters to enable Jason 2 to estimate accurate water levels (Dumont et al., 2009; Markert et al., 2019). However, all rivers in this study are narrow rivers with widths ranging from 7 meters to 85 meters, which influence the accuracy of altimetry-based water level measurements and the subsequent calibration performances. Also, the 10-day temporal frequency of the Jason 2 is expected to affect the calibration performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.jian531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.jian531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的研究证明了使用连续测量河流水位来校准降雨径流模型的有效性。基于水位的定标方法(以下简称IRC_reg方法)实现了传统降雨径流模型的反向评级曲线函数,并在定标中纳入了少量区域化的流量指数,对于将降雨径流模型推广到无流量观测的流域具有重要意义。然而,如果我们依靠地面观测,该方法仅适用于配备了水位传感器的流域。在这项工作中,我们证明了使用由高空卫星Jason 2收集的遥感水位数据来校准降雨径流模型的有效性。基于高度计的校准应用于澳大利亚的五个研究集水区,得到的Nash Sutcliffe效率(NSE)值为0.31-0.66(不包括一个异常值),与地面校准的NSE值0.66-0.87(每日观测)和0.22-0.62(10天观测)相当。基于卫星测高的定标性能与河流宽度高度相关。先前的研究建议,沿卫星轨道的河流断面宽度应大于350米,以使Jason 2能够准确估计水位(Dumont et al., 2009;Markert et al., 2019)。然而,本研究中所有河流都是狭窄的河流,宽度在7米到85米之间,这影响了基于高程的水位测量的精度和随后的校准性能。此外,Jason 2的10天时间频率预计会影响校准性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A water-level based calibration of rainfall-runoff models using satellite altimetry data
: Recent studies demonstrated the efficacy of calibrating rainfall-runoff models using continuous measurements of water level in rivers. The water-level based calibration, that implements an inversed rating curve function in conventional rainfall-runoff models and incorporates a small number of regionalized discharge indices in the calibration (hereafter referred to as IRC_reg method), has important implications for extending rainfall-runoff modelling to basins with no discharge observations. However, the method is applicable only to basins equipped with water level sensors if we rely on ground-based observations. In this work, we demonstrate the efficacy of using remotely sensed water level data collected by an altimetry satellite, Jason 2, to calibrate a rainfall-runoff model. The altimeter-based calibration is applied to five study catchments in Australia, resulting in Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values of 0.31-0.66 (excluding one outlier), which are comparable with NSE values of 0.66-0.87 (daily observations) and 0.22-0.62 (10-day observations) for ground-based calibration. The altimetry-satellite-based calibration performance is highly correlated with river width. Previous studies recommended that the cross-sections of rivers along the satellite tracks should be wider than 350 meters to enable Jason 2 to estimate accurate water levels (Dumont et al., 2009; Markert et al., 2019). However, all rivers in this study are narrow rivers with widths ranging from 7 meters to 85 meters, which influence the accuracy of altimetry-based water level measurements and the subsequent calibration performances. Also, the 10-day temporal frequency of the Jason 2 is expected to affect the calibration performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信