特发性脊柱侧凸联合置入椎弓根螺钉与徒手技术的疗效比较分析

S. Kolesov, V. S. Kolyan, A. I. Kazmin, E. V. Gulaev
{"title":"特发性脊柱侧凸联合置入椎弓根螺钉与徒手技术的疗效比较分析","authors":"S. Kolesov, V. S. Kolyan, A. I. Kazmin, E. V. Gulaev","doi":"10.14531/ss2022.2.12-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To analyze intraoperative data and results of treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis with two options of the open insertion of pedicle screws using the free-hand technique.Material and Methods. The data of 457 patients aged 16–35 years who underwent surgical treatment for idiopathic scoliosis by one surgeon were analyzed. In 236 patients (Group I), the screws were placed manually, and in 221 (Group II) – using power tool. The preparation of the canal for pedicle screws in both groups was performed using the free-hand technique. The correct position of the screws wasassessed intraoperatively using an image intensifier and neurophysiological monitoring. The duration of surgery and X-ray monitoring, blood loss, and the presence of intra- and postoperative complications were assessed.Results. In Group I, 4243 screws were inserted, and in Group II – 3978. The correct position of pedicle screws was recorded in 89.1 % of cases in Group I, and in 89.6 % of cases in Goup II. In Group I, the incorrect position of anchor elements was detected in 10.9 % of cases, and in Group II – in 10.4 % of cases. The number of screws re-positioned intraoperatively corresponded to the number of incorrectly positioned screws. There was a statistically significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss and duration of surgery betweenpatients of both groups (p < 0.05).Conclusion. The development and active introduction of high-tech methods of surgical treatment of spinal deformities increase the number of interventions performed annually. The proposed combined method of surgical treatment seems to be optimal because manual formation of the canal reduces the risk of intraoperative complications, and the use of power tool during screw placement shortens duration of surgery and reduces blood loss.","PeriodicalId":337711,"journal":{"name":"Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the combined method of inserting pedicle screws with the free-hand technique in patients with idiopathic scoliosis\",\"authors\":\"S. Kolesov, V. S. Kolyan, A. I. Kazmin, E. V. Gulaev\",\"doi\":\"10.14531/ss2022.2.12-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To analyze intraoperative data and results of treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis with two options of the open insertion of pedicle screws using the free-hand technique.Material and Methods. The data of 457 patients aged 16–35 years who underwent surgical treatment for idiopathic scoliosis by one surgeon were analyzed. In 236 patients (Group I), the screws were placed manually, and in 221 (Group II) – using power tool. The preparation of the canal for pedicle screws in both groups was performed using the free-hand technique. The correct position of the screws wasassessed intraoperatively using an image intensifier and neurophysiological monitoring. The duration of surgery and X-ray monitoring, blood loss, and the presence of intra- and postoperative complications were assessed.Results. In Group I, 4243 screws were inserted, and in Group II – 3978. The correct position of pedicle screws was recorded in 89.1 % of cases in Group I, and in 89.6 % of cases in Goup II. In Group I, the incorrect position of anchor elements was detected in 10.9 % of cases, and in Group II – in 10.4 % of cases. The number of screws re-positioned intraoperatively corresponded to the number of incorrectly positioned screws. There was a statistically significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss and duration of surgery betweenpatients of both groups (p < 0.05).Conclusion. The development and active introduction of high-tech methods of surgical treatment of spinal deformities increase the number of interventions performed annually. The proposed combined method of surgical treatment seems to be optimal because manual formation of the canal reduces the risk of intraoperative complications, and the use of power tool during screw placement shortens duration of surgery and reduces blood loss.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery)\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2022.2.12-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14531/ss2022.2.12-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目标。目的分析徒手技术两种开放式椎弓根螺钉置入治疗特发性脊柱侧凸的术中资料和结果。材料和方法。本文分析了457例16-35岁的特发性脊柱侧凸手术治疗患者的资料。236例患者(第一组)手动放置螺钉,221例(第二组)使用电动工具放置螺钉。两组均采用徒手技术准备椎弓根螺钉管。术中使用图像增强器和神经生理监测评估螺钉的正确位置。评估手术时间、x线监测、出血量、术中及术后并发症的发生情况。第一组置入4243枚螺钉,第二组置入3978枚螺钉。第一组和第二组的椎弓根螺钉位置正确率分别为89.1%和89.6%。在第一组中,10.9%的病例检测到锚定元件位置不正确,而在第二组中,10.4%的病例检测到锚定元件位置不正确。术中重新定位的螺钉数量与错误定位的螺钉数量相对应。两组患者术中出血量及手术时间比较,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。高科技脊柱畸形手术治疗方法的发展和积极引入增加了每年进行的干预数量。所提出的联合手术治疗方法似乎是最佳的,因为人工形成管减少了术中并发症的风险,并且在放置螺钉时使用电动工具缩短了手术时间并减少了失血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the combined method of inserting pedicle screws with the free-hand technique in patients with idiopathic scoliosis
Objective. To analyze intraoperative data and results of treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis with two options of the open insertion of pedicle screws using the free-hand technique.Material and Methods. The data of 457 patients aged 16–35 years who underwent surgical treatment for idiopathic scoliosis by one surgeon were analyzed. In 236 patients (Group I), the screws were placed manually, and in 221 (Group II) – using power tool. The preparation of the canal for pedicle screws in both groups was performed using the free-hand technique. The correct position of the screws wasassessed intraoperatively using an image intensifier and neurophysiological monitoring. The duration of surgery and X-ray monitoring, blood loss, and the presence of intra- and postoperative complications were assessed.Results. In Group I, 4243 screws were inserted, and in Group II – 3978. The correct position of pedicle screws was recorded in 89.1 % of cases in Group I, and in 89.6 % of cases in Goup II. In Group I, the incorrect position of anchor elements was detected in 10.9 % of cases, and in Group II – in 10.4 % of cases. The number of screws re-positioned intraoperatively corresponded to the number of incorrectly positioned screws. There was a statistically significant difference in the volume of intraoperative blood loss and duration of surgery betweenpatients of both groups (p < 0.05).Conclusion. The development and active introduction of high-tech methods of surgical treatment of spinal deformities increase the number of interventions performed annually. The proposed combined method of surgical treatment seems to be optimal because manual formation of the canal reduces the risk of intraoperative complications, and the use of power tool during screw placement shortens duration of surgery and reduces blood loss.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信