植物防御活化剂对辣椒细菌性叶斑病抗性生化基线的测定

Zaid Bin Tahir, Abuzar Hasnain
{"title":"植物防御活化剂对辣椒细菌性叶斑病抗性生化基线的测定","authors":"Zaid Bin Tahir, Abuzar Hasnain","doi":"10.22194/jgias/11.1031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Present study was designed to determine the progressive alterations in the leaves of chilli after the application of plant activators to pave the way towards fruitful management of bacterial leaf spots of chilli. Different plant defense activators such as KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and salicylic acid were used and alterations in the biochemicals of chilli were quantified by following standard protocols. In the first experiment, KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and salicylic acid were evaluated at a different concentration under field conditions. Application of salicylic acid expressed less disease incidence (21.111), followed by K2HPO4 (25.167) and KH2PO4 (28.889) as compared to the control. Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP) were quantified with the application of salicylic acid (0.9285, 0.9297, 0.9347, 1.2278, 0.6663, 0.6804 and 0.6723) followed by K2HPO4 (0.6502, 0.6605, 0.6544, 0.7689, 0.5122, 0.5322 and 0.5222) and KH2PO4 (0.4729, 0.4713, 0.4778, 0.4522, 0.3544, 0.3744 and 0.3644) µg/g. Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used for the field experiments.","PeriodicalId":303968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of biochemical baseline of resistance against bacterial leaf spot of chilli after application of plant defense activators\",\"authors\":\"Zaid Bin Tahir, Abuzar Hasnain\",\"doi\":\"10.22194/jgias/11.1031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Present study was designed to determine the progressive alterations in the leaves of chilli after the application of plant activators to pave the way towards fruitful management of bacterial leaf spots of chilli. Different plant defense activators such as KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and salicylic acid were used and alterations in the biochemicals of chilli were quantified by following standard protocols. In the first experiment, KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and salicylic acid were evaluated at a different concentration under field conditions. Application of salicylic acid expressed less disease incidence (21.111), followed by K2HPO4 (25.167) and KH2PO4 (28.889) as compared to the control. Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP) were quantified with the application of salicylic acid (0.9285, 0.9297, 0.9347, 1.2278, 0.6663, 0.6804 and 0.6723) followed by K2HPO4 (0.6502, 0.6605, 0.6544, 0.7689, 0.5122, 0.5322 and 0.5222) and KH2PO4 (0.4729, 0.4713, 0.4778, 0.4522, 0.3544, 0.3744 and 0.3644) µg/g. Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used for the field experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22194/jgias/11.1031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22194/jgias/11.1031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定植物激活剂应用后辣椒叶片的渐进式变化,为辣椒细菌性叶斑病的有效管理铺平道路。采用不同的植物防御激活剂,如k2po4、K2HPO4和水杨酸,并按照标准方案量化辣椒的生化变化。第一个试验在田间条件下对不同浓度的KH2PO4、K2HPO4和水杨酸进行了评价。与对照相比,水杨酸处理的发病率较低(21.111),其次是K2HPO4(25.167)和KH2PO4(28.889)。以水杨酸(0.9285、0.9297、0.9347、1.2278、0.6663、0.6804和0.6723)、K2HPO4(0.6502、0.6605、0.6544、0.7689、0.5122、0.5322和0.5222)和KH2PO4(0.4729、0.4713、0.4778、0.4522、0.3544、0.3744和0.3644)µg/g分别测定生物分子(SOD、POD、CAT、H2O2、TSS和TSP)的变化。田间试验采用随机完全区组设计(RCBD)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determination of biochemical baseline of resistance against bacterial leaf spot of chilli after application of plant defense activators
Present study was designed to determine the progressive alterations in the leaves of chilli after the application of plant activators to pave the way towards fruitful management of bacterial leaf spots of chilli. Different plant defense activators such as KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and salicylic acid were used and alterations in the biochemicals of chilli were quantified by following standard protocols. In the first experiment, KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and salicylic acid were evaluated at a different concentration under field conditions. Application of salicylic acid expressed less disease incidence (21.111), followed by K2HPO4 (25.167) and KH2PO4 (28.889) as compared to the control. Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP) were quantified with the application of salicylic acid (0.9285, 0.9297, 0.9347, 1.2278, 0.6663, 0.6804 and 0.6723) followed by K2HPO4 (0.6502, 0.6605, 0.6544, 0.7689, 0.5122, 0.5322 and 0.5222) and KH2PO4 (0.4729, 0.4713, 0.4778, 0.4522, 0.3544, 0.3744 and 0.3644) µg/g. Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used for the field experiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信