依恋与自我理解:以大脑为中心的育儿

D. Siegel
{"title":"依恋与自我理解:以大脑为中心的育儿","authors":"D. Siegel","doi":"10.4324/9780429472039-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: This article is an adaptation of a chapter in a text edited by Marci Green and published by Karnac and is based on the ideas explored in The Developing Mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (Guilford, 1999) and Parenting from the Inside Out: How a deeper self-understanding can help you raise children who thrive (with Mary Hartzell [2003]). It has been summarized in part in the article, The Mind, the Brain, and Human Relationships (Gynaelcology Forum International, 2003) and published online under the current title by Enneagram Monthly. KEY WORDS: attachment, neurobiology, parenting, relationships, brain development. INTRODUCTION The word \"attachment\" can evoke a wide range of responses from parents. For some it signifies a positive experience of the relationship between child and parent. For others, a sense of dread may emerge with the idea that somehow what has happened early in life will determine destiny without hope of liberation from patterns of the past. The old notion that our early life experiences somehow determine our fate can give you a sense of hopelessness: What is the point of learning about attachment if it just tells you that you are helpless to make a change as an adult? The fact of the matter is that this fatalistic notion is wrong. Carefully conducted scientific studies have shown us that it is not what happened to you that matters most in determining how you raise your children; instead, it is how you have come to make sense of your early life experiences that is the most robust predictor of how your children will become attached to you. Amazing, but true! In this writing I will invite you to sit down with me and explore the wonderfully intriguing ideas and accessible practical implementations of the science of attachment. In my own journeys through medical school and clinical psychiatry training and then into research in attachment, emotion, memory and narrative, I have come to realize how central attachment relationships are in our lives. What has fascinated me over the past ten years, the \"Decade of the Brain,\" is how our understanding of the role relationships play in our day-to-day subjective lives can be profoundly deepened by integrating the objective findings of an array of sciences. By exploring a wide range of sciences, from anthropology to neuroscience, and seeking the convergence of findings that emerges from their integration, we can arrive at a consilient view of the \"unity of knowledge\" (or \"consilience,\" as E.O. Wilson has used the term [1998]). In the Brittanica Dictionary, consilience is defined as \"the concurrence of generalizations from separate classes of facts in logical inductions so that one set of inductive laws is found to be in accord with another set of distinct derivation.\" In other words, as in the old Indian tale of the blind men and the elephant, there is a \"larger reality\" that exists, though any single perspective can only begin to describe one view ofthat reality. In the approach that we will take, the convergent view of science can be called \"interpersonal neurobiology,\" (Seigel, 1999), emphasizing the range from the interpersonal (such as perspectives from the fields of anthropology, communications, and social psychology) to the neurobiological (such as the views from evolutionary biology, and the domains of affective, cognitive, and developmental neuroscience). Why interpersonal neurobiology for parents? How does \"parenting with the brain in mind\" differ in any way from other approaches to helping parents raise children? Do parents really need to know about neurons to raise their children well? The answers to the first two questions, I hope, will be revealed as you read this article. The last question about the brain can be answered simply: \"No.\" Parents do not need to know about the brain. Research has shown that parents do need to know about themselves, not necessarily about neurons. However, I will suggest to you that having a mind filled with up-todate knowledge about the science of human experience, including the neurobiology of the human mind, can prepare parents to understand both themselves, and their children well. …","PeriodicalId":207385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attachment and self-understanding: parenting with the brain in mind 1\",\"authors\":\"D. Siegel\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429472039-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT: This article is an adaptation of a chapter in a text edited by Marci Green and published by Karnac and is based on the ideas explored in The Developing Mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (Guilford, 1999) and Parenting from the Inside Out: How a deeper self-understanding can help you raise children who thrive (with Mary Hartzell [2003]). It has been summarized in part in the article, The Mind, the Brain, and Human Relationships (Gynaelcology Forum International, 2003) and published online under the current title by Enneagram Monthly. KEY WORDS: attachment, neurobiology, parenting, relationships, brain development. INTRODUCTION The word \\\"attachment\\\" can evoke a wide range of responses from parents. For some it signifies a positive experience of the relationship between child and parent. For others, a sense of dread may emerge with the idea that somehow what has happened early in life will determine destiny without hope of liberation from patterns of the past. The old notion that our early life experiences somehow determine our fate can give you a sense of hopelessness: What is the point of learning about attachment if it just tells you that you are helpless to make a change as an adult? The fact of the matter is that this fatalistic notion is wrong. Carefully conducted scientific studies have shown us that it is not what happened to you that matters most in determining how you raise your children; instead, it is how you have come to make sense of your early life experiences that is the most robust predictor of how your children will become attached to you. Amazing, but true! In this writing I will invite you to sit down with me and explore the wonderfully intriguing ideas and accessible practical implementations of the science of attachment. In my own journeys through medical school and clinical psychiatry training and then into research in attachment, emotion, memory and narrative, I have come to realize how central attachment relationships are in our lives. What has fascinated me over the past ten years, the \\\"Decade of the Brain,\\\" is how our understanding of the role relationships play in our day-to-day subjective lives can be profoundly deepened by integrating the objective findings of an array of sciences. By exploring a wide range of sciences, from anthropology to neuroscience, and seeking the convergence of findings that emerges from their integration, we can arrive at a consilient view of the \\\"unity of knowledge\\\" (or \\\"consilience,\\\" as E.O. Wilson has used the term [1998]). In the Brittanica Dictionary, consilience is defined as \\\"the concurrence of generalizations from separate classes of facts in logical inductions so that one set of inductive laws is found to be in accord with another set of distinct derivation.\\\" In other words, as in the old Indian tale of the blind men and the elephant, there is a \\\"larger reality\\\" that exists, though any single perspective can only begin to describe one view ofthat reality. In the approach that we will take, the convergent view of science can be called \\\"interpersonal neurobiology,\\\" (Seigel, 1999), emphasizing the range from the interpersonal (such as perspectives from the fields of anthropology, communications, and social psychology) to the neurobiological (such as the views from evolutionary biology, and the domains of affective, cognitive, and developmental neuroscience). Why interpersonal neurobiology for parents? How does \\\"parenting with the brain in mind\\\" differ in any way from other approaches to helping parents raise children? Do parents really need to know about neurons to raise their children well? The answers to the first two questions, I hope, will be revealed as you read this article. The last question about the brain can be answered simply: \\\"No.\\\" Parents do not need to know about the brain. Research has shown that parents do need to know about themselves, not necessarily about neurons. However, I will suggest to you that having a mind filled with up-todate knowledge about the science of human experience, including the neurobiology of the human mind, can prepare parents to understand both themselves, and their children well. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":207385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429472039-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429472039-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

摘要:本文改编自Marci Green编辑并由Karnac出版的一篇文章中的一章,并基于《心智发展:人际关系和大脑如何相互作用塑造我们是谁》(Guilford, 1999)和《由内而外的养育:如何加深自我理解帮助你培养茁壮成长的孩子》(Mary Hartzell合著,2003)中探讨的观点。文章《心智、大脑和人际关系》(2003年国际妇科论坛)对此进行了部分总结,并以《九格月刊》的当前标题在线发表。关键词:依恋,神经生物学,育儿,关系,大脑发育。“依恋”这个词可以引起父母的各种各样的反应。对一些人来说,这意味着孩子和父母之间关系的积极体验。对另一些人来说,一种恐惧感可能会伴随着这样的想法出现:不知何故,生命早期发生的事情将决定命运,而没有希望从过去的模式中解放出来。我们早期的生活经历在某种程度上决定了我们的命运,这种古老的观念会给你一种绝望的感觉:如果它只是告诉你,你成年后无法做出改变,那么学习依恋的意义何在?事实是这种宿命论的观念是错误的。仔细进行的科学研究告诉我们,决定你如何抚养孩子的最重要因素不是你身上发生了什么;相反,你如何理解你的早期生活经历才是你的孩子会如何依恋你的最有力的预测因素。很神奇,但却是真的!在这篇文章中,我将邀请你坐下来和我一起探索依恋科学的奇妙有趣的想法和可接近的实际实施。在我自己的经历中,从医学院到临床精神病学培训,再到依恋、情感、记忆和叙事的研究,我逐渐意识到依恋关系在我们的生活中是多么重要。在过去的十年,也就是“大脑的十年”中,让我着迷的是,通过整合一系列科学的客观发现,我们如何深刻地加深对人际关系在我们日常主观生活中所扮演角色的理解。通过探索广泛的科学,从人类学到神经科学,并寻求从它们的整合中出现的发现的融合,我们可以达到对“知识统一”(或“一致性”,正如E.O.威尔逊所使用的术语[1998])的一致看法。在《大英词典》中,一致性被定义为“在逻辑归纳中,从不同类别的事实中归纳的一致,从而发现一组归纳定律与另一组不同的推导是一致的。”换句话说,就像古老的印度盲人和大象的故事一样,存在着一个“更大的现实”,尽管任何单一的视角都只能开始描述这个现实的一种观点。在我们将要采用的方法中,科学的趋同观点可以被称为“人际神经生物学”(Seigel, 1999),强调从人际(如人类学、传播学和社会心理学领域的观点)到神经生物学(如进化生物学的观点,以及情感、认知和发育神经科学领域的观点)的范围。为什么是父母的人际神经生物学?“以脑为本的育儿”与其他帮助父母养育孩子的方法有何不同?父母真的需要了解神经元才能把孩子养好吗?前两个问题的答案,我希望,将在您阅读本文时揭晓。关于大脑的最后一个问题可以简单地回答:“不。”父母不需要了解大脑。研究表明,父母确实需要了解自己,而不一定是神经元。然而,我要告诉你的是,拥有一个充满了关于人类经验科学的最新知识的头脑,包括人类心灵的神经生物学,可以让父母更好地了解自己和孩子。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attachment and self-understanding: parenting with the brain in mind 1
ABSTRACT: This article is an adaptation of a chapter in a text edited by Marci Green and published by Karnac and is based on the ideas explored in The Developing Mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (Guilford, 1999) and Parenting from the Inside Out: How a deeper self-understanding can help you raise children who thrive (with Mary Hartzell [2003]). It has been summarized in part in the article, The Mind, the Brain, and Human Relationships (Gynaelcology Forum International, 2003) and published online under the current title by Enneagram Monthly. KEY WORDS: attachment, neurobiology, parenting, relationships, brain development. INTRODUCTION The word "attachment" can evoke a wide range of responses from parents. For some it signifies a positive experience of the relationship between child and parent. For others, a sense of dread may emerge with the idea that somehow what has happened early in life will determine destiny without hope of liberation from patterns of the past. The old notion that our early life experiences somehow determine our fate can give you a sense of hopelessness: What is the point of learning about attachment if it just tells you that you are helpless to make a change as an adult? The fact of the matter is that this fatalistic notion is wrong. Carefully conducted scientific studies have shown us that it is not what happened to you that matters most in determining how you raise your children; instead, it is how you have come to make sense of your early life experiences that is the most robust predictor of how your children will become attached to you. Amazing, but true! In this writing I will invite you to sit down with me and explore the wonderfully intriguing ideas and accessible practical implementations of the science of attachment. In my own journeys through medical school and clinical psychiatry training and then into research in attachment, emotion, memory and narrative, I have come to realize how central attachment relationships are in our lives. What has fascinated me over the past ten years, the "Decade of the Brain," is how our understanding of the role relationships play in our day-to-day subjective lives can be profoundly deepened by integrating the objective findings of an array of sciences. By exploring a wide range of sciences, from anthropology to neuroscience, and seeking the convergence of findings that emerges from their integration, we can arrive at a consilient view of the "unity of knowledge" (or "consilience," as E.O. Wilson has used the term [1998]). In the Brittanica Dictionary, consilience is defined as "the concurrence of generalizations from separate classes of facts in logical inductions so that one set of inductive laws is found to be in accord with another set of distinct derivation." In other words, as in the old Indian tale of the blind men and the elephant, there is a "larger reality" that exists, though any single perspective can only begin to describe one view ofthat reality. In the approach that we will take, the convergent view of science can be called "interpersonal neurobiology," (Seigel, 1999), emphasizing the range from the interpersonal (such as perspectives from the fields of anthropology, communications, and social psychology) to the neurobiological (such as the views from evolutionary biology, and the domains of affective, cognitive, and developmental neuroscience). Why interpersonal neurobiology for parents? How does "parenting with the brain in mind" differ in any way from other approaches to helping parents raise children? Do parents really need to know about neurons to raise their children well? The answers to the first two questions, I hope, will be revealed as you read this article. The last question about the brain can be answered simply: "No." Parents do not need to know about the brain. Research has shown that parents do need to know about themselves, not necessarily about neurons. However, I will suggest to you that having a mind filled with up-todate knowledge about the science of human experience, including the neurobiology of the human mind, can prepare parents to understand both themselves, and their children well. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信