群体导向型国家人际关系分类效应的实证研究

Ichiro Furukawa
{"title":"群体导向型国家人际关系分类效应的实证研究","authors":"Ichiro Furukawa","doi":"10.15057/28213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theory of reasoned action (Ajzen and Fishbein (1977)) is one of the most well known concepts used in quantitative analysis in marketing research. In addition to its simple structure, predictive power, and diagnostic information associated with marketing actions, it includes two clearly distinct independent factors, that is, attitude and social norm for the intention of choice alternatives. Because characteristics of this model are so attractive and flexible, the theory of reasoned action model can be adapted from collectivistic regions to individualistic regions. However, we have little knowledge about whether or not this model works satisfactorily in strong group-oriented countries where social norms can surpass individual attitudes for choice alternatives (which is the definition of a group-oriented society). In this paper, data collected from Japan, China and Taiwan were analyzed using factor analysis and structural equation modeling. By investigating the empirical results with a focus on the effect of personal relationship classification, we show that care should be exercised in using the reasoned action model in countries that have strong group-orientation.","PeriodicalId":154016,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EMPIRICAL STUDY OF PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP CLASSIFICATION EFFECT AMONG GROUP-ORIENTED COUNTRIES\",\"authors\":\"Ichiro Furukawa\",\"doi\":\"10.15057/28213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The theory of reasoned action (Ajzen and Fishbein (1977)) is one of the most well known concepts used in quantitative analysis in marketing research. In addition to its simple structure, predictive power, and diagnostic information associated with marketing actions, it includes two clearly distinct independent factors, that is, attitude and social norm for the intention of choice alternatives. Because characteristics of this model are so attractive and flexible, the theory of reasoned action model can be adapted from collectivistic regions to individualistic regions. However, we have little knowledge about whether or not this model works satisfactorily in strong group-oriented countries where social norms can surpass individual attitudes for choice alternatives (which is the definition of a group-oriented society). In this paper, data collected from Japan, China and Taiwan were analyzed using factor analysis and structural equation modeling. By investigating the empirical results with a focus on the effect of personal relationship classification, we show that care should be exercised in using the reasoned action model in countries that have strong group-orientation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15057/28213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of commerce and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/28213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

理性行为理论(Ajzen和Fishbein(1977))是市场研究中定量分析中最著名的概念之一。除了简单的结构、预测能力和与营销行为相关的诊断信息外,它还包括两个明显不同的独立因素,即态度和社会规范对选择方案的意图。由于理性行为模型的特点具有很强的吸引力和灵活性,因此理性行为模型理论可以从集体主义地区适用于个人主义地区。然而,我们对这种模式是否在强大的群体导向国家令人满意地工作知之甚少,在那里,社会规范可以超越个人对选择的态度(这是群体导向社会的定义)。本文采用因子分析和结构方程模型对日本、中国和台湾地区的数据进行分析。通过对个人关系分类影响的实证结果的调查,我们表明,在具有强烈群体取向的国家,应谨慎使用理性行为模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EMPIRICAL STUDY OF PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP CLASSIFICATION EFFECT AMONG GROUP-ORIENTED COUNTRIES
The theory of reasoned action (Ajzen and Fishbein (1977)) is one of the most well known concepts used in quantitative analysis in marketing research. In addition to its simple structure, predictive power, and diagnostic information associated with marketing actions, it includes two clearly distinct independent factors, that is, attitude and social norm for the intention of choice alternatives. Because characteristics of this model are so attractive and flexible, the theory of reasoned action model can be adapted from collectivistic regions to individualistic regions. However, we have little knowledge about whether or not this model works satisfactorily in strong group-oriented countries where social norms can surpass individual attitudes for choice alternatives (which is the definition of a group-oriented society). In this paper, data collected from Japan, China and Taiwan were analyzed using factor analysis and structural equation modeling. By investigating the empirical results with a focus on the effect of personal relationship classification, we show that care should be exercised in using the reasoned action model in countries that have strong group-orientation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信