菊花与剑:当代组织传播理论与研究读本

C. Conrad
{"title":"菊花与剑:当代组织传播理论与研究读本","authors":"C. Conrad","doi":"10.1080/10417948509372631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CERTAIN TRUTHS ABOUT THE SOCIAL SCIENCES today seem self‐evident. One is that in recent years there has been an enormous amount of genre mixing in social science, as in intellectual life generally, and such blurring of kinds is continuing apace. Another is that many social scientists have turned away from a laws‐and‐instances ideal of explanation toward a cases‐and‐interpretations one, looking less for the sort of thing that connects planets and pendulums and more for the sort that connects chrysanthemums and swords. … Something is happening to the way we think about the way we think (Geertz, 1970, pp. 165, 166).","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chrysanthemums and swords: A reading of contemporary organizational communication theory and research\",\"authors\":\"C. Conrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417948509372631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CERTAIN TRUTHS ABOUT THE SOCIAL SCIENCES today seem self‐evident. One is that in recent years there has been an enormous amount of genre mixing in social science, as in intellectual life generally, and such blurring of kinds is continuing apace. Another is that many social scientists have turned away from a laws‐and‐instances ideal of explanation toward a cases‐and‐interpretations one, looking less for the sort of thing that connects planets and pendulums and more for the sort that connects chrysanthemums and swords. … Something is happening to the way we think about the way we think (Geertz, 1970, pp. 165, 166).\",\"PeriodicalId\":234061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Speech Communication Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

当今社会科学的某些真理似乎是不言而喻的。其一,近年来,在社会科学领域,就像在一般的智力生活领域一样,出现了大量的流派混合,而且这种类型的模糊还在继续迅速发展。另一个原因是,许多社会科学家已经从“定律和实例”的理想解释转向了“案例和解释”的理想解释,较少寻找行星和钟摆之间的联系,而更多地寻找菊花和剑之间的联系。……我们思考自己思考方式的方式正在发生变化(Geertz, 1970, pp. 165, 166)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chrysanthemums and swords: A reading of contemporary organizational communication theory and research
CERTAIN TRUTHS ABOUT THE SOCIAL SCIENCES today seem self‐evident. One is that in recent years there has been an enormous amount of genre mixing in social science, as in intellectual life generally, and such blurring of kinds is continuing apace. Another is that many social scientists have turned away from a laws‐and‐instances ideal of explanation toward a cases‐and‐interpretations one, looking less for the sort of thing that connects planets and pendulums and more for the sort that connects chrysanthemums and swords. … Something is happening to the way we think about the way we think (Geertz, 1970, pp. 165, 166).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信