发布还是禁止?私人化石出版的伦理问题

Geological Curator Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.55468/gc311
P. Barrett
{"title":"发布还是禁止?私人化石出版的伦理问题","authors":"P. Barrett","doi":"10.55468/gc311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fossils are a limited resource and the information they provide is critical for unraveling evolutionary history. Private collections sometimes contain fossils that can provide unique scientific insights, but vary in the levels of access that they provide to researchers. Some palaeontologists have advocated publishing on specimens in private collections to unlock critical data, but these observations cannot be verified independently unless future access is guaranteed. Technological approaches, such as CT-scanning, might provide some solutions to this apparent conflict, but do not solve all of these issues. As a core scientific principle, reproducibility should be the key criterion applied when making decisions over whether to publish on a specimen or not.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Publish or prohibit? The ethics of publishing on privately owned fossils\",\"authors\":\"P. Barrett\",\"doi\":\"10.55468/gc311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fossils are a limited resource and the information they provide is critical for unraveling evolutionary history. Private collections sometimes contain fossils that can provide unique scientific insights, but vary in the levels of access that they provide to researchers. Some palaeontologists have advocated publishing on specimens in private collections to unlock critical data, but these observations cannot be verified independently unless future access is guaranteed. Technological approaches, such as CT-scanning, might provide some solutions to this apparent conflict, but do not solve all of these issues. As a core scientific principle, reproducibility should be the key criterion applied when making decisions over whether to publish on a specimen or not.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geological Curator\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geological Curator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Curator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

化石是一种有限的资源,它们提供的信息对于揭示进化史至关重要。私人收藏有时包含可以提供独特科学见解的化石,但它们提供给研究人员的访问程度各不相同。一些古生物学家主张发表私人收藏的标本,以解锁关键数据,但除非保证将来可以访问,否则这些观察结果无法独立验证。诸如ct扫描之类的技术方法可能会为这种明显的冲突提供一些解决方案,但并不能解决所有这些问题。作为一项核心科学原则,可重复性应该是决定是否发表标本的关键标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Publish or prohibit? The ethics of publishing on privately owned fossils
Fossils are a limited resource and the information they provide is critical for unraveling evolutionary history. Private collections sometimes contain fossils that can provide unique scientific insights, but vary in the levels of access that they provide to researchers. Some palaeontologists have advocated publishing on specimens in private collections to unlock critical data, but these observations cannot be verified independently unless future access is guaranteed. Technological approaches, such as CT-scanning, might provide some solutions to this apparent conflict, but do not solve all of these issues. As a core scientific principle, reproducibility should be the key criterion applied when making decisions over whether to publish on a specimen or not.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信