高效工作流调度的任务排序与分配启发式方法

Kuo-Chan Huang, Meng-Han Tsai
{"title":"高效工作流调度的任务排序与分配启发式方法","authors":"Kuo-Chan Huang, Meng-Han Tsai","doi":"10.1109/ICS.2016.0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Task ranking and allocation are two major steps in list-based workflow scheduling. This paper explores various possibilities, evaluates recent approaches in the literature, and proposes several new task ranking and allocation heuristics. A series of simulation experiments have been conducted to evaluate the proposed heuristics. Experimental results indicate that effectiveness of task ranking and allocation heuristics largely depends on the characteristics of workflows to be scheduled, and our new scheduling heuristics can outperform previous methods when dealing with workflows of high CCR (Communication-to-Computation Ratio) values.","PeriodicalId":281088,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Computer Symposium (ICS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Task Ranking and Allocation Heuristics for Efficient Workflow Schedules\",\"authors\":\"Kuo-Chan Huang, Meng-Han Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICS.2016.0108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Task ranking and allocation are two major steps in list-based workflow scheduling. This paper explores various possibilities, evaluates recent approaches in the literature, and proposes several new task ranking and allocation heuristics. A series of simulation experiments have been conducted to evaluate the proposed heuristics. Experimental results indicate that effectiveness of task ranking and allocation heuristics largely depends on the characteristics of workflows to be scheduled, and our new scheduling heuristics can outperform previous methods when dealing with workflows of high CCR (Communication-to-Computation Ratio) values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Computer Symposium (ICS)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Computer Symposium (ICS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICS.2016.0108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Computer Symposium (ICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICS.2016.0108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

任务排序和分配是基于列表的工作流调度的两个主要步骤。本文探讨了各种可能性,评估了文献中的最新方法,并提出了几种新的任务排序和分配启发式方法。我们进行了一系列的仿真实验来评估所提出的启发式算法。实验结果表明,任务排序和分配启发式算法的有效性在很大程度上取决于待调度工作流的特征,在处理高通信计算比的工作流时,我们的新调度启发式算法优于以往的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Task Ranking and Allocation Heuristics for Efficient Workflow Schedules
Task ranking and allocation are two major steps in list-based workflow scheduling. This paper explores various possibilities, evaluates recent approaches in the literature, and proposes several new task ranking and allocation heuristics. A series of simulation experiments have been conducted to evaluate the proposed heuristics. Experimental results indicate that effectiveness of task ranking and allocation heuristics largely depends on the characteristics of workflows to be scheduled, and our new scheduling heuristics can outperform previous methods when dealing with workflows of high CCR (Communication-to-Computation Ratio) values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信