{"title":"两种例外情况下EDAS方法的简单修改","authors":"Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee","doi":"10.54646/bijamr.2022.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and techniques have been applied to many real-world problems in different fields of engineering science and technology. The evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method is an efficient MCDM method. The aim of this study is to propose a modification to address two exceptional cases in which the EDAS method fails to solve an MCDM problem.","PeriodicalId":360745,"journal":{"name":"BOHR International Journal of Advances in Management Research","volume":"43 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simple Modification to the EDAS Method for Two Exceptional Cases\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee\",\"doi\":\"10.54646/bijamr.2022.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and techniques have been applied to many real-world problems in different fields of engineering science and technology. The evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method is an efficient MCDM method. The aim of this study is to propose a modification to address two exceptional cases in which the EDAS method fails to solve an MCDM problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BOHR International Journal of Advances in Management Research\",\"volume\":\"43 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BOHR International Journal of Advances in Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54646/bijamr.2022.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BOHR International Journal of Advances in Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54646/bijamr.2022.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Simple Modification to the EDAS Method for Two Exceptional Cases
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and techniques have been applied to many real-world problems in different fields of engineering science and technology. The evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method is an efficient MCDM method. The aim of this study is to propose a modification to address two exceptional cases in which the EDAS method fails to solve an MCDM problem.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
