离心机电阻率指数的无线采集- WiRI:三种Pc-RI方法的比较研究

Quentin Danielczick, Ata Nepesov, Laurent Rochereau, S. Lescoulie, Victor De Oliveira Fernandes, B. Nicot
{"title":"离心机电阻率指数的无线采集- WiRI:三种Pc-RI方法的比较研究","authors":"Quentin Danielczick, Ata Nepesov, Laurent Rochereau, S. Lescoulie, Victor De Oliveira Fernandes, B. Nicot","doi":"10.30632/pjv64n3-2023a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological improvements and innovations are made to offer solutions with superior efficiency in terms of cost, quality, speed, or all of them. In the special core analysis (SCAL) field, the conventional resistivity index measurement (the porous plate technique) is a cost-effective method that provides good-quality results but is very time consuming. For this purpose, several methods were developed to reduce the time taken to acquire resistivity measurements. In 2017, we proposed the ultra-fast capillary pressure and resistivity index measurements (UFPCRI) combining centrifugation, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging, and resistivity profiling. Since 2021, the wireless resistivity index (WiRI) method allows the acquisition of capillary pressure and resistivity index in a matter of days. This method is based on a new in-house system to acquire wirelessly resistivity indexes along a rock sample during centrifugation. The determination of the resistivity vs. saturation curve and the n exponent of Archie’s law is done thanks to an optimization algorithm. In this paper, we present the results obtained from multiple simulations and experiments for WiRI, UFPCRI, and porous plate to discuss the advantages and drawbacks of each method in terms of reliability and experimental duration. Six rock samples are studied. A comparison of the three methods regarding Archie’s n exponent, resistivity indexes, and capillary pressure curves is performed.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wireless Acquisition for Resistivity Index in Centrifuge – WiRI: A Comparative Study of Three Pc-RI Methods\",\"authors\":\"Quentin Danielczick, Ata Nepesov, Laurent Rochereau, S. Lescoulie, Victor De Oliveira Fernandes, B. Nicot\",\"doi\":\"10.30632/pjv64n3-2023a2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technological improvements and innovations are made to offer solutions with superior efficiency in terms of cost, quality, speed, or all of them. In the special core analysis (SCAL) field, the conventional resistivity index measurement (the porous plate technique) is a cost-effective method that provides good-quality results but is very time consuming. For this purpose, several methods were developed to reduce the time taken to acquire resistivity measurements. In 2017, we proposed the ultra-fast capillary pressure and resistivity index measurements (UFPCRI) combining centrifugation, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging, and resistivity profiling. Since 2021, the wireless resistivity index (WiRI) method allows the acquisition of capillary pressure and resistivity index in a matter of days. This method is based on a new in-house system to acquire wirelessly resistivity indexes along a rock sample during centrifugation. The determination of the resistivity vs. saturation curve and the n exponent of Archie’s law is done thanks to an optimization algorithm. In this paper, we present the results obtained from multiple simulations and experiments for WiRI, UFPCRI, and porous plate to discuss the advantages and drawbacks of each method in terms of reliability and experimental duration. Six rock samples are studied. A comparison of the three methods regarding Archie’s n exponent, resistivity indexes, and capillary pressure curves is performed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv64n3-2023a2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv64n3-2023a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术改进和创新是为了提供在成本、质量、速度或所有方面都具有卓越效率的解决方案。在特殊岩心分析(SCAL)领域,传统的电阻率指数测量(多孔板技术)是一种经济有效的测量方法,其结果质量好,但耗时长。为此,开发了几种方法来减少获得电阻率测量值所需的时间。2017年,我们提出了结合离心、核磁共振成像和电阻率分析的超快速毛细管压力和电阻率指数测量(UFPCRI)。自2021年起,无线电阻率指数(WiRI)方法可以在几天内获取毛细管压力和电阻率指数。该方法基于一种新的内部系统,可以在离心过程中沿岩石样品获取无线电阻率指数。利用优化算法确定了电阻率-饱和度曲线和阿奇定律n次指数。本文给出了WiRI、UFPCRI和多孔板的多次模拟和实验结果,讨论了每种方法在可靠性和实验时间方面的优缺点。研究了6个岩石样品。对比了三种方法的阿奇n指数、电阻率指数和毛管压力曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wireless Acquisition for Resistivity Index in Centrifuge – WiRI: A Comparative Study of Three Pc-RI Methods
Technological improvements and innovations are made to offer solutions with superior efficiency in terms of cost, quality, speed, or all of them. In the special core analysis (SCAL) field, the conventional resistivity index measurement (the porous plate technique) is a cost-effective method that provides good-quality results but is very time consuming. For this purpose, several methods were developed to reduce the time taken to acquire resistivity measurements. In 2017, we proposed the ultra-fast capillary pressure and resistivity index measurements (UFPCRI) combining centrifugation, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging, and resistivity profiling. Since 2021, the wireless resistivity index (WiRI) method allows the acquisition of capillary pressure and resistivity index in a matter of days. This method is based on a new in-house system to acquire wirelessly resistivity indexes along a rock sample during centrifugation. The determination of the resistivity vs. saturation curve and the n exponent of Archie’s law is done thanks to an optimization algorithm. In this paper, we present the results obtained from multiple simulations and experiments for WiRI, UFPCRI, and porous plate to discuss the advantages and drawbacks of each method in terms of reliability and experimental duration. Six rock samples are studied. A comparison of the three methods regarding Archie’s n exponent, resistivity indexes, and capillary pressure curves is performed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信