{"title":"LF模型的替代方案","authors":"Rnj Raymond Veldhuis","doi":"10.1037/e496772004-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An alternative for the Liljencrants-Fant (LF) glottal-pulse model is presented. This alternative is derived from the Rosenberg model, so we have caned it the Rosenberg++ model. It is described by the same set of Tor R parameters as the LF model but has the advantage over the LF model that it is computationally simple, which allows its use in real-time speech synthesizers. The Rosenberg++ model is compared with the LF model in a psycho-acoustic experiment, from which we conclude that in a practical situation it is capable of producing synthetic speech which is perceptually equivalent to speech generated with the LF model.","PeriodicalId":369207,"journal":{"name":"IPO Annual Progress Report","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An alternative for the LF model\",\"authors\":\"Rnj Raymond Veldhuis\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e496772004-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An alternative for the Liljencrants-Fant (LF) glottal-pulse model is presented. This alternative is derived from the Rosenberg model, so we have caned it the Rosenberg++ model. It is described by the same set of Tor R parameters as the LF model but has the advantage over the LF model that it is computationally simple, which allows its use in real-time speech synthesizers. The Rosenberg++ model is compared with the LF model in a psycho-acoustic experiment, from which we conclude that in a practical situation it is capable of producing synthetic speech which is perceptually equivalent to speech generated with the LF model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IPO Annual Progress Report\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IPO Annual Progress Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e496772004-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPO Annual Progress Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e496772004-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An alternative for the Liljencrants-Fant (LF) glottal-pulse model is presented. This alternative is derived from the Rosenberg model, so we have caned it the Rosenberg++ model. It is described by the same set of Tor R parameters as the LF model but has the advantage over the LF model that it is computationally simple, which allows its use in real-time speech synthesizers. The Rosenberg++ model is compared with the LF model in a psycho-acoustic experiment, from which we conclude that in a practical situation it is capable of producing synthetic speech which is perceptually equivalent to speech generated with the LF model.