决策过程中的本体

Ihor Karpov, Eugene Burov
{"title":"决策过程中的本体","authors":"Ihor Karpov, Eugene Burov","doi":"10.31891/2307-5732-2023-319-1-149-153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decision making is a key activity for management in any organization. Several decision-making techniques are used to facilitate this process, including multi-criteria decision-making, especially when the decision involves multiple stakeholders and multiple criteria. These methods, which evaluate each alternative according to a set of criteria, are usually subjective in nature. However, even though they are subjective, it is important to ensure that decision makers have as much knowledge as possible about the alternatives. This would include understanding all the consequences of each alternative and all the effects of those consequences. This requires a deep understanding of the area in which the decision is made. Organizational ontology provides such an understanding. An ontology defines a common vocabulary for researchers who need to exchange information in a field. Ontologies are used in several fields, including artificial intelligence. Since the goal of artificial intelligence is to make machines sophisticated enough to integrate information content, knowledge organization is a very important step towards achieving this goal. This move gave rise to knowledge engineering, which relies heavily on ontologies as a means of representing and organizing knowledge. Identifying the consequences for each alternative is an extremely important component of the entire decision-making process. It is imperative that the decision maker considers not only the direct consequences, but also tries to identify the indirect consequences. One way to do this is to identify all the business processes that will be affected by each alternative, and then examine those business processes in detail to determine the full extent (i.e., consequences) of the business process impact. However, to do this effectively, one must analyze the subject area, which in turn requires that knowledge about the subject area be represented in a structure that facilitates this analysis.","PeriodicalId":386560,"journal":{"name":"Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Technical sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ONTOLOGIES IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS\",\"authors\":\"Ihor Karpov, Eugene Burov\",\"doi\":\"10.31891/2307-5732-2023-319-1-149-153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decision making is a key activity for management in any organization. Several decision-making techniques are used to facilitate this process, including multi-criteria decision-making, especially when the decision involves multiple stakeholders and multiple criteria. These methods, which evaluate each alternative according to a set of criteria, are usually subjective in nature. However, even though they are subjective, it is important to ensure that decision makers have as much knowledge as possible about the alternatives. This would include understanding all the consequences of each alternative and all the effects of those consequences. This requires a deep understanding of the area in which the decision is made. Organizational ontology provides such an understanding. An ontology defines a common vocabulary for researchers who need to exchange information in a field. Ontologies are used in several fields, including artificial intelligence. Since the goal of artificial intelligence is to make machines sophisticated enough to integrate information content, knowledge organization is a very important step towards achieving this goal. This move gave rise to knowledge engineering, which relies heavily on ontologies as a means of representing and organizing knowledge. Identifying the consequences for each alternative is an extremely important component of the entire decision-making process. It is imperative that the decision maker considers not only the direct consequences, but also tries to identify the indirect consequences. One way to do this is to identify all the business processes that will be affected by each alternative, and then examine those business processes in detail to determine the full extent (i.e., consequences) of the business process impact. However, to do this effectively, one must analyze the subject area, which in turn requires that knowledge about the subject area be represented in a structure that facilitates this analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Technical sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Technical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5732-2023-319-1-149-153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Technical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5732-2023-319-1-149-153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

决策是任何组织管理的一项关键活动。一些决策技术用于促进这一过程,包括多准则决策,特别是当决策涉及多个利益相关者和多个标准时。这些方法根据一套标准对每个备选方案进行评估,本质上通常是主观的。然而,即使它们是主观的,重要的是要确保决策者对备选方案有尽可能多的了解。这将包括理解每种选择的所有后果以及这些后果的所有影响。这需要对做出决策的领域有深刻的理解。组织本体提供了这样一种理解。本体为需要在某个领域交换信息的研究人员定义了一个通用词汇表。本体在包括人工智能在内的许多领域都有应用。由于人工智能的目标是使机器足够复杂以集成信息内容,因此知识组织是实现这一目标的非常重要的一步。这一举措产生了知识工程,它严重依赖于本体作为表示和组织知识的手段。确定每种选择的后果是整个决策过程中极其重要的组成部分。决策者不仅要考虑直接后果,而且要设法确定间接后果,这是至关重要的。实现这一目标的一种方法是识别所有将受到每种备选方案影响的业务流程,然后详细检查这些业务流程,以确定业务流程影响的全部范围(即后果)。然而,要有效地做到这一点,就必须分析主题领域,这反过来又要求在促进分析的结构中表示关于主题领域的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ONTOLOGIES IN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
Decision making is a key activity for management in any organization. Several decision-making techniques are used to facilitate this process, including multi-criteria decision-making, especially when the decision involves multiple stakeholders and multiple criteria. These methods, which evaluate each alternative according to a set of criteria, are usually subjective in nature. However, even though they are subjective, it is important to ensure that decision makers have as much knowledge as possible about the alternatives. This would include understanding all the consequences of each alternative and all the effects of those consequences. This requires a deep understanding of the area in which the decision is made. Organizational ontology provides such an understanding. An ontology defines a common vocabulary for researchers who need to exchange information in a field. Ontologies are used in several fields, including artificial intelligence. Since the goal of artificial intelligence is to make machines sophisticated enough to integrate information content, knowledge organization is a very important step towards achieving this goal. This move gave rise to knowledge engineering, which relies heavily on ontologies as a means of representing and organizing knowledge. Identifying the consequences for each alternative is an extremely important component of the entire decision-making process. It is imperative that the decision maker considers not only the direct consequences, but also tries to identify the indirect consequences. One way to do this is to identify all the business processes that will be affected by each alternative, and then examine those business processes in detail to determine the full extent (i.e., consequences) of the business process impact. However, to do this effectively, one must analyze the subject area, which in turn requires that knowledge about the subject area be represented in a structure that facilitates this analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信