操作系统稳健性预测与选择

Xiaoen Ju, Hengming Zou
{"title":"操作系统稳健性预测与选择","authors":"Xiaoen Ju, Hengming Zou","doi":"10.1109/ISSRE.2008.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) operating systems (OS) have long been widely used, the issue regarding their robustness is far from being solved. Although many efforts have been made in this research domain, people still find it difficult to make choices among various OSs for robustness concerns. This paper proposes a reference model for OS robustness forecast and selection that aims to forecast the robustness of specific OSs under given operational profiles. At the same time, the model can select appropriate OSs as development/operating platforms that meet the particular robustness requirements of the target workloads. Our model combines OSspsila overall robustness with operational profiles and uses extensive tests on OS APIs to make our calculation. We have measured 255 APIs and C-library functions on windows XP and Vista, and 197 C-library functions on Linux 2.6.22 (Ubuntu 7.10). Our results show that on average Windows XP and Vista are more robust than Linux, but their performances are comparable under compute-intensive workloads. A demonstration of how these results are used in the proposed reference model for OSs robustness forecast and selection is given at the end.","PeriodicalId":448275,"journal":{"name":"2008 19th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operating System Robustness Forecast and Selection\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoen Ju, Hengming Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSRE.2008.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) operating systems (OS) have long been widely used, the issue regarding their robustness is far from being solved. Although many efforts have been made in this research domain, people still find it difficult to make choices among various OSs for robustness concerns. This paper proposes a reference model for OS robustness forecast and selection that aims to forecast the robustness of specific OSs under given operational profiles. At the same time, the model can select appropriate OSs as development/operating platforms that meet the particular robustness requirements of the target workloads. Our model combines OSspsila overall robustness with operational profiles and uses extensive tests on OS APIs to make our calculation. We have measured 255 APIs and C-library functions on windows XP and Vista, and 197 C-library functions on Linux 2.6.22 (Ubuntu 7.10). Our results show that on average Windows XP and Vista are more robust than Linux, but their performances are comparable under compute-intensive workloads. A demonstration of how these results are used in the proposed reference model for OSs robustness forecast and selection is given at the end.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 19th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 19th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.2008.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 19th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSRE.2008.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

虽然商用现货(COTS)操作系统(OS)已经被广泛使用了很长时间,但是关于其健壮性的问题还远远没有得到解决。尽管在这一研究领域已经做出了很多努力,但人们仍然发现很难在各种操作系统中做出鲁棒性选择。本文提出了一个操作系统鲁棒性预测和选择的参考模型,该模型旨在预测特定操作系统在给定操作条件下的鲁棒性。同时,该模型可以选择合适的操作系统作为开发/操作平台,满足目标工作负载的特定健壮性需求。我们的模型结合了OSspsila的整体健壮性和操作配置文件,并在OS api上进行了广泛的测试来进行计算。我们在windows XP和Vista上测试了255个api和c库函数,在Linux 2.6.22 (Ubuntu 7.10)上测试了197个c库函数。我们的结果显示,平均而言,Windows XP和Vista比Linux更健壮,但在计算密集型工作负载下,它们的性能不相上下。最后给出了如何将这些结果用于os鲁棒性预测和选择的参考模型的演示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operating System Robustness Forecast and Selection
While commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) operating systems (OS) have long been widely used, the issue regarding their robustness is far from being solved. Although many efforts have been made in this research domain, people still find it difficult to make choices among various OSs for robustness concerns. This paper proposes a reference model for OS robustness forecast and selection that aims to forecast the robustness of specific OSs under given operational profiles. At the same time, the model can select appropriate OSs as development/operating platforms that meet the particular robustness requirements of the target workloads. Our model combines OSspsila overall robustness with operational profiles and uses extensive tests on OS APIs to make our calculation. We have measured 255 APIs and C-library functions on windows XP and Vista, and 197 C-library functions on Linux 2.6.22 (Ubuntu 7.10). Our results show that on average Windows XP and Vista are more robust than Linux, but their performances are comparable under compute-intensive workloads. A demonstration of how these results are used in the proposed reference model for OSs robustness forecast and selection is given at the end.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信