为什么市场实验比看起来更难:测试控制干扰的作用

Thomas Blake, Dominic Coey
{"title":"为什么市场实验比看起来更难:测试控制干扰的作用","authors":"Thomas Blake, Dominic Coey","doi":"10.1145/2600057.2602837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical statistical inference of experimental data assumes that the treatment affects the test group but not the control group. This assumption will typically be violated when experimenting in marketplaces because of general equilibrium effects: changing test demand affects the supply available to the control group. We illustrate this with an email marketing campaign performed by eBay. Ignoring test-control interference leads to estimates of the campaign's effectiveness which are too large by a factor of around two. We present the simple economics of this bias in a supply and demand framework, showing that the bias is larger in magnitude where there is more inelastic supply, and is positive if demand is elastic.","PeriodicalId":203155,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"86","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why marketplace experimentation is harder than it seems: the role of test-control interference\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Blake, Dominic Coey\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2600057.2602837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classical statistical inference of experimental data assumes that the treatment affects the test group but not the control group. This assumption will typically be violated when experimenting in marketplaces because of general equilibrium effects: changing test demand affects the supply available to the control group. We illustrate this with an email marketing campaign performed by eBay. Ignoring test-control interference leads to estimates of the campaign's effectiveness which are too large by a factor of around two. We present the simple economics of this bias in a supply and demand framework, showing that the bias is larger in magnitude where there is more inelastic supply, and is positive if demand is elastic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"86\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600057.2602837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600057.2602837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 86

摘要

经典的实验数据统计推断假设治疗只影响试验组而不影响对照组。当在市场上进行实验时,由于一般均衡效应,这个假设通常会被违反:改变测试需求会影响对照组的可用供应。我们用eBay执行的电子邮件营销活动来说明这一点。忽略测试控制的干扰会导致对活动有效性的估计过高,大约高出两倍。我们在供需框架中提出了这种偏差的简单经济学,表明在非弹性供应较多的情况下,偏差的幅度较大,如果需求是弹性的,则偏差是正的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why marketplace experimentation is harder than it seems: the role of test-control interference
Classical statistical inference of experimental data assumes that the treatment affects the test group but not the control group. This assumption will typically be violated when experimenting in marketplaces because of general equilibrium effects: changing test demand affects the supply available to the control group. We illustrate this with an email marketing campaign performed by eBay. Ignoring test-control interference leads to estimates of the campaign's effectiveness which are too large by a factor of around two. We present the simple economics of this bias in a supply and demand framework, showing that the bias is larger in magnitude where there is more inelastic supply, and is positive if demand is elastic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信